Thin Line Between Love And Bait
My relationship with a man I'd been dating was getting serious. His previous relationship ended when his girlfriend dumped him. Last month, he ran into her and told her he was seeing me. She began crying and begged him to take her back. He was torn about what to do. I told him his feelings for her weren't romantic but stemmed from a sense of obligation, and that he should be angry at her for trying to make him feel bad about moving on with someone else. He still went back to her, and now they're engaged. I'm furious. Why would he choose to be with someone who dumped him? He could've moved forward with someone who really cares, with whom he could have a relationship based on love, not guilt (over making this other woman cry). How can I prevent this from happening to me again?
--Outraged
We sometimes explain things to ourselves in ways that don't so much lay out the facts as provide an airbag for our feelings. Take a question I often hear from readers: "Why did he/she stop returning my calls?" Helpfully, many suggest the most likely explanation right in their email; something like, "I just know they were kidnapped by the Russian mob." Right. And they're probably still tied up in an abandoned warehouse, being tortured till they give in -- agree to withdraw and hand over the entire $36.72 in their checking account.
Though female tears can be a sort of kryptonite for straight men, I'm sorry to say it's unlikely this other woman's boohoos and a sense of obligation on your guy's part mind-controlled him into going back to her.
There's this notion that relationships simply involve two people who love each other making each other happy. Supposedly, once you've got that, it's all cartoon birdies, butterflies, and flowers till you're both sleeping out eternity in side by side cemetery plots.
In fact, the human mind evolved to have a built-in accounting department. Its jobs include preventing us from being "all give" to some "all take" sociobro, which, for ancestral humans, would've posed survival issues. In the mating sphere, our inner accountant continually calculates our mate value and that of our partner (or prospective partner), gauging whether we're selling ourselves short -- or whether our partner's likely to come to that conclusion about being involved with us.
Chances are when your guy was with this other woman the first time around, he felt out of his league -- perhaps sensing that, on a one-to-10 scale, he's, say, a 6 to her 8.9. If this was the case, he probably acted somewhat needy and clingy: qualities that are not exactly ladybait. She, in turn, probably sensed she could do better and put him out on the curb.
But then something changed that changed him: He got a woman (you) who made him feel loved and wanted, which likely shifted his demeanor from needy-clingy to comfortably confident. Assuming this was what went on, you basically provided him with the romantic version of going to the grocery store on a full stomach to avoid standing weeping in the doughnut aisle.
Additionally, though it's unlikely the guy planned this, you probably served as bait to bring his girlfriend back. Social psychologists Jessica Parker and Melissa Burkley find that single women (but not those in relationships) rate a man as "significantly" more desirable and pursuit-worthy when they're told he's taken.
"This may be because an attached man" has been "'pre-screened' by another woman," speculate Parker and Burkley. This "pre-screening" is a form of "social proof," a term coined by social psychologist Robert Cialdini. We sometimes decide what we should value based on what other people value. In this case, your finding the guy boyfriend-worthy might've led his ex to think, "Uh-oh...I made a mistake dumping him."
Of course you're hurt and disappointed. But it sounds like you also feel cheated to some degree, like something you deserve was stolen from you. There's a tendency to think love should be "fair," meaning whatever you put into a relationship, you're owed in return. In fact, people in relationships ultimately act in their self-interest. That sometimes involves dumping the partner who's done nothing but love them for the partner who dumped them but is willing to take them back.
Understanding this is no guarantee you won't get hurt. However, if you're realistic about love -- recognizing that you can't expect it to be fair -- and about the danger from potential mate poachers, you might have a shot at amping up your game and fending them off. To be on the alert for them, keep in mind the physical features that make a man especially attractive to a single woman on the prowl: broad shoulders, a chiseled jaw, and big perky boobs on the girlfriend sitting on his lap.
For pages and pages of "science-help" from me, buy my latest book, "Unf*ckology: A Field Guide to Living with Guts and Confidence." It lays out the PROCESS of transforming to live w/confidence.








I appreciate your use of the term "mate value" as opposed to "sexual marketplace value" (SMV), the later term evoking images of people being sold at some sort of auction based on their attractiveness.
SMV also has sleazy pickup artist connotations as opposed to "mate value".
Publius Quibbleworth at September 26, 2021 6:04 PM
Although there is no guarantee, you should make sure the person you are about to get involved with is over his/her ex. The longer and deeper the relationship, the longer it takes to move on. If someone is freshly single, proceed with caution.
Fraulein Gretel at September 30, 2021 11:11 AM
Right or wrong, the heart wants what the heart wants. It really is no reflection on you, your value, or your mate worthiness in any way.
matt at October 5, 2021 8:46 PM
I really wish I had thought this way when I was, say, 26. My girlfriend of three and half years unceremoniously dumped me February 28, 1987, with the most generic Dear John letter imaginable. I stumbled into her later that year — whereupon I learned she was engaged to a newly minted (and very Jewish) podiatrist. Many years later, I concluded that
1) She met him well before the breakup.
2) The sales pitch was something like "what are you doing with this loser? I can get you out of that lousy apartment tomorrow."
3) Plus, Jewish doctor. Her faith was more important than I think she let on to me, and really wanted kids raised in that religion. Plus, Jewish doctor: her mother was a drunk who felt the world had cheated her (her marriage to a ne'er-do-well collapsed), and wouldn't that just twist the knife to marry better than her evil, self-absorbed mother?
4) What else do people do on the first of the month? Oh, right, they move. (This was the part it took me a quarter century to figure out. Duh.)
All in all, the one favor I think she did me was sparing me from her mother as a mother-in-law, but man, that really hurt at the time.
Rob McMillin at October 6, 2021 9:35 AM
And to think there's a joke about a redneck being married three times and still having the same in-laws... who knew - they were being sensible!
Radwaste at October 8, 2021 5:54 AM
Let's see. She dumped him, so he probably still had unresolved feelings about that. Getting back together with her allowed him to resolve those feelings.
In reality, you cannot absolutely prevent it from happening again. Past thirty, you're unlikely to find someone without emotional baggage - or want them if you do find them.
You can, however, find someone with better handles on their baggage. Look for suitcases with plenty of scuffs on them, sturdy baggage unlikely to suddenly spring open in the middle of the journey.
Too many metaphors? Yeah, it's been that kinda day.
Conan the Grammarian at October 20, 2021 11:35 AM
Let's see. She dumped him, so he probably still had unresolved feelings about that. Getting back together with her allowed him to resolve those feelings.
In reality, you cannot absolutely prevent it from happening again. Past thirty, you're unlikely to find someone without emotional baggage - or want them if you do find them.
You can, however, find someone with better handles on their baggage. Look for suitcases with plenty of scuffs on them, sturdy baggage unlikely to suddenly spring open in the middle of the journey.
Too many metaphors? Yeah, it's been that kinda day.
Conan the Grammarian at October 20, 2021 11:36 AM
Leave a comment