College As A Giant Crib Of Hipster-Dressing Crypussies: How The Free Speech Chill Spreads At Smith College
Spotted this story through a Jonathan Haidt tweet:
@JonHaidt
Smith student explains how students learn, within weeks, to walk on eggshells and keep their mouths shut.
Kira Barrett writes at the Smithsophian, the Smith College newspaper, that the year before she entered Smith as a freshman, International Monetary Fund head Christine Lagarde was set to speak there at Commencement. However, Lagarde bowed out of talking after student protests.
I was confused. Lagarde is arguably the most influential woman in the financial world, excelling in what has always been a male-dominated field. How could students at a liberal arts college which prides itself on female empowerment and diversity be so opposed to hearing her speak?That fall, I moved onto campus to begin my college career. During my first days at Smith, I witnessed countless conversations that consisted of one person telling the other that their opinion was wrong. The word "offensive" was almost always included in the reasoning. Within a few short weeks, members of my freshman class had quickly assimilated to this new way of non-thinking. They could soon detect a politically incorrect view and call the person out on their "mistake." I began to voice my opinion less often to avoid being berated and judged by a community that claims to represent the free expression of ideas. I learned, along with every other student, to walk on eggshells for fear that I may say something "offensive." That is the social norm here.
But to be offended by something is not a rational argument. To paraphrase British writer and actor Stephen Fry, being offended does not give a person certain rights or put them on a higher moral ground. It is nothing more than a complaint. Once we are armed with the response "I am offended by that," there is no limit to how far that phrase can take us. One could be offended by nearly anything.
After growing accustomed to this mentality, I understood why Christine Lagarde's presence on the Smith campus was so vehemently opposed. The students who were against her speaking were "offended" by her views and/or the past actions of the organization which she had recently been appointed to lead. I was angry, then sad. In attempting to combat intolerance, we have become intolerant ourselves. We should not only be embarrassed by our actions but also ashamed.
This is the height of babyish stupidity; it is emotionally and intellectually unhealthy; and will not reflect the real-world experiences of these students upon graduation (assuming they don't stay forever on campus like bugs petrified in amber).
I went to hear a talk by Erwin Chemerinsky, UC Irvine Dean of the School of Law, a civil libertarian, and a man who's argued cases before the Supreme Court.
A guy Gregg knows sneered about Chemerinsky's views on Citizens United (which I happen to disagree with), snarling, "How could you go listen to him?"
The answer: After I turned, oh, 6, I stopped needing to have everybody agree with me to feel okay being in their presence.
In fact, dissent makes us better, same as sand in a tumbler polishes a rock but throwing a sponge at it a couple of times just leaves a wet mess on the floor in front of it.








Therein lies the difference between college experience of the 1980's & 90's and what it is today. It will get worse when it filters down to the High Schools, robbing them of any skill needed to become self-aware.
The weirdest part of it is that there is a race to claim a position of the most extreme "powerlessness".The one with the most -ists, wins the argument. Not on merits or anything, just because being the most offended is being granted the most power to silence others.
It will be interesting to see if it runs its logical course and we have tribunals running in academia for thoughtcrime
MrScience at October 31, 2016 10:05 PM
Hey MrScience, so polite of you to elide past the geology that marble is formed by subjecting carbonate rock to high pressure and temperature.
Back on topic - I'm continually offended by crypussy behavior. Why don't my hurt feelings count for anything? Where's my movement? When do I get to pick a personal pronoun?
I hope all this fades away like Werner Erhard and est therapy.
Canvasback at October 31, 2016 11:56 PM
Canvasback, thanks -- I actually know that but wrote this wrong. I was thinking of polishing rocks with sand -- I have one here from a dear departed friend, and I had a rock polishing kit as a kid.
Going to change that in the post.
Thanks for the correction.
Version before change:
Amy Alkon at November 1, 2016 4:41 AM
Within a few short weeks, members of my freshman class had quickly assimilated to this new way of non-thinking. They could soon detect a politically incorrect view and call the person out on their "mistake." I began to voice my opinion less often to avoid being berated and judged by a community that claims to represent the free expression of ideas. I learned, along with every other student, to walk on eggshells for fear that I may say something "offensive."
That being true, they certainly aren't going to get much of an education there when there is so much knowledge and thought that they're not permitted to even be aware of. And yet knowing that, they'll continue to tolerate that and walk on eggshells for the full four years. Do they value the education as much as they do the credential?
Ken R at November 1, 2016 6:36 AM
Kira is slow. She should have learned that in junior high.
And MrScience, too late. It already has.
Ben at November 1, 2016 6:42 AM
Thoughtcrime trials for badthoughts?
https://www.adflegal.org/detailspages/case-details/adams-v.-trustees-of-the-university-of-north-carolina-wilmington
I R A Darth Aggie at November 1, 2016 6:55 AM
When it all goes bad, the SJWs will whine, "We just wanted things to be nice for everyone!" No, they didn't. They are Cluster B's, and Cluster B's have the ability to lie through their teeth and sleep soundly at night. Political correctness is not an unfortunate side effect of good intentions. Everything that's happening at Smith, and other schools, is going according to plan.
Cousin Dave at November 1, 2016 7:01 AM
Guess what happens when College Republicans post a sign saying "Safe spaces are for children"?
http://redalertpolitics.com/2016/10/27/safe-spaces-children-liberals-triggered-college-republicans-sign/
I'm not sure how you equate that with wanting to put people in gas chambers, but whatevs. I'll chip in to a fund to send those ninnies on an all expenses paid trip to the leading countries of the Middle East.
I R A Darth Aggie at November 1, 2016 7:15 AM
Actually, this is false. Lagarde is an apparatchik, a transnational careerist floating on Europe's sea of unaccountable, parasitic quasi-government organizations. The only thing Kira Barrett missed by not hearing Lagarde speak was being propagandized by a a communizing elitist.
Lastango at November 1, 2016 7:44 AM
Amy, I thought it sounded like a miscue. Are you done with the book yet so we can have your full attention? Just kidding.
Canvasback at November 1, 2016 11:32 AM
By the time many people get through high school, they have met their share of people who seemed to go out of their way to piss them off, even to the point that they would spout unpopular views they didn't actually agree with. You get accustomed to the concept that if someone, even someone you admire, says something that pisses you off, they said it solely for that purpose. By the time you get to college, you'd hoped that you had left all those people behind in high school. But here come very successful people to speak at school, and they're going to say something that pisses you off. You think, "If all they want to do is come here and piss me off, why are they coming here at all?"
Fayd at November 1, 2016 4:48 PM
What puzzles me is that when I was at university, if someone got in my face the way I see SJWs on YouTube getting in people's faces and physically getting in the way, how are people *not* replying in kind... i.e. with violence? Sometimes pushing back really is the best way to handle things.
Perry de Havilland at November 2, 2016 8:34 AM
Because you will be punished and they will not Perry. The SJWs have the complete support of the administration. When they take over school facilities it is with the permission of the administration. Try any of these tactics while exposing right wing ideas and you will be kicked out.
Ben at November 2, 2016 10:13 AM
Ben has it. Their world is the world of droit de signeur. Whether an action is right or wrong is determined not by what the action is, but by who is doing it.
Cousin Dave at November 2, 2016 1:22 PM
Leave a comment