'We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases."
Four pieces of subhuman filth, who happen to be black, kidnapped and tortured a white special needs male, forcing him to drink from a toilet and say things like "Fuck white people" and "fuck Donald Trump."
Patrick
at January 5, 2017 12:08 AM
Oh, and it's not a hate crime because it happened to a white person:
I rarely say this, but those four need to be put down. Humanely, if we must, but put down. Not only are they sick and sadistic, completely without empathy and utterly incapable of acquiring any, but they're also extremely stupid.
How does anyone who does such a thing navigate through life thinking that it's a good idea to post this on Facebook?
What, if anyone knows, did they think was going to happen when they posted this on Facebook? Did they think their friends would say, "Wow! That's cool! Way to stick to those Trump supporters."?
Did they actually think no one who saw this video wouldn't be a little concerned for the innocent man they were torturing and call the police?
Patrick
at January 5, 2017 5:13 AM
Or, as I like to say keep humping that chicken.
Smug liberalism is a problem: unfortunately, smug liberals will be the last identity group to admit it. In the meantime, Trump will be happy to continue profiting from the resentment said smugness inspires.
Unrelated topic, but I was Googling the demands of Black Lives Matter, trying to find an official statement.
I found this, on a website called "A Movement for Black Lives."
I don't know that Black Lives Matter is affiliated with or endorses this, but the demands are nothing short of outrageous. If Black Lives Matter intends to protest until these demands are met, then they will be protesting until the end of time.
Even if they could one day elect a congress that would endorse this, there is the matter of the court challenges some of this would undoubtedly face.
I'm not the expert Isab and JD are, but I'm guessing this would be challenged under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
For instance, under "Reparations," it says,
1. Reparations for the systemic denial of access to high quality educational opportunities in the form of full and free access for all Black people (including undocumented and currently and formerly incarcerated people) to lifetime education including: free access and open admissions to public community colleges and universities, technical education (technology, trade and agricultural), educational support programs, retroactive forgiveness of student loans, and support for lifetime learning programs.[added emphasis]
So, free tuition for community colleges, universities and trade schools, without admission requirements, but just for black people?
And the second one under "Reparations" is even better.
2. Reparations for the continued divestment from, discrimination toward and exploitation of our communities in the form of a guaranteed minimum livable income for all Black people, with clearly articulated corporate regulations. [added emphasis]
So, if black people choose not to work, then the government will give them a livable income anyway.
So, where is the incentive to get a job and start working?
Patrick
at January 5, 2017 6:49 AM
How does anyone who does such a thing navigate through life thinking that it's a good idea to post this on Facebook?
Eight years of Age-of-Obama entitlement, with the near-daily examples of a lawless president and his administration openly racebaiting and agitating, the likes of BLM and Al Sharpton making multiple visits to the White House, all funded and encouraged by vast, entrenched financial interests and insinuated into the culture by (for instance) the crony-capitalist NFL staging a Black-Panther-thug-themed halftime show.
So, why wouldn't these four think they could do anything they wanted to? The only thing they misread was the specific form their privilege and violence is currently allowed to take publicly. It's understandable how they might be thrown off by, say, the way the Mayor of Baltimore was lionized nationally by the MSM after she "gave those who wished to destroy space to do that" during riots there.
All of which is why I've never been so relieved at the outcome of an election.
Lastango
at January 5, 2017 7:27 AM
“It’s good to have strong women around a man. To teach him to respect women. He doesn’t have a male person in his life saying ‘don’t cry’ or ‘you throw like a girl,'” she told the publication. “All those s—ty things dads accidentally do.”
Four pieces of subhuman filth, who happen to be black, kidnapped and tortured a white special needs male, forcing him to drink from a toilet and say things like "Fuck white people" and "fuck Donald Trump."
Patrick at January 5, 2017 12:08 AM
Oh, and it's not a hate crime because it happened to a white person:
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/04/chicago-police-hesitate-to-call-videotaped-torture-of-white-man-a-hate-crime/
Sixclaws at January 5, 2017 4:53 AM
I rarely say this, but those four need to be put down. Humanely, if we must, but put down. Not only are they sick and sadistic, completely without empathy and utterly incapable of acquiring any, but they're also extremely stupid.
How does anyone who does such a thing navigate through life thinking that it's a good idea to post this on Facebook?
What, if anyone knows, did they think was going to happen when they posted this on Facebook? Did they think their friends would say, "Wow! That's cool! Way to stick to those Trump supporters."?
Did they actually think no one who saw this video wouldn't be a little concerned for the innocent man they were torturing and call the police?
Patrick at January 5, 2017 5:13 AM
Or, as I like to say keep humping that chicken.
http://reason.com/blog/2017/01/03/just-what-the-country-needed-yet-another
I R A Darth Aggie at January 5, 2017 6:38 AM
Unrelated topic, but I was Googling the demands of Black Lives Matter, trying to find an official statement.
I found this, on a website called "A Movement for Black Lives."
I don't know that Black Lives Matter is affiliated with or endorses this, but the demands are nothing short of outrageous. If Black Lives Matter intends to protest until these demands are met, then they will be protesting until the end of time.
Even if they could one day elect a congress that would endorse this, there is the matter of the court challenges some of this would undoubtedly face.
I'm not the expert Isab and JD are, but I'm guessing this would be challenged under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
For instance, under "Reparations," it says,
So, free tuition for community colleges, universities and trade schools, without admission requirements, but just for black people?
And the second one under "Reparations" is even better.
So, if black people choose not to work, then the government will give them a livable income anyway.
So, where is the incentive to get a job and start working?
Patrick at January 5, 2017 6:49 AM
Eight years of Age-of-Obama entitlement, with the near-daily examples of a lawless president and his administration openly racebaiting and agitating, the likes of BLM and Al Sharpton making multiple visits to the White House, all funded and encouraged by vast, entrenched financial interests and insinuated into the culture by (for instance) the crony-capitalist NFL staging a Black-Panther-thug-themed halftime show.
So, why wouldn't these four think they could do anything they wanted to? The only thing they misread was the specific form their privilege and violence is currently allowed to take publicly. It's understandable how they might be thrown off by, say, the way the Mayor of Baltimore was lionized nationally by the MSM after she "gave those who wished to destroy space to do that" during riots there.
All of which is why I've never been so relieved at the outcome of an election.
Lastango at January 5, 2017 7:27 AM
http://smokeroom.com/2017/01/04/proud-single-mom-january-jones-says-her-son-doesnt-need-a-dad-to-around-teaching-him-sy-things/
Sixclaws at January 5, 2017 11:07 AM
Can you spot the typo on this poster?
https://twitter.com/samthielman/status/817022669564551168
Sixclaws at January 5, 2017 1:39 PM
Remember this guy Sixclaws?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/20-years-later-it-turns-out-dan-quayle-was-right-about-murphy-brown-and-unmarried-moms/2012/05/25/gJQAsNCJqU_story.html?utm_term=.44885d25b1d5
Of course if you do not need assistance financially, as a sounding point for advice/guidance, or even to rub your back then of course you go it alone.
Bob in Texas at January 5, 2017 1:46 PM
I'm guessing that the "typo" you're referring to is the fact that the feminist march group is in the shape of a male symbol.
Patrick at January 5, 2017 2:21 PM
Great piece from Victor Davis Hanson on the two California's.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443466/california-madness-hypocritical-coastal-elites-soak-middle-class?utm_content=buffer8b13d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Sheep Mom at January 5, 2017 2:48 PM
Sorry for the typo! No apostrophe needed!
Sheep Mom at January 5, 2017 2:48 PM
Lenona might like this one, Amy might adore it.
Via Flanagan.
Crid at January 5, 2017 4:59 PM
I've seen it already, thanks. I like the Atlantic.
lenona at January 5, 2017 5:11 PM
Leave a comment