Execution By Cop: Sickening Murder By Cop Of An Unarmed, Fleeing Black Man
It was a traffic stop. The guy was running away, posing no danger to the officer.
Michael S. Schmidt and Matt Apuzzo write in The New York Times that a South Carolina police officer was charged with murder in a black man's death. The video -- and what the officer did: shoot an unarmed, fleeing man in the back -- is horrible and sickening to watch.
From the story:
A white police officer in North Charleston, S.C., was charged with murder on Tuesday after a video surfaced showing him shooting and killing an apparently unarmed black man in the back while he ran away.The officer, Michael T. Slager, 33, had said he feared for his life because the man took his stun gun in a scuffle after a traffic stop on Saturday. A video, however, shows the officer firing eight times as the man -- Walter L. Scott, 50 -- fled.
...The shooting unfolded after Officer Slager stopped the driver of a Mercedes-Benz with a broken taillight, according to police reports. Mr. Scott ran away, and Officer Slager chased him into a grassy lot that abuts a muffler shop. He fired his Taser, an electronic stun gun, but it did not stop Mr. Scott, according to police reports.
Moments after the struggle, Officer Slager reported on his radio, "Shots fired and the subject is down. He took my Taser," according to police reports.
But the video, which was taken by a bystander and provided to The New York Times by Mr. Scott's lawyer, presents a different account. The video begins in the vacant lot, apparently moments after Officer Slager fired his Taser. Wires, which carry the electrical current from the stun gun, appear to be extending from Mr. Scott's body as the two men tussle and Mr. Scott turns to run.
Something -- it is not clear whether it is the stun gun -- is either tossed or knocked to the ground behind the two men and Officer Slager draws his gun, the video shows. When the officer fires, Mr. Scott appears to be 15 to 20 feet away and fleeing. He falls after the last of eight shots.
The officer then runs back toward where the initial scuffle occurred and picks something off the ground. Moments later, he drops an object near Mr. Scott's body, the video shows.
As David Burge -- @iowahawkblog -- tweeted:
@iowahawkblog This is a goddamned obscenity. Surprised he didn't shoot the cameraman too. #WalterScott
Also sickening is the description in the article of how Scott was just left there on the ground, face-down and cuffed, "for several minutes after the shooting." Police reports claim the officers performed CPR. That's not what the camera said. After those "several minutes":
A second officer arrives, puts on blue medical gloves and attends to Mr. Scott, but is not shown performing CPR. As sirens wail in the background, a third officer later arrives, apparently with a medical kit, but also not seen performing CPR.
How many others have had their lives ended in a similar way by this particular cop?








Why did this go to the New York Times?
Radwaste at April 7, 2015 5:53 PM
They actually charged him. That makes it news.
If the charges are not dismissed or plea-bargained down to nothing, it will be real news (and I will have hope for the future of our country).
jdgalt at April 7, 2015 6:16 PM
And in the comments on the NYT article, there are the usual "let's not jump to conclusions" idiots defending the 'hero' cop. Funny how people can look at the same thing and see something different.
DrCos at April 8, 2015 3:49 AM
"....Why did this go to the New York Times?..."
As I understand it, the person who shot the video offered it to the NYT first, who then made it available to the police. Shrewd move on the part of the videographer, who also needs to leave town and lay low for a while.
This was an execution.
roadgeek at April 8, 2015 4:36 AM
"This was an execution."
And without the video, he would have gotten away with.
Matt at April 8, 2015 7:50 AM
it.
Matt at April 8, 2015 7:56 AM
It is not a crime under South Carolina Law to operate a auto with a broken tail light. Only one light is required
tmitsss at April 8, 2015 8:11 AM
Considering the officer actually seems to be looking directly at the camera man at one point, the camera man is lucky he wasn't taken out right then and there.
Patrick at April 8, 2015 10:48 AM
Life without parole. It's only fair.
Steve Daniels at April 8, 2015 12:38 PM
About the "no CPR" thing: If you have two or more shots through the chest, there's no chance at all, and the condition is gross enough for a bystander to recognize that there is no chance. So I'm not making a big deal about nobody trying to revive a thoroughly dead guy - if that happened.
CPR works - sometimes - on low-voltage electrocutions, short-period drownings and minor heart attacks. It has no power to close bullet holes.
Radwaste at April 10, 2015 6:12 AM
Sort of off topic; but, not really.
There was a suggestion that the reason Scott ran was because he didn't want to go to jail, AGAIN! He had been in jail before for failure to pay child support.
Not that I'm in favor of letting folks off the hook for not supporting their children; but, he was sentenced to JAIL for not paying?!
Am I the only one who thinks that is crazy? I could see sentencing him to community service or some other program to make him pay; but sentencing to jail for not paying!?
How does one pay a fine, taxes, or whatever the government declares you owe if you're sitting in jail?
charles at April 11, 2015 6:41 AM
About the "no CPR" thing: If you have two or more shots through the chest, there's no chance at all, and the condition is gross enough for a bystander to recognize that there is no chance. So I'm not making a big deal about nobody trying to revive a thoroughly dead guy - if that happened.
Thats a perfectly valid point Radwaste, unfortunately the OFFICIAL report, with sworn statements and signed claims that multiple officers did preform CPR
lujlp at April 11, 2015 5:25 PM
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Cops shoots gun, not taser, says I'm sorry.
Phil at April 12, 2015 4:15 PM
Leave a comment