Starbucks' Howard Schultz: Make Me King, And I'll Wash Your Feet. But Not Yet.
Ron Rosenbaum -- an wonderful writer and an incisive thinker worth reading -- gets it right in a tweet:
@RonRosenbaum1
Starbucks' Howard Schultz serves up VENTI BULLSH*T about why he's so humble he should be President.
Schultz writes in The New York Times:
FROM the earliest days of Starbucks, I've been captivated by the art of leadership. I was mentored over three decades by Warren G. Bennis, the eminent professor and scholar on leadership. I've gathered insights from peers, and I've drawn inspiration from our 300,000 employees. But nothing I've read or heard in the past few years has rivaled the power of the image I viewed on my cellphone a few years ago: Pope Francis, shortly after his election, kneeling and washing the feet of a dozen prisoners in Rome, one of them a young Muslim woman, in a pre-Easter ritual.In recent weeks, I have taken to recalling that humble, inspiring act of servant leadership as I observe the antithesis: a field of presidential aspirants unable to rise above petty politics.
Ron adds:
@RonRosenbaum1
He blames all on "petty politics" as if there were no real differences on vital issues.When you're CEO nobody tells you you're a fool.
More humbledrag from Schultz:
Despite the encouragement of others, I have no intention of entering the presidential fray. I'm not done serving at Starbucks. Although we have built an iconic brand while providing even part-time employees with access to health care, free college education and stock options, there is more we can do as a public company to demonstrate responsible leadership.The values of servant leadership -- putting others first and leading from the heart -- need to emerge from every corner of American life, including the business community.
...Our country is in desperate need of servant leaders, of men and women willing to kneel and embrace those who are not like them. Everyone seeking the presidency professes great love for our nation. But I ask myself, how can you be a genuine public servant if you belittle your fellow citizens and freeze out people who hold differing views?
People who "kneel" don't run for office.
People who truly care about making a difference often tend not to be all that interested in being fitted for the crown.
There's a woman here in my neighborhood who has done more to see that connected assholes don't get to violate laws and codes and abuse residents than I had thought humanly possible. I keep telling her if she runs for City Council, I'd support the hell out of her campaign. (In fact, for a while, I kept begging her to run for City Council.) She's really not interested. She doesn't want that job or to be in politics; she just wants things to not be unfair, and she works toward that as a citizen -- as I do...just nowhere near as much as she does.
Oh, and what I think Schultz is really saying? "Four years from now, vote for me for Prez!"








> I have no intention of entering the presidential fray
Hey, me too! Maybe I should also write an article about it.
Snoopy at August 6, 2015 7:18 AM
Yeah, the Communist Pope. There's a great leader for ya.
Cousin Dave at August 6, 2015 7:27 AM
I'm the most humble guy I know. Let me tell you how amazingly humble I am. Get comfy, this might take a while...
bkmale at August 6, 2015 7:58 AM
Whenever I hear the nauseating term "servant leadership" — which is en vogue with both fundamentalist dinks like Rick Santorum and capitalist-progressive dinks like Howard Schultz — I long for the days of open, naked careerism.
Kevin at August 6, 2015 9:06 AM
Caffeine is a crutch and everybody knows it.
Maybe if we made growing and selling coffee beans illegal, world peace, prosperity and health will most likely flourish. Worth a try, if only to see this Starbucks idgit thrown in jail.
Coffee tastes dumb, anyway, that's for sure.
Jason S. at August 6, 2015 9:11 AM
"Unlike the cruel Leonidas, who demanded that you stand, I require only that you kneel. "
Keith Glass at August 6, 2015 9:17 AM
Translation: I don't want to take the pay cut.
He's got a bigger forum for his ego as CEO of Starbucks than he would as president having to deal with that pesky Congress.
Although if he keeps giving away the profits to indulge his ego and provide "free college education" for his lowest-paid employees, he might find himself at odds with his shareholders.
========================================
Not "for sure" at all. Coffee tastes great, even that swill made by Schultz's company.
========================================
As a Catholic priest, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, took a lifelong vow of poverty. His "servant leadership" stems from that. Unless Schultz views Starbucks as a calling, he's not in the same job as Francis. Schultz's job is to run a corporation owned by shareholders and maximize shareholder value. Francis' job is to guide and inspire the faithful.
Conan the Grammarian at August 6, 2015 9:43 AM
Francis' job is to guide and inspire the faithful
Wrong. His job is to keep consumers paying money to the church
lujlp at August 6, 2015 10:41 AM
And he does that by presenting a pious and humble front to the public, by appearing as a religious figure, not a CEO.
To do his job, Howard Schultz needs to appear as a CEO, not a religious figure.
Conan the Grammarian at August 6, 2015 10:59 AM
When Howard Schultz signed on to sell coffeemakers with Hammarplast, he didn't take a vow of poverty, chastity, and obedience. He didn't "answer a call" when he took that job.
When Jorge Mario Bergoglio joined the priesthood, he took up a calling and vowed poverty, obedience, and chastity in his service to God.
So, yes, Francis' job is to guide and inspire the faithful - alongside his job of running the complex multinational organization that is the modern Catholic Church.
Conan the Grammarian at August 6, 2015 11:04 AM
obedience
I failed to see it in the bible, but where did god command the pope to shield the molesters of children form secular law enforcement?
In fact according to the bible, anyone who wishes to be a priest, but is not a member of the tribe of Levi is to be executed forthwith.
So he isnt very obedient
lujlp at August 6, 2015 12:21 PM
That wasn't Francis. That was the endemic failure of a bureaucracy that came to believe its own survival more important than the people it served and the failure of the Popes in charge.
Pope Benedict XVI apologized profusely on more than one occasion for the actions of the Church.
And no one is shielding the Church from the more than 3,000 secular lawsuits filed against it.
Francis has set about reforming the bureaucracy that led to those failures.
Bernard Law, the Cardinal and Archbishop of Boston was forced to resign in disgrace, leaving over $120 million in claims against the diocese. That he was not defrocked was a failure of John Paul II (I think, by canon law, he could not be). Law's ludicrous pre-resignation protest that only he could protect the children going forward was met the the derision it deserved.
"Some of the accused priests were forced to resign. Some priests whose crimes fell within statutes of limitation are in jail. Some have been defrocked. Others — because they are elderly, because of the nature of their offenses, or because they have had some success fighting the charges — cannot be defrocked under canon law. Some priests live in retreat houses that are carefully monitored and sometimes locked." [Wikipedia.org]
Thanks to the scandal, the Catholic Church lost its moral stranglehold over the hearts and minds of the Irish, leading Ireland to eventually legalize gay marriage, against the Church's wishes. And the Church's influence in Italian politics has been severely weakened.
Exodus also says the the Israelites were a "kingdom of priests," so there's some wiggle room.
And, in later books, there were non-Levite priests with duties in the Temple.
And, since the Ark of the Covenant is missing, there's not much need for Levite priests anymore.
Perhaps Catholic priests are considered Levites.
The modern word priest "comes from the Greek πρεσβύτερος presbýteros through Latin presbyter, "elder", or from Old High German priast, prest, from Vulgar Latin "prevost" "one put over others", from Latin praepositus "person placed in charge")...." [Wikipedia.org]
I'm sure it wasn't the intent of Moses to have every non-Levite elder among the Israelites executed.
Conan the Grammarian at August 6, 2015 1:50 PM
"the Communist Pope"
Don't forget the Jooz who run a secret banking cabal of Illuminati in partnership with Trotskyite Negroes and them slanty-eyed yella bastids what makes them little cars nobody buys!
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at August 6, 2015 3:30 PM
In the book of Judges, there is a parable told by Jotham known as the parable of the trees. The trees, it seems, have decided to elect a ruler over the trees. They ask the olive tree, the fig tree and the grapevine to be their king, but each one declines, being useful producers of fruit and not able to leave their offices to rule over the trees.
So, the trees finally elect the bramble, which is, of course, good for nothing.
The moral I get from this story is that those who seek political office are the last ones on earth that should have it.
Patrick at August 6, 2015 7:27 PM
Gog, reacting reflexively without looking into issues is what the people you criticize all the time do. I thought you were smarter than that.
Cousin Dave at August 7, 2015 5:33 AM
Many pundits have expressed similar thoughts.
"Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job." ~ Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Conan the Grammarian at August 7, 2015 7:59 AM
"People concerned about making a difference often tend not to be all that interested in being fitted for the crown."
"Making a difference ". .......I really hate that term.
What the hell does it actually mean, and how do you measure it?
Isab at August 7, 2015 8:03 AM
To put it a different way Isab, those interested in being effective have little desire to sit around talking all day, A.K.A. politics. Similarly your best factory workers typically have no interest in management.
Personally I can't stand middle management. Either put me at the top or the bottom. I just don't fit in the middle.
Ben at August 7, 2015 11:31 AM
Personally I can't stand middle management. Either put me at the top or the bottom. I just don't fit in the middle.
Posted by: Ben at August 7, 2015 11:31 AM
Middle management is usually filled with patronage employees, like the bosses nephew. People with too much pride fo be a worker bee, but too little competence to actually be put in charge of anything.
There are more than a few CEO's who have been promoted above their competence level and made a utter hash of things. You can read about it in numerous books written about the 2008 crash.
Isab at August 7, 2015 5:50 PM
Leave a comment