Government Didn't Always "Build That"
Karl Zinsmeister explains in the WSJ that, private citizens' charitable groups took on the nation's social problems in the past.
As the subhead puts it, "The classic American virtues were inculcated by philanthropy--and modern reformers can do the same":
Savvy cultural leaders, businessmen, preachers and citizens built philanthropic groups that targeted everything from illiteracy to poverty to moral decay. Men and women, like New York merchants Arthur and Lewis Tappan, launched thousands of energetic charitable groups that collectively became known as the Benevolent Empire. These new charities took on America's toughest problems.• A vast movement to encourage voluntary temperance led by grassroots volunteers who were disproportionately women, as well as pastors and business leaders concerned about the workforce, chopped alcohol consumption to 2.6 gallons per capita from 7.5 gallons, according to U.S. Census data. This was before the government intervened with ill-fated Prohibition edicts.
• Sunday schools provided free literacy instruction and moral training to the half of U.S. children who received no formal schooling at that time.
• Legions of donors and volunteers, including the Tappan brothers, employed a blend of direct mail, legal defense, religious appeal and mass persuasion to make slavery odious to a large group of Americans for the first time, a generation before the government intervened.
• Charitable interventions from groups like the YMCA and American Sunday School Union healed cultural fractures, crime and community breakdown that were the result of immigration, industrialization and migration from small towns to big cities.
• Civil-society campaigns like the Chautauqua movement turned self improvement and continuing education into deep national habits.
We may think of sobriety, industriousness, thrift, neighborliness, self-discipline and truthfulness as classic American virtues, but they were far from universal before philanthropic reformers went to work. American philanthropy today is still capable of leading important alterations in society. Many examples already exist.
The most successful school reforms of the last two decades--charter schools, improved teacher assessment, new digital-learning options, Teach for America and the best STEM programs--were all sparked by philanthropy.
For urgent needs like job training, helping immigrants assimilate, repairing broken families, moving the homeless into the workforce, and fighting drug addiction, today's most effective programs are voluntary efforts run by charitable organizations like the Doe Fund, Habitat for Humanity, Goodwill Industries, and thousands of other grassroots groups. They work because what happens in our hearts, homes and interactions with neighbors are often more effective in shaping the nation than most of what happens in politics or policy.
The problem is that so many people have gotten so dependent on government doing things that need to be done, they take for granted that this is The Way.
Charter Schools are the best modern evidence I see that citizens -- moms and dads who want a good education for their children -- can make a difference where government cannot.
It also creates community when people in an area work together to solve problems in that area. I've seen this in my own neighborhood, with a group of incredible neighbors I'm a part of, working to deal with some problems here. We became real neighbors -- far more so than when we just lived here and weren't working together.
An example of what citizens together can do from "Good Manners for Nice People Who Sometimes Say F*ck":
• Band together and take over for lame-ass government.
When government is failing you, don't sit on your collective hands. Consider doing as a bunch of people did in Hawaii.When Hawaii's Department of Land and Natural Resources didn't have the $4 million it estimated it would take to fix an access road to Kauai's Polihale State Park, local businesses and residents banded together and fixed it themselves.
Mallory Simon reported on CNN.com that Ivan Slack of Napali Kayak, who needs the park open to keep his company's doors open, donated resources. Other businesses and residents rounded up machinery and manpower, and together they completed $4 million in roadwork for free in eight days.








private citizens' charitable groups took on the nation's social problems in the past
That's was then. Nowadays, those groups lobby the legislature to dole out more funds for government programs aimed at those social problems.
I'm particularly irked by those erstwhile Christian who seem to think that Jesus called upon Caesar to take care of the poor.
I R A Darth Aggie at December 16, 2016 6:16 AM
"private citizens' charitable groups took on the nation's social problems in the past"
And will do so again. As soon as they have the kind of legal immunity that government enjoys.
About the time that I was born, a group of parents got together and built a public swimming pool for the kids in our small Wyoming town.
It wasnt fancy and it wasnt heated. Swimming was free the day after they cleaned it and refilled it.
However it was affordable and nice. Most of us were up there three or four times a week in the summer.
The baseball and softball fields were built the same way. Through philanthropic organizations. Government does all that now because it gives them power and control. They have stacked the legal system so government is the only group that can afford the potential legal liability.
When we change the legal system, private organizations will be back in business, and the towns can concentrate on public utilities and policing. Although, in my opinion most of those shoild be privatized also.
Isab at December 16, 2016 7:52 AM
In the early days of the industrial revolution in the US, factories (that weren't too noisy) had readers to keep boredom at bay. They read aloud the bible, Dickens, the newspaper, everything. Self-improvement was a big thing. Traveling lecturers on science, history, geography etc would fill concert halls with people eager to learn.
cc at December 16, 2016 11:24 AM
Look no further than the modern "progressive." Sunday's column by Clarance Page mocked Republicans for still believing in the "quaint and old fashioned idea of self help."
Yes, taking care of yourself is so passe to liberals. Look to the government for that.
Jay at December 16, 2016 2:40 PM
I think Clarence Page had one good point at least (I'm not saying anything about the rest of the column):
Ben Carson: "(Poverty) is really more of a choice than anything else."
Page: "That might be true for those of us who were born poor but fortunate enough to have resources at hand, such as a fully functional family and good schools. But what do you do for those who were not born so lucky?"
Or, as old-fashioned liberal Wendy Kaminer once said:
"I believe in the welfare state. People think I'm conservative because there are messages about self-reliance in my work, and I value self-reliance, but I don't expect it of children."
lenona at December 17, 2016 9:37 AM
Btw, in the early-mid 1990s, the Tightwad Gazette mentioned an upcoming book by Zinsmeister that said, in part, that baby boomers are NOT worse off than their parents were - they just have less financial discipline in general, especially when it came to distinguishing wants from needs. I couldn't find any titles that sounded like such a book. Did he ever publish it?
lenona at December 17, 2016 9:40 AM
Alexis de Tocqueville pointed the charitable nature of Americans in the 1830s. Unlike Europe, Americans have always been perhaps the most charitable and open country, forming private alliances and organizations to help out others in their community. I wish more people would read and reflect on Democracy in America.
cars
BobN at December 18, 2016 6:53 PM
Leave a comment