"Affirmative" Sex Life Ruining: What Was Romantic For Me 13 Years Ago Can Now Get You Expelled As A Campus Rapist
I like to joke that I got my boyfriend at the Apple computer store, and I really did. Flirted with him at the store at The Grove, and then he took me for soda at the adjacent Farmers Market (not really a farmer's anything -- more of a covered market). And then, several hours later, he had a plane to catch, so he walked me to my car -- and grabbed me and kissed me.
It was one of those awesome romantic moments you see in chick flicks.
And no, he didn't just kiss some random woman out of the blue. I'd been looking at him probably googoo-eyed for hours. He's not an idiot or a pussy, so he grabbed me and we made out in the parking lot. I loved it.
Well, things change, and what's changing fast is that all the fun and spontaneity are being governmentally sucked out of sex and romance on campus. (Prediction: Next stop, off-campus, as in, state attempts to apply this to the rest of us.)
The latest is from a story in the Star Tribune by Maura Lerner about all the "affirmative consent" policies the government is forcing colleges to adopt through the threat of a denial of funding:
The University of Minnesota is joining a national movement requiring students to obtain "affirmative consent" from their sex partners or risk being disciplined for sexual assault.The policy change, sometimes known as the "yes means yes" rule, has been sweeping college campuses across the country since California passed the first such law last year.
The U's new rule, which is poised to take effect this month after a 30-day comment period, says that sex is OK only if both parties express consent through "clear and unambiguous words or actions." Absent that, it would fit the U's definition of sexual assault.
So far, the plan has prompted little dissent at the U. But nationally, critics have derided such policies as absurd and dangerous, particularly when it comes to protecting the rights of the accused.
"Once that accusation has been made, it's somehow up to the accused person to prove they did have consent," said Robert Shibley, executive director of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), a civil liberties group in Philadelphia. "What that means is that they're guilty until proven innocent."
What's happening is that it isn't just a "person" who's forced to prove this but a man. Men are the ones being accused of rape -- even in the case of a guy who was passed out at Amherst, and then, amazingly, was accused of sexual assault by the woman who blew him while he was out cold. And then he got expelled for it.
The bottom line: If you're a man accused of sexual assault on campus, due process and you are not going to meet.
Alison Berke Morano, a Florida political strategist who helped launch the "Affirmative Consent Project" (get your ugly t-shirt now!) is thrilled to bits at the spread of these sick "affirmative consent" rules.
No, never mind how you want your sex life to work, whether you think it's sexy to have some guy you've been making eyes at for hours grab you and kiss you. If you're a man and you so much as grab and hold the hand of the person you're on a date with without written consent, you could be facing sexual assault charges and get expelled from school. (And yes, this is supposedly intended to apply to women, too. Supposedly.)
Here's a bit from Alison's packet to ruin your sex life (at least in the way I want to have sex, which is spontaneously and not by being asked to fill out a permission slip). 
via ifeminists








What a load of crap. I wouldn't let my blow-up doll sign one of these Even if he could. Sorry, no pictures available.
This looks like a private contract for sex. All questions about specific performance aside, could they add space for a dollar amount?
Canvasback at July 7, 2015 1:14 AM
Request a jury trial.
Only allow "frumpy" house wives w/kids under 5.
Throughout the trial show scenes from "Sleepless in Seattle" asking if Meg Ryan was:
1. stalking or "checking him out" in a safe manner,
2. was Tom Hanks a "sensitive" father,
3. point out that at no time (I think) was there a "question" about "can I kiss you" from either,
4. was the building kiss truly "assault".
Definitely allow press coverage of the trial.
Bob in Texas at July 7, 2015 5:28 AM
The idea is to have no trial, but an administrative hearing by people who must use the OCR's stipulations, including a presumption of guilt, or be fired. I work for a college, and I would refuse to sit on one of these hearings, since I cannot put aside any accused persons' natural rights, even if the DOE wants me to.
spqr2008 at July 7, 2015 5:52 AM
I was late coming to this story, but director Joss Whedon (perhaps most popularly known as the director of "The Avengers" movies) recently was attacked on Twitter for his supposed sexism for his portrayal of women. Rumor has it that the attacks are what caused him to abandon his Twitter account. Whedon claims it was for other reasons.
Doubtless, feminists would attack your boyfriend as a rapist for doing what you described.
I can't help but feel that not only were these attacks unfair to Whedon, but to Scarlett Johansson. It suggests that she's so weak that she can't look out for her own interests. She either doesn't know when she's not being treated appropriately or she's such a slave to the industry that she's afraid to speak for herself, so she needs militant feminists to descend on the evil Joss Whedon for degrading her.
By suggesting that your boyfriend perpetrated some kind of sexual assault on you, they would be doing the same thing to you. Suggest that you're some femme fragile who's much too submissive to protect yourself from men who would take advantage of you, so you need the "strong" militant feminists to speak out for you.
Ultimately, these soi-disant feminists, who bear no resemblance whatsoever to the original feminists, are hurling a gross insult at any woman who is not in their ranks.
Regarding Joss Whedon's direction of Scarlett Johansson's Black Widow, as a recovering comic book junkie, I can tell you that her outfit was actually more conservative than what the Black Widow normally wears in the comics. Her outfit fits like a body stocking, or Spandex.
I do recall one scene where I took issue with the Black Widow's portrayal in the original Avengers movie. It's where Bruce Banner first hulks out on the Shield helicarrier. Black Widow flees from him (which is smart, considering he's the Hulk and she has no superpowers at all, or any weapons that could hope to even slow the Hulk down). The problem I had is that she looks like she's basically running for her life.
The Black Widow of the comic books would not have done that. She lacks the Hulk's raw power, true, but she's eminently resourceful. Even as she ran from him, she'd be plotting a way to lure him into jumping off the helicarrier, thus protecting everyone on board. Still, I can't complain about that too much. I don't have any superpowers either, and if the Hulk were chasing me, I'd be running for my life, too, without regard for any convenient means of disposing of him; I'd just run like hell.
Patrick at July 7, 2015 5:52 AM
Let's go back over the rules for men at university:
1. Keep your mouth shut.
2. Parrot back whatever the instructor says. Don't waste your time trying to make sense of it.
3. Take notes. Not just in class, but everywhere when you're on campus. Make notes of where you go, when you got there, when you left, what you did, and who saw you there.
4. Do not be alone with a woman anywhere on campus. Do not be alone with a university woman anywhere at all. Do not touch them at all, and do not allow them to touch you. Do not have them as friends. Do not offer them rides or get in a car with them. Do not converse with them on any topic not having to do with classwork. And even if the topic is classwork-related, if it can in any way be construed as relating to sex, just agree with her and say nothing further. See rule #1.
5. Have your fun off campus, with townie girls.
6. Live off campus if possible. Do not spend any more time on campus than you have to.
7. Do not attend parties or student events on campus. Do not attend any event anywhere organized by a fraternity or sorority.
8. You are there to get an education. That's all. Get your education and get the hell out of there.
Cousin Dave at July 7, 2015 6:27 AM
"What's an 'Avenger'?" - Browncoat
Protests about how Scarlett Johansson is handled illustrates nicely how some activists have tunnel vision.
Joss' Firefly prominently featured women of every capability, from soldier to registered prostitute. I suspect the reason the show was canceled was that Inara had a female client.
Radwaste at July 7, 2015 6:38 AM
"I work for a college, and I would refuse to sit on one of these hearings, since I cannot put aside any accused persons' natural rights, even if the DOE wants me to."
If you think the accused has rights, the college doesn't want you on the panel.
dee nile at July 7, 2015 7:03 AM
Alternately: do as much college online in MMOCs as possible. Avoid human interaction with other students as much as possible. Combine with 1,2,3, and 8 above. . .
Keith Glass at July 7, 2015 7:09 AM
Why do only college women merit these protections? Why don't non-college women deserve to be protected?
Or is this really about something other than protecting women?
Conan the Grammarian at July 7, 2015 7:45 AM
Joss Whedon, didn't he create Buffy the Vampire Slayer? The story idea being one where the young blond gal saves the world from Big Bad Vampires?
Yeah, clearly he thinks women are totally incapable simpering idiots.
Of course, now that many have basically proven to him that they ARE simpering idiots, maybe he's not so much a guy who supports strong women, as one who will be stuck creating imaginary ones for lack of belief that us non-simpering gals still exist.
Shannon at July 7, 2015 8:15 AM
The trouble with the contract is it's worse than nothing. It misleads males into feeling safe, when all some nutter has to do is say "give us money or I'll say I was drunk". She doesn't need to prove she was drinking. There's no blood test - no evidence is required - it's Listen and Believe.
Any other situation they'll do a blood test. Why not this one? Isn't that interesting?
And people will do the most frightful things for the pettiest of reasons - like the group of women who tried to get a man beaten up by a mob, and then arrested as a rapist, over a $13 cab fare. He had a recording of the blackmail threat they made - it didn't help at first, but eventually he was freed. Had he not been arrested, however, the mob might have badly hurt or even killed him.
Over $13. Can't link, but search by taxi fare false rape accusation. Should be near the top.
Brett Caton at July 7, 2015 8:19 AM
What's funny is that these "contracts" have been known to work against victims. Joe Francis (of Girls Gone Wild fame) did this to a number of girls who claimed he raped them. Just put a piece of paper in front of her vaguely saying it's a "release."
Osama bin Pimpin at July 7, 2015 8:46 AM
@Brett Caton, that brought up three different incidents. Sheesh...
Allison at July 7, 2015 11:44 AM
"We shall abolish the orgasm."
George Orwell, "1984"
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at July 7, 2015 12:17 PM
You can get this through Amy's Mall:
http://www.amazon.com/Fleshlight-Original-Male-Masturbator-Pink/dp/B0026P3P7M
Maybe not as much fun, but safer than college girls.
Steve Daniels at July 7, 2015 2:54 PM
Way back when I was in college, the college had this great idea that they were actually going to make contracts available - this is about the same time as Antioch (I think) had there thing going - where students just needed to fill in and sign. Until the school's head attorney heard about it. The big problem was that once signed the contracts legally meant very little. A person had the legal right to withdraw consent at any point and that could not be contracted away. There were some other legal problems and some how potentially opened up the school to liability.
The one situation where it might have been helpful was if signed while sober, then got drunk and continued to consent - and especially didn't remove consent - then it might remain in affect.
The Former Banker at July 7, 2015 7:29 PM
Do the people who make this Affirmative Consent stuff up actually practice it themselves? Or do they just never have sex?
Ken R at July 7, 2015 10:57 PM
"Do the people who make this Affirmative Consent stuff up actually practice it themselves?"
They don't have to, because they don't have sex with icky males.
dee nile at July 8, 2015 1:43 PM
This has got to be a parody. It just has to be. Nobody really thinks or acts like that. Do they??!!??
Jay at July 8, 2015 3:52 PM
Leave a comment