CNN comment:

It was written to further discredit this presumed Ussama bin Laden. These people are trying to brainwash us,I suspect.

Whadd'ya mean "discredit"?

So 'sama still got a hard on. This is bad in what universe?

Just retweeted a tweet (why cant I see my own retweets???) that I can't find now...because i can't see it....

But it said something about porn is often used to hide other messages in plain site on the internet or something.... He might have been hiding more than that with the porn, IF YA KNOW WHAT I MEAN...but it was an interesting take.

Damn, how the hell can you find a retweet without having to scroll through a ton of tweets to find the original tweet....annoying.

Well..I am no fan of Islam, as repressively practiced, and double no fan of bin Laden...but.

This smells like the original story that "bin Laden used a wife as a shield as he shot at US troops trying to capture him."

Later we find out bin Laden was not armed, and US armed forces shot an unarmed civilian woman (bin Laden's wife). And that our guys shot bin Laden dead, when bin Laden was unarmed (oh, boo-hoo, but the truth is the truth).

In short, sadly, just as Bush jr. lied constantly, so Obama is now lying. Porn in the compound? I doubt it, and I don't care.

We can't believe anything our government says about defense matters, or the bin Laden compound.

They should've increased the interest level by claiming he was caught with some sort of fetish pig porn, or something. That would've been interesting to read.

Incidentally, I worked at a Barnes and Noble for a few years, and one very common purchase for young men was a Holy Bible and a skin mag.

Everyone remember to buckle up out there!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfF1vkMQ0h0

Given the Taliban's rather unorthodox taste, it was probably nudie pics of 5-to-8 year-old boys.

or some hot looking sheep, or a 5-8 year old boy eating a ham sandwich.

Eric!! That was too funny, spanks for posting that!!

I'll take such crappy, unverifiable news with a truckload of salt