New York Times Is Actually Selling Tours Of Iran
From SmarterTimes, Ira Stoll writes about a travel pitch that couldn't get stupider, for the price of $6,995:
13-day tours of Iran guided by Times journalist Elaine Sciolino. Promotional material for the tour on the Times website promises "luxurious hotels" and describes Tehran as a city where "the young and fashionable adopt a new trendy joie de vivre." Also on the itinerary: "a pleasant evening stroll around the colorful bazaars," along with insights into the "accomplishments" of the late Ayatollah Khomeini....The Times promotional language says participants will "Enjoy some time haggling over spices, textiles, antiques and copper handicrafts" at the Vakil Bazaar in Shiraz before retiring to their "five-star hotel boasting stunning Persian soft furnishings." Another day is said to feature a "relaxing evening and dinner."
There's no mention at all in the Times promotional language about the tour of Iran's status as a state supporter of terrorism, of its pursuit of nuclear weapons, or of its human rights abuses. For information about those abuses, anyone considering plunking down nearly $7,000 for the pleasure of accompanying a Times journalist on a "relaxing evening and dinner" after antique shopping in Iran may want to consider, first, browsing the State Department's latest human rights report on Iran. It reports that under Iranian law, "a woman who appears in public without an appropriate headscarf (hijab) may be sentenced to lashings and fined." It also says that "The law criminalizes consensual same-sex sexual activity, which may be punishable by death or flogging."
One can understand why the Times is seeking new revenue opportunities as a tour operator, since its revenues in traditional areas such as newspaper subscriptions and advertising are not growing fast enough to satisfy investors. But there is potential for this sort of thing to adversely affect the Times' journalism. How fair will Times journalism be toward those calling for tougher Iran sanctions if the sanctions would force the newspaper to cancel its lucrative luxury tours of Iran? Why are Times journalists lending their reputations, such as they are, to promotional material that describes Iran as a kind of paradise -- "colorful bazaars," "trendy joie de vivre" -- while skipping over the reality of other parts of Iran, like, say, Evin Prison?
If you're lucky, you might even get to see some adulterers stoned or gay people hanged!
via @instapundit








Lefty mainstream journalists are not "questioning authority". They're working for the other side.
Cousin Dave at October 13, 2014 7:49 AM
Speaking compliments to power.
Andrew_M_Garland at October 13, 2014 9:43 AM
Great, Andrew.
Amy Alkon at October 13, 2014 9:59 AM
First thought: some people have more money than sense.
Second thought: I was wondering if the tour included a viewing of the fruits of the justice system.
I R A Darth Aggie at October 13, 2014 11:57 AM
Probably a safer vacation than some parts of Mexico, though, and they're right next door.
I mean, if you need something to worry about or something.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at October 13, 2014 3:04 PM
Funny. Just last spring the New York press got ghetto tours of the Bronx shut down.
Canvasback at October 13, 2014 5:18 PM
Eh, it's like the tours of Russia back in the day. The forbidden exotic is always gonna have a certain allure for some people.
NicoleK at October 14, 2014 2:47 AM
"The forbidden exotic is always gonna have a certain allure for some people."
Yeah, and then when they get kidnapped, the U.S. taxpayer has to pony up for the ransom. And/or U.S. soldiers have to put their lives at risk for a rescue.
Cousin Dave at October 14, 2014 6:41 AM
I think this simply serves the Eat-Pray-Love-style desire to buy "enlightenment" through entertainment, cushy foreign travel, and the fantasy of sex with a mysterious swarthy guy.
bkmale at October 14, 2014 8:31 AM
"Buy enlightenment through entertainment..." I'm going to steal that.
Cousin Dave at October 15, 2014 7:18 AM
Leave a comment