Big Government Grows Spokes And Handlebars
Santa Monica has palm trees, sunshine and bike lanes all over the place. Do we really need government to pay to encourage people to bike?
Ridiculous puff piece in the LA Times by a guy named Matt Stevens who, like so many, credulously accepts the need for government to reach into every area of our lives with its big, greasy, taxpayer-funded hand.
I mean, really -- just check out the headline:
Santa Monica Bike Center pushes pedaling for commuters: City program aims to get commuters out of their cars by letting them test-ride a bike for two weeks, for free, to see if they like the experience.
From the piece:
By the time Barry Balmat showed up at the Santa Monica Bike Center, he had already compiled a laundry list of reasons why biking to work might not work.The Santa Monica resident lived just two miles from his office, but the thought of pedaling just feet from passing cars without a shell of protection was "a little anxiety inducing," he said. Then there was the question of how exactly to make left turn. And he wasn't sure whether he'd need to shower.
But the bike center's offer of a free, well-equipped bike for two weeks was simply too good to pass up. And like so many of the program's guinea pigs, Balmat said his worries faded after only a few days on the streets.
"I got to the point where I didn't really worry at all," Balmat said. Now he's looking to buy a commuter bike of his own.
That's the idea behind the Santa Monica Bike Center's bike-commuter program. With the nation's largest bike-parking facility in one of the country's most traffic-clogged areas, Santa Monica officials hope that five loaner bicycles bought for just $3,500 can accelerate a national trend.
Of course, they had to buy $700 bikes.
And of course, there's a "good" excuse for buying them:
Bike advocates say the push began when riders formed Santa Monica Spoke in 2009, becoming the first local chapter of the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition. A year later, the city adopted a planning document that called for increased emphasis on bicycling to address traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions, among other goals.
But, again, they've built bike lanes everywhere. Must they really use the big hand of government to open the wallet filled with our dollars and put people on bikes?
Check this out:
Although only about a dozen riders have checked out bikes, the Santa Monica program has attracted a variety of clients. Some, like Balmat, commuted to work and loved getting the exercise. Others used the bikes to ride to the library and the grocery store. One experienced rider used the commuter bike for a more comfortable ride at CicLAvia.Most of the bike borrowers said they are now contemplating buying their own. Brad Edwards, general manager of Helen's Cycles, which operates a store in Santa Monica, said he's seen a surge in the sale of commuter bikes, both because of the center's program and because of a general movement toward cycling in the city over the last three years.
Here's some crappy advocacy reporting from Matt Stevens. Only about a dozen riders have checked out bikes, but Brad Edwards says he's seen a surge in the sale of commuter bikes because of the program? It sounds like he was asked a leading question and gave a tactful answer rather than a true one.
Oh, and for the record, I have a bike. I biked all over New York (often in high heels with rubber soles), but that was a different time -- a before-cell-phones time.
What happens when people who ride bikes in these bike lanes get picked off by some texting asshole and end up quadriplegic? Will the program buy them a special expensive wheelchair they can use to cruise the bike lanes?







"What happens when people who ride bikes in these bike lanes get picked off by some texting asshole and end up quadriplegic?"
Hah! Around here we have lots and lots of bicyclists, and you're just as likely to see them texting as the drivers. There haven't been any bad accidents, surprisingly enough, but lots of close calls.
Pricklypear at October 30, 2012 8:08 AM
In my city we have lots of bike lanes and lots of people riding bikes. I haven't seen anyone having trouble. All of the bicyclists I've seen have been cautious, and drivers are more cautious around them.
MonicaP at October 30, 2012 9:41 AM
Why aren't the bicycle manufacturers sponsoring this program? Why does it have to be taxpayer dollars?
Conan the Grammarian at October 30, 2012 11:36 AM
A $700 bike is actually reasonable if you're doing such a program in the first place (which they should not).
But given that they're doing the program in the first place, the $700 loaners will be a better investment than $200 Wal-Mart ones that will be far, far less durable, especially in the hands of people who don't care about maintaining them or the like.
Cheap bikes tend to break easily and more rapidly.
So, stupid program, but within its own constraints that's exactly the right way to spend the budget.
Sigivald at October 30, 2012 12:46 PM
Conan: "Why aren't the bicycle manufacturers sponsoring this program?"
Maybe they are, indirectly. It might be cheaper to buy a couple of local politicians than a bunch of bicycles.
Ken R at October 30, 2012 8:03 PM
I hate bikers, I drive for a living and most of them are bigger hazards than texters, at least if a texter plows into me his insurance will cover the damage, if a biker hits me I'm assumed at fault, plus I find it amazing how they always manage to bunch up to the point where they are riding in the driving lane 4 or 5 deep
lujlp at October 30, 2012 10:09 PM
Lujlp;
I'm a bicycle rider (for fun, not commuting) and yes, most of the cyclists on the road are hazards - they far too often demand to be given "equality" on the street; yet, often ignore stop signs and other laws.
Not to mention those that show up at work all sweaty and then smell the rest of the day.
Charles at November 1, 2012 10:42 AM
"Not to mention those that show up at work all sweaty and then smell the rest of the day."
On the other hand, I don't have to meet her mom to know she'll hold up over time.
smurfy at November 1, 2012 4:57 PM
This is just another European, Socialist propaganda piece that the left is using to get American's out of their cars and onto bicycles. The left is busily pushing their agenda in order to remake us into Europe or China so that everyone will be a good little serf and ride their bike to work and everywhere else. What happens when it rains or snows or their is ice on the ground? In addition, I don't want to get to work all nasty and sweaty, although if I had a shower and a locker to keep clothes in that would be different. This will not work in many places. So what is next? the government forcing everyone into the cities so that they can ride bikes? What about the kid who rode their bike to school 2 or 3 miles and the mom got arrested for it because the kid was on a busy road?
Are we going to see our "dear leaders" (politicians and bureaucrats) on bicycles? Hell no, that is for the "little people" "I am too important to ride a bike"
dragonslayer666 at November 3, 2012 7:59 AM
Leave a comment