It's Just Like American TV!
Perish forbid we should see a bit of Janet Jackson's titty, but A-OK to see people blowing people's heads off! Arianna notes the difference between a firing offense and a promotable offense in the American military:
Four-star General Kevin Byrnes, the third most senior of the Army’s 11 four-star generals, was sacked over allegations that he had an extramarital affair. Meanwhile, Lt. General Ricardo Sanchez, the senior commander in Iraq during the Abu Ghraib torture and abuse scandal, is being considered for promotion to, yep, four-star general.Talk about your utterly perverted priorities.
...Consider: in modern times, no four-star general has ever been relieved of duty for disciplinary reasons; prior to this incident Byrne had a spotless military record; he has been separated from his wife since May 2004; the allegations do not involve anyone under his command or connected to the DoD; and he was already set to retire in November.
Something doesn’t add up. Would the Army really can a four-star General with 36 years of service, three months shy of his retirement, because he screwed someone other than his wife... in the middle of a war? We are at war, right? No wonder speculation is mounting that there has to be more -- much more -- to this story than is being told.
Was the affair with a man? Was the man underage? Did he not only ask, but also tell? Was, say, one of the Bush twins involved? Did the illicit liaison entail incredibly kinky behavior... something involving a dog leash, women’s panties, fake blood, a Koran, and a Lynddie England mask?
Or was Gen. Byrnes busted for engaging in straight, vanilla, missionary, once-a-week-with-the-lights-off boffing with the slightly overweight neighbor lady down the street?
Is this what it takes for Rummy and company to continue seeing themselves as paragons of virtue who will do whatever is necessary to hold people accountable for their private conduct...while turning a blind eye to the wanton assault on decency and morality that has marked our handling of Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, and Bagram?
In other words, it’s the s-e-x, stupid! The GOP base will eat it up. A little unnerved that Roberts gave a freebie to the gays? Don’t sweat it. The Bush administration demonstrates it will not stand for a leader who breaks his vows (other than vows to fire anyone involved in the Plame leak, that is).







I read your political screeds with great interest, but...using people like Robert Scheer and this person may not represent the most credible sources.
Dmac at August 11, 2005 8:45 AM
Well, if you believed that the Bushman and the Big Dick wanted to restore honor and dignity to the White House, you must have believed Dollar Bill, when he said he didn't inhale. In most instances, you should do and believe the opposite of what is being stated.
Mad Hungarian at August 11, 2005 9:14 AM
Quoting Arianna is a new low, Amy. You might want to consider a short blogging hiatus for some therapy.
Richard Bennett at August 11, 2005 12:11 PM
Sexual peccadilloes seem to be the only thing that will get the public's attention. I seem to recall legions of fans clamoring to excuse a sitting President for same, even though he was abusing not only his "partners" but his wife, through infidelity.
They had so much emotional investment in their father figure they couldn't accept the idea that this was a sign of a seriously unfit person, with which they had nothing in common. You could forget about anyone seeing the abuses of power and privilege which were a staple of his administration.
The attempt to contrast the two officers in these cases is fallacious, of course. Neither is worthy of emulation; neither sets the example for their subordinates.
Radwaste at August 11, 2005 1:47 PM
I bet Arianna is more fun in bed than Ann Coulter. Then again, Ariannas husband did go to the other side....but still.
eric at August 11, 2005 2:37 PM
I will give Arianna credit for one thing: she's done more for the cause of gay marriage than most people.
Richard Bennett at August 11, 2005 3:44 PM
I admire her because she's a self - made woman.
Dmac at August 12, 2005 7:27 AM
Arianna is a child support queen, there's nothing self-made or self-supporting about her.
Richard Bennett at August 12, 2005 2:48 PM
I was being sardonic, Richard. Good lord, you've got to lighten up here!
Dmac at August 12, 2005 3:34 PM
Hmm. What is a "child-support queen"? Do you object to the laws of our nation regarding same? Then, where are all the other "child-support queens"?
The term, "self-made" means that a person used exceptional effort to gain status and/or prosperity. It does not mean that the person had no help.
It appears to me that you have extended a dislike for the personality and her stated views into fallacious judgment about her personal life. Have you?
Radwaste at August 14, 2005 10:04 AM
Yes, I object to the laws that require certain men to pay their ex-wives $20,000 a month (and more) to do with as they please.
Richard Bennett at August 16, 2005 11:48 AM
Leave a comment