My Microaggressions: I've Apparently Ruined A Number Of People Emotionally Today, In Just Eight Hours
It's only been about eight hours that I've spent here, in Vancouver, at the annual Human Behavior and Evolution Society conference, but according to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's new list of "microaggressions," I'm a deeply offensive person.
Via ifeminists.com, here's a WND piece about the new UNC microaggressions list:
They ... define microaggressions as "brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial, gender, sexual orientation and religious slights and insults to the target person or group."These "indignities" include complimenting a speaker on her footwear, using the terms "husband/boyfriend" or "wife/girlfriend" instead of "partner/spouse," asking where someone is from, referencing Christmas vacation or suggesting a round of golf.
I hit almost all of these, I'm proud to say: Complimented Catherine on her shoes and meant to say something about Louise Barrett's, but got interrupted.
Said "boyfriend," etc., numerous times, asked about 12 people where they were from (though, admittedly, not because they looked exotic).
Referenced Christmas at one point, though I can't remember why.
I did not, however, suggest a round of golf -- though I did mention how people going out of turn at a four-way stop causes people to want to get out of their cars and put a golf club through their windows.
I explain why this is in "Good Manners for Nice People Who Sometimes Say F*ck":
Although the cost from that is minuscule, someone who imposes it on us is stealing from us (as well as turning us into a chump for obeying the rules), and psychologically, even tiny fairness violations are a big deal.Anthropologist Robert Trivers explains in his famous 1971 paper on reciprocal altruism that our sense of outrage at cheaters and rule-breakers probably developed when our ancestors started living cooperatively in small, stable hunter-gatherer bands. In an environment where group members survive by trading food and favors, there's a need to guard against the shifty-ass cheaters whose idea of reciprocity is give-and-take: You give; they take. To keep the two-legged rats at bay, our psychology evolved to include a cheater detection and punishment department, logging who owes what to whom and dispatching that information to the enforcement division, our emotions.
I now have a goal: To get lists of colleges' definitions of what microaggressions are and use them all in a single afternoon.








Totally unreal to expect that UNC/CH suggest that a student might actually work to get the things they want, using the tools the school gives them.
Microaggressed by a hot redhead with smarts? Sounds like a First World Problem. Such people had better get used to women telling them things they don't want to hear.
That's gonna happen a LOT.
Radwaste at June 29, 2016 10:59 PM
You beast. How will those poor people ever recover from such an assault?
I R A Darth Aggie at June 30, 2016 4:31 AM
I always thought he was a cad.
A powerful wealthy politician mentioning "golf" to the judge that will decide whether or not to indict his wife. The nerve.
"... he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix," said Lynch Tuesday afternoon while speaking at the Phoenix Police Department."
http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-meet-privately-in-phoenix
Bob in Texas at June 30, 2016 5:27 AM
Competitive aggrievance. It's like a new parlour game. Almost anyone can play.
Canvasback at June 30, 2016 5:33 AM
I told my wife that I liked her new shoes and that she should wear them to the golfing awards dinner and the next Christmas party.
Hope that hits the right triggers.
Jay at June 30, 2016 5:56 AM
For what it's worth, the school is now saying that the list is not official policy, and was merely something from a faculty discussion. But we know how these things often go: they label opponents "paranoid" for thinking that it will become policy, and then once the opponents have taken their media beat-down, suddenly it does become policy.
Cousin Dave at June 30, 2016 6:18 AM
How about headgear? Can I compliment a speaker on her headgear? And what if the person is not a speaker? Can I compliment her footwear then? What if the speaker is a cis-gendered male? Can I compliment his footwear?
Political Correctness has gone beyond parody.
At what point does acknowledging that people may have gender identity issues devolve into enabling real mental health issues?
If you're not comfortable in the body in which you were born and you're not willing to have surgery to change your body into one in which you'll be more comfortable, do the rest of us really need to be involved?
Conan the Grammarian at June 30, 2016 6:35 AM
Amy, I bet if you really try, you can hit them all in an hour. You shouldn't need a whole afternoon.
mer at June 30, 2016 6:53 AM
Sadly I had to take a class on this or rather a slightly more generic version where any showing of preference or inequality counts. My whole department did. Even statements like "Banker, I would like to hear your opinion on this."
The Former Banker at June 30, 2016 8:22 AM
And one other thing. At work they have made some bathrooms to be "All gender" bathrooms to be more inclusive. Now some individuals are complaining that doing that sends the message that they are not actually women and this is insulting them. Further more they are refusing to use these bathrooms and instead going to bathrooms that are marked for women.
The Former Banker at June 30, 2016 8:28 AM
In the immortal words of John McEnroe, you cannot be serious.
another amy at June 30, 2016 8:31 AM
Heh, the other day I was car shopping and it bugged me that I couldn't place the salesman's accent, so I asked. So un-PC of me, but I had to know. Turns out he was French, and from The Republic of Congo. I never would have placed him myself. He didn't seem to mind, and my curiosity was sated. Take that, SJW's!
Kat at June 30, 2016 8:39 AM
argh, reminds of the new L.A. 4-way stop I've been experiencing: arrive at stop sign w/car on my right. Wait for them to go. They don't go. They are busy texting. New cars arrive at other two stop signs, waiting for us to move.
Right-of-way gets completely fucked as we all try to make our way across as the idiot woman texting (and it is always a woman) remains oblivious.
rosalind at June 30, 2016 8:40 AM
I think this artistic statement falls into the category of macroaggression, just from the sheer size of it.
I have got to stop visiting HuffPo.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at June 30, 2016 10:20 AM
“Having an office dress code that applies to men and women differently” is incorrect because it “assumes that your staff fits into one of two gender categories; can also be a violation of anti-discrimination policies.”
But, one would be forbidden to ask each person their gender identity. Catch-22. Frankly most workplaces are really really really not wanting to know about your weird sex life. It is called "work" for a reason.
Asking where someone is from can be a great conversation opener if you travel much. These people are making all conversation off limits, even what was before "safe" topics.
Craig Loehle at June 30, 2016 11:14 AM
I had a Nigerian-American cab driver in San Francisco ask me if I could guess where he was from based solely upon his accent. It sounded vaguely South African, but with a twist, so I couldn't. He than added that his countrymen were huge basketball fans and I got it on the first try. He was friendly, polite, and, on the whole, it was an enjoyable cab ride.
Conan the Grammarian at June 30, 2016 11:43 AM
These "indignities" include complimenting a speaker on her footwear, using the terms "husband/boyfriend" or "wife/girlfriend" instead of "partner/spouse," asking where someone is from, referencing Christmas vacation or suggesting a round of golf.
If someone has an interesting or particularly well-done tattoo on display, I've never hesitated to ask for a better look and inquire as to the story behind it. And people have been 100% happy to comply and answer questions, from strangers in bars to salespeople to bikers. (Obviously I wouldn't do it to someone with a Holocaust tattoo, or a medical tattoo.)
I wonder if inquiring about tattoos is microaggressing?
Kevin at June 30, 2016 12:26 PM
Good job, sugartits.
Little Shiva at June 30, 2016 2:04 PM
I have got to stop visiting HuffPo.
AAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGG! MY EYES, MY EYES. I need brain bleach, stat!
Gog that is a macroaggression!
I R A Darth Aggie at June 30, 2016 2:29 PM
"brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial, gender, sexual orientation and religious slights and insults to the target person or group."
how in the world does complimenting shoes fit into this? I don't find enough people on a daily basis who wear shoes I would compliment, so does my occasional compliment still rank as a microaggression? How is this an indignity? Hostility? Did you lunge for her shoes? I've heard people say that the "pendulum" has to swing all the way to the left for awhile to compensate for all the time it's been on the right & eventually it will land in the far more reasonable middle. Wake me up when it gets there.
Samm at June 30, 2016 4:40 PM
"...using the terms "husband/boyfriend" or "wife/girlfriend" instead of "partner/spouse,"..."
Soon enough such words will be criminalized, along with man and woman.
Emelio Lizardo at June 30, 2016 9:53 PM
There should be a whole website dedicated to reporting the daffy ideas that come from UNC Chapel Hill. I live near both them and Duke. Believe it or not, a lot of the people here who are not associated with those institutions are really nice.
Alan at July 3, 2016 9:45 PM
Leave a comment