As The World Grows Increasingly Global, The US Makes It Increasingly Horrible For Americans To Live, Earn, And Bank Overseas
Some expats are bringing a case against FATCA:
FATCA or the Foreign Account Tax Compliant Act, gives the IRS access to every foreign bank account held by every American. But it has a particularly damaging effect on Americans living overseas. That's because foreign banks are finding the reporting requirements of FATCA to be so stringent and expensive that most foreign banks are charging Americans exorbitant additional fees or are refusing to take American accounts at all.
They add:
FATCA Legal Action is fighting to protect the constitutional rights of 7.6 million overseas Americans, 12.6 million Green card holders and American businesses abroad. We need your help to stop the IRS's NSA-style invasion into your financial privacy.
Here's how FATCA affects Americans living out of the United States -- a statement by Ruth Freeborn, one the 43 percent of citizenship renouncers reporting pre-tax household income of less than $100,000. It's from a Reason piece by Matt Welch. Freeborn writes:
I was a stay at home mom to a kid with medical problems here in Canada. I married a Canadian and only moved here because his parents were elderly and depended upon him for care. I remained an American here in Canada and did not take Canadian citizenship until such time as it became impossible for me to remain American.There was no way after the implementation of FATCA that I could keep my citizenship. I tried, I wrote congress persons and did all I could for two years to see if some amendment would come so that I would not have to relinquish my citizenship. The burdens on my family here in Canada were such that I simply could not keep it. It was a gut wrenching experience that I do not think I will ever be over. I did not owe the U.S. any taxes as we are too low income for that. The problems with FATCA are a lot more complicated and harmful than just taxes owed.
At any rate it has been rare that Americans living in the U.S. have attempted to understand what is going on here. I can tell you that having to explain to my family in the U.S. that I could no longer remain American was simply horrible to have to go through, especially having to tell my father who is in his seventies.
If congress ever fixes this mess I will fight as hard as I can to get my citizenship back. It's all I can do but, those of you in the U.S. can do so much by simply calling out the baloney a lot of the press in the U.S. is propagating about FATCA. Most of the harm is not happening to "fatcats" I have met with forty U.S. citizens here in my small city and every single one said they would likely not be able to keep their citizenship and that includes veterans. Meetings have been going on here in Canada going on three years now and no one is listening to us in the U.S. or trying to do a thing about what we are going through.
I did not break any laws, I did not owe the U.S. any tax and I never would have given I have NO income and all the income in this household is earned by my Canadian spouse.








This is such a horrible law. It places such a huge burden on us. Banks have no desire to do business with Americans.
Suzanne Lucas at October 17, 2016 11:00 PM
Hahahahahaha
We just got an annoying FaCtA letter from our bank. The paperwork burden placed on banks is so onerous that we recieve piles of documents to sign every couple months
Nicolek at October 17, 2016 11:18 PM
Im kind of curious, in this day and age of internet banking. (Mine is in San Antonio Texas, 1200 miles from where I live) why any American needs an overseas bank account.
The reporting requirements are ridiculous, and it is always the middle class that is hardest hit by this shit, but if it is impossiblely difficult, why not just do your banking in the US?
I probably could understand a foregn bank account if that bank gave you a loan to buy property in the country you live in, but having lived for seven years now, in two different foreign countries, i myself have never had or needed a foreign bank account.
(Nor would I want one since being a resident of Japan, and owning property here would subject all my income, even that received in the US to Japanese taxes which are not all that low)
That hundred thousand dollar exclusion Americans working overseas under certain conditions get to claim against their US tax liability is worth a little bit of hassle to prove you are not hiding significant amounts of income in a foreign bank to evade those same taxes.
And it if it easier and less costly to give up your citizenship (and social security and medicare) to avoid those foreign bank account hassles, I guess the goverment considers that a win win.
Isab at October 18, 2016 12:24 AM
Nicole are you being serious? You don't understand the concept of an American living outside the US permanently? You do realise that some people were born and/or raised in the US and then live the remainder of their lives in another country? I am frankly aghast at your comment.
Jenny at October 18, 2016 1:18 AM
Sorry, not Nicole, but the comment underneath.
Jenny at October 18, 2016 1:19 AM
Nicole are you being serious? You don't understand the concept of an American living outside the US permanently? You do realise that some people were born and/or raised in the US and then live the remainder of their lives in another country? I am frankly aghast at your comment.
Jenny at October 18, 2016 1:18 AM
I understand you perfectly. I am serious. If you live outside the US permemantly , than you should either A. become a citizen of the country you are living in, and bank there, or B. keep your accounts in the US, if you remain a citizen of the US.
I have found it extremely easy to either use a credit card to make payments for utilities, and rent, or do a regualr direct depost from a US. Account.
If I can't do either of those, I can withdraw cash with a debit card in local currency and pay the bills that way.
Banking is international now.
I haven't seen the inside of a actual bank in ten years.
Do you find this difficult to understand?
There are a lot of really sketchy places in the world where I wouldnt want to give up the security of being able to flee to the nearest American embassy if the shit hits the fan.
I have friends who have had to do just that. So I don't take my American citizenship lightly. Half the world or more would probably kill for an American passport. That's how valuable it is.
Isab at October 18, 2016 1:39 AM
I lived 7 years in Germany until 2011. My normal US bank would not have sufficed. Fortunately, I could also use the US bank set up on the military post to pay my rent and utilities which did not accept credit card information for payment. The US bank on post had some sort of set up for it to work in the German system. Doubt keeping only US accounts would work for all expats everywhere.
N at October 18, 2016 1:56 AM
Have you ever heard of dual citizenship? I DO have citizenship of the country I live in, but am still subject to US taxation and bank account reporting, and am discriminated against when banking and investing. I want to bank where I live without being treated as a second class citizen. The only option is renunciation which has become extortionately expensive.
To be honest you sound a little ill informed or perhaps myopic as you think of all expats as 'working temporarily' overseas. I recommend doing some reading on this topic to try to understand what is happening.
Jenny at October 18, 2016 2:39 AM
Have you ever heard of dual citizenship? I DO have citizenship of the country I live in, but am still subject to US taxation and bank account reporting, and am discriminated against when banking and investing. I want to bank where I live without being treated as a second class citizen. The only option is renunciation which has become extortionately expensive.
Yes, I have, but I am more familiar with banking and taxation.
You havent made any real arguments here. Get an accountant and an immigration attorney to do the math for you, and figure out if renunciation a one time cost is worth the loss of the incredible value of US citizenship.
Methinks a lot of whiners here want to have their cake and eat it too, which is the real problem. Actually what they want is to make money off the exchange rate, moving money into dollars and then back into local currency when it is advantageous to do so. A foreign bank account makes that a lot easier.
Please give me an example of a bill you have that has to be paid by an incountry bank that cannot be paid, by a credit card, a bank transfer from a US bank, with cash or with a locally purchased money order.
There are no bills that I have in Japan that cant be paid that way. There are no bills that I had in Germany which could not be paid that way.
It is not the US governments job to make sure your life overseas is a bed of roses with the best of both worlds.
And while I think a lot of the banking laws are stupid, like the drug laws, that doesn't mean that I feel particurly sorry for those who voluntarily put themselves in a position where they become a problem when those problems can be so easily avoided.
Isab at October 18, 2016 4:10 AM
Having created the problem, the government is hardly going to resolve it.
MarkD at October 18, 2016 4:55 AM
Having created the problem, the government is hardly going to resolve it.
MarkD at October 18, 2016 4:55 AM
Isab writes: Im kind of curious, in this day and age of internet banking. (Mine is in San Antonio Texas, 1200 miles from where I live) why any American needs an overseas bank account.
I don't know how you managed to live and work in a foreign country with only a US bank account. I can only imagine you were there as a pure expat, i.e., that you were not really integrated into the local country. Just some examples:
- If you want a mortgage, for example, there is exactly zero chance that your US bank will help you buy property in your local country. You need a local bank.
- If you're working for a company in that country (as opposed to a US company), they will probably not pay your salary to an account in a foreign country.
- If you have a retirement account tied to your employment (again, assuming a local company), this will definitely involve local accounts.
- Finally, if you have any sort of signature authority for a company, the entire company becomes subject to FATCA reporting. On the employee side, this can limit your career options. On the private side, it prevents you playing entrepreneur and starting your own little company.
In any and all of these cases: Unless the local bank has thousands of Americans for customers, they *will* refuse to deal with the FATCA crap. It is a huge hassle for them.
Next to last: If you actually read the documents that FATCA requires you (the end customer) to sign, they are pretty horrifying. The bank not only shares your data with the US government, they have the right to share it with undesignated third parties, without any further notice to you. This is meant to cover any intermediate banks, but it isn't actually restricted in any way - they could post your data on the Internet, for all that you can do about it. In the case of any damages due to a data breach, you (the end customer) carry full responsibility, i.e., you have no recourse against the government, the banks, or anyone else.
Finally: sure, hand in your citizenship. So many of us did that they quintupled the fees to slow down the flood. It now costs more than $2000, which is just insane! There are a lot of people out in the world who cannot possibly afford to pay more than $2k just to get rid of a crappy citizenship.
bradley13 at October 18, 2016 5:25 AM
More on how this affects people here - from Matt Welch about his wife's small income from freelance articles:
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/04/17/the_irs_turns_b.html
And then:
Amy Alkon at October 18, 2016 5:31 AM
Boris Johnson, the former Lord Mayor of London, ran into the same problem. Born in New York, his parents moved the family to London when he was five years old. Forty years later he sold a house he had bought in London. The IRS came calling; asking for the tax on the capital gains. He settled and then renounced his U.S. citizenship.
www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/02/boris-Johnson-renounces-us-citizenship-tax-bill-mayor-london/385554/
Canvasback at October 18, 2016 7:46 AM
Isab the law requires banks to give info to the US government on non US citizens if they are married to US citizens
Stay at home spouses earning nothing must give over all their spouses financial info, which as was pointed out can be shared with god only knows who.
My question though, under what right can the US government force foreign companies to comply with a US law?
How is it the government can force ten's of thousands of banks to comply, but they can't make Apple and Samsung stop using child slave labor to make smart phones?
lujlp at October 18, 2016 12:21 PM
Isab, I've got to go with the other commenters here. The reason why: the U.S. is doing something here that no other country does, and it creates a huge dis-motivation for doing business with American citizens. And it's an extension of the other unique U.S. tax policy, which is taxing all of the worldwide income of U.S. citizens, another dumb idea that puts Americans at a competitive disadvantage when doing business abroad. Further, Hillary is looming with capital controls. She's promised in her campaign ads to impose a punitive exit tax on anyone who renounces their citizenship -- if you renounce, the U.S. government will seize nearly all of your assets. We may as well put up a Berlin Wall around the country.
Cousin Dave at October 18, 2016 12:38 PM
How does a U.S. law compel foreign governments to comply? Why doesn't France, for instance, just say, "Fuck you!" to the U.S. government and not report what Americans are making?
Patrick at October 18, 2016 12:43 PM
To boil things down a bit (and lose quite a bit of detail) the US already has treaties involving banking rules with a number of nations. So essentially the US government passed a law and then told all those nations either comply with this new law or we are revoking our treaty. Said treaty probably covers a number of different things like trade, immigration, and other diplomatic issues.
As for why some nations don't say F-U, some have. Notably China, Russia, and I think Switzerland.
Ben at October 18, 2016 2:14 PM
Ben, i believe they put the screws to Switzerland too.
What most of you dont seem to realize is that internally within the US, states play this game too.
They will use the income you make working temporarily in a state, or money your lower earning spouse makes to try and get their tax hooks into all income you both make in every state.
My point was never that these are good laws, or that they dont discourage foreign banks from doing business with Americans.
My point was that the people whining about this, ordinary middle class people who are living overseas, can cheaply and easily avoid this, by not having their name on a foreign bank account, and doing their banking from a bank located in the US which is also required by law to report everything to the IRS.
Isab at October 18, 2016 2:51 PM
". And it's an extension of the other unique U.S. tax policy, which is taxing all of the worldwide income of U.S. citizens, another dumb idea that puts Americans at a competitive disadvantage when doing business abroad."
But they dont tax* all *income earned abroad. There is a nice 100k plus exclusion for Americans living and working overseas.
It doesnt apply to US government employees, but contractors, and Americans working for foreign companies can take advantage of it.
You also get a credit for foreign taxes paid.
I know, math is hard....:-)
Isab at October 18, 2016 3:30 PM
To all you ignoramus idiots out there who clearly do not understand how a real American could ever choose to voluntarily not return to the good ole land of the free (sic), let me explain:
I was born and raised in Wis. but moved to New Zealand over 40 years ago because that's where my husband was from and it was easier for me to move than for him to move the the USA.
Fast forward four decades and I am a dual citizen who works and pays all my relevant taxes in the country where I reside. I do not (and have not for decades) have any sort of USA bank account/financial connections/credit cards, etc. For all the years I was a stay at home mother, I had zero income; since returning to the work force I have never even approached earning half of what I would need to earn before the IRS would be able to collect a dime.
This year, scared shitless about the possible impact of FATCA, I hired a specialist tax accountant (believe me, the forms are not for the faint hearted and your average tax preparer can't do this work) and spent over $3000 to bring myself into compliance (which involved preparing the last five years of returns) to find that I owed the American people (wait for it, drum roll): exactly $0.00.
My choices from now on are to: 1) quickly renounce my citizenship (another $3000 BTW)as you can only renounce if you are tax compliant or 2) keep paying $1000/year to the accountant (it'll be cheaper now I'm up to date).
As my husband is already retired and has no plans to ever visit the US again, he has chosen to ignore the whole thing and take his chances. I however am still working and have family remaining hence my 'cooperation'. But once I'm retired I too will be giving the IRS a giant middle finger.
As to why countries comply with this, it's easy: the US threatens trade sanctions/banking restrictions, etc. until the respective foreign governments cave. Let's face it expatriates don't carry enough votes to counter this.
And for those of you who say, "come home then", well that would be nice, but as I'm not a billionaire I can't afford it. I was 20 when I left (so no Social Security/Medicare for me) and at my age (work it out all those math mavens out there) I have pre-existing medical conditions that none of you red, white and blue enthusiasts are going to pay for.
For those of you who still say that the USA is the greatest country in the world and that the American way is always the best, I have a couple of words for you: ostrich, sand.
Keep up the good work Amy, your column is a must read for me!
Robin at October 18, 2016 7:34 PM
I'm an American living in Switzerland and while Switzerland would like to tell the US to stick it in their ear, they haven't.
I don't actually have a Swiss account because I don't work in Switzerland. All my clients are in the US, and I have a US account only. But my husband works here and he has a Swiss account. The bank wouldn't even let me be a co account holder because I don't have a Swiss job.
We have to provide a copy of our US tax returns to our bank every year to prove we're paying taxes.
Not only are we subject to the reporting requirements of FATCA, we still have to pay US taxes. Only one other country in the world taxes it's citizens when they work and live in another country--Eritrea.
It's ridiculous. Every year I pay out about $20k to a country I didn't even step foot in.
Suzanne Lucas at October 18, 2016 11:47 PM
I wish the Swiss banks had the balls to tell the US to stuff it. As others have said: there is no legal basis for the US to demand FATCA compliance.
As I understand it, the trick is this: The US dollar is still (temporarily, we hope), the de facto currency for international exchange. The US gets to decide which banks have access to the dollar exchange in the US (sorry, don't remember the correct term just now). If a bank refuses to comply with FATCA, the US will not allow them to trade in dollars, essentially cutting them off from most international trading. That's death for any bank beyond maybe a local credit union.
There's no legal basis for cutting a bank off, but "might makes right". Basically, it's blackmail.
This is a big reason that other currencies are being used more and more for international trading. The US has pissed everyone off, and long-term pretty much guaranteed that the dollar will lose its supremacy.
bradley13 at October 19, 2016 1:18 AM
An earlier comment caught my eye: "why any American needs an overseas bank account?"
When I told National Bank my perm address was in the UK, they refused to issue a new debit card on the account - makes the US account pretty useless anywhere in the world - even the good ol' US of A. And the noose is tightening in the UK as some institutions no longer do business with US citizens. Sadly, only Trump 'promises' to get rid of FATCA and the real elephant in the room: Citizenship Based Taxation (CBT). USA stands shoulder to shoulder with only Eritrea on CBT.
Mark at October 19, 2016 7:57 AM
"But they dont tax* all *income earned abroad. There is a nice 100k plus exclusion for Americans living and working overseas."
I have been in government contracting for 30 years. I have been briefed hundreds of times on travel and TDY of all sorts. And I have never, ever heard anyone mention this exemption. Who is it available to? I have a colleague who is about to take an extended assignment in Australia, and he's already been warned that his income will be taxed by both countries. There are some deductions, bit they won't overcome the increased tax burden.
And yes, the states have jumped in. We now have a company rule that there are no TDY's longer than 28 days, unless it's leading to a permanent relocation. Every branch of government is grubbing for the very last dollar it can squeeze out of the citizenry.
Also: you still seem to be missing that the FACTA regs effectively prevent you from doing business in the currency of the country where you are, when you are abroad. You get paid in native currency, but then you have to convert it to U.S. dollars to put it into your U.S. bank account. And then when you go to the grocery store, you have to convert it back to the native currency. Paying commissions and fees both ways is more money than the average middle-class person will ever make off of the currency arbitrage (which, in any event, is going to be working against you in one direction or the other).
But here's my biggest objection. Do you know what FACTA really is? It's a backdoor currency control. Its real purpose is to prevent people from earning or moving assets out of the country. Currency controls are a financial Berlin Wall. They are a hallmark of banana republics and Stalinist dictatorships. It's what countries do when they are so horrible that they have to imprison their population in order to prevent mass emigration.
Cousin Dave at October 19, 2016 8:14 AM
Dave, the deduction is available to anyone who can prove that they are resident of a foreign country. For details, see (iirc) Irs form 2555.
The catch: if you are a foreign resident, you are paying income tax in your country of residence. The US taxation is double taxation, it just kicks in at 100k. Depending on where you live, that may not actually be all that much.
a_random_guy at October 19, 2016 11:57 AM
"The catch: if you are a foreign resident, you are paying income tax in your country of residence"
It isnt a deduction it is an exemption, which is much better than a deduction. You need to work overseas for a full year to claim it.
And you dont necessarily pay foreign taxes. . Many foreign countries dont allow you to establsih actual residency in the country unless you are married to a citizen of that country.
And if you do pay foreign taxes there is a foreign tax credit you can claim against your US taxes. Not a deduction, a credit, which is the better of the two options.
Isab at October 19, 2016 3:55 PM
"Paying commissions and fees both ways is more money than the average middle-class person will ever make off of the currency arbitrage "
Get yourself a no foreign transaction fee credit card. A lot of them out there. If you are working for a multi national corporation ask for salary to be direct deposit into a US bank account.
Why do you assume yourself to be so helpless Cousin Dave?
Isab at October 19, 2016 5:58 PM
Leave a comment