Kaus Kuts Through The Krap In Obama's Speech
Here's a bit of Mickey's analysis of what he calls "Obama's Not A State-Of-The-Union Speech":
Obama pitched his ambitious health plans as a way to "address the crushing cost of health care." Hmm. Weren't we told that the genius of Hillary Clinton's health care plan was that it deferred the cost-reduction issue and focused on providing coverage first? I think we were! That certainly seems like the easiest way to go (in part because, if you believe health care costs are driven by expensive and useful new technologies, universal coverage will never happen if you have to control costs first). That Obama wants to reverse Hillary's order--costs first, coverage later--becomes clearer when you parse the relevant section:It includes an historic commitment to comprehensive health care reform - a down-payment on the principle that we must have quality, affordable health care for every American. It's a commitment that's paid for in part by efficiencies in our system that are long overdue. [E.A.]So "comprehensive health care reform" isn't universal coverage at all. It's a package of cost-cutting measures that precede (are a "down payment" on) a "principle" of universal coverage. Yikes.







Yep, and any way you look at it, it's still rationing.
Cousin Dave at February 25, 2009 10:28 AM
Renew your passports, people. Soon we'll be partaking of medical tourism to India and Costs Rica to pay cash for our procedures too.
momof3 at February 25, 2009 10:40 AM
Parsing Obama's speeches is a grammar excercise. Assigning or parsing meanings is useless.
How can you parse out meanings from a collection of metaphors, qualifications ("in part", "comprehensive"), and abstractions ("quality", "affordable", "principle") that were put together to sound good.
All meanings are deferred to a later time, when Obama and his team decides what he said, from among the possibly contradictory things that he has said.
Andrew_M_Garland at February 25, 2009 3:17 PM
Leave a comment