Arnold Schwarzenegger admits he once expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler after publicly denying it for years:

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/arnold-admits-expressed-admiration-hitler-article-1.1177364

Loved this: https://twitter.com/Super70sSports/status/899081199326564357

Is it because the Moon is white?

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/20/the-eclipse-is-racist-because-it-fails-to-affect-enough-black-people-the-atlantic-suggests/

Brilliant, from Iowahawk (David Burge):

https://twitter.com/iowahawkblog/status/899671553692102656

Not mine but the link is locked up.

The Bread Danger

1. More than 98% of convicted felons are bread eaters.
2. Fully HALF of all children who grow up in bread-consuming households score below average on standardized tests.
3. In the 18th century when virtually all bread was baked in the home the average life expectancy was less than 50 years. Infant mortality rates were unacceptably high. Many women died in child birth. Diseases such as typhoid, yellow fever, and influenza ravaged whole nations.
4. More than 90% of violent crimes are committed withing 24 hours of eating bread.
5. Bread is made from a substance called 'dough'. It has been proven that as little as one pound of dough can be used to suffocate a mouse. The average person eats more bread than that in one month!
6. Bread has been proven to be addictive. Subjects deprived of bread and given only water to eat begged for bread after only two days.

Proposed Restrictions
1. No sale of bread to minors.
2. No advertising bread within 1000 ft of a school.
3. A 300% federal tax on all bread to pay for the societal ills we might associate with bread.
4. No animal or human images, nor any primary colors (which may attract children) may be used to promote bread usage.
5. A $40.2 billion fine on the three biggest bread manufacturers.

Remember: "Think globally, act idiotically."

wow 213 days into trump's presidency and the sun is completely blocked out - let that sink in:

https://twitter.com/maxwelltani/status/899681823629901825

The slippery slope continues.

Christopher Columbus monument in Baltimore smashed to combat ‘white supremacy’:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/21/christopher-columbus-monument-in-baltimore-smashed/

Uh-oh

https://twitter.com/ShangHiiieee/status/899038044967190528

When deaf people hear for the first time.

https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan/status/899384155116580864

Antifa will zoom in on this statue

https://twitter.com/OffencePolice/status/899031817214242816

BLM encounters antifa. Hilarity ensues.

https://twitter.com/UncleChangNYC/status/899373007621246976

And the slope continues to get even more slippery.

Man tried planting bomb on Confederate statue in Houston, feds say:

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas/2017/08/21/man-tried-planting-bomb-confederate-statue-houston-feds-say

Heh.

Is there anything men can do right or that is pleasing to women? Don't be too nice or you're a beta. Don't be mean or you're a jerk or a misogynist. No wonder more and more men are walking away from relationships.

https://pjmedia.com/drhelen/2017/08/16/nice-guys-really-bad/

Confederate statues shoot 63, killing 9.

"Arnold Schwarzenegger admits he once expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler"

How is this important?

Let me rephrase that.

"How is this important, and can I get any comedy mileage out of it?".

> Confederate statues shoot 63, killing 9.

Great headline Gog!

It's a sign of an empire in decline when people are more concerned about statues than dealing with actual problems.

All this time, I never realized that Patrick and Charles are the acme of evolution.

http://www.dallasvoice.com/gay-people-higher-form-evolution-10240445.html

Who's Charles? Is it too late to oppress him socially?

Who's Charles? Is it too late to oppress him socially?

For those of you who talk about alcohol being legal to justify legalizing other drugs, listen to Claudia Christian. This is a very beautiful, seriously intelligent woman who was... watch the video.
Listen carefully for the word, "millions". It's a far larger disaster than we think, hoisting a Bud Light during the game.
This is why I insist that using alcohol legalization as justification for legalizing other drugs is fallacious. Explain the ROI for your drug of choice, please.

"Explain the ROI for your drug of choice, please."

Fewer women being sexual assaulted by the police on the side of the road.

Rad, many of us who are willing to legalize things recognize there is a cost in money, lives, and dignity associated with that. But there is a cost associated with prohibition as well. The question is which cost is greater. Especially considering how complete prohibition is not possible. As you often say they are willing to do anything to get that next fix. The rest of us aren't able to protect them from themselves.

Charles has posted on here before, Crid. Of course, if I remember correctly, he actually uses all lower case: "charles"

"Rad, many of us who are willing to legalize things recognize there is a cost in money, lives, and dignity associated with that. But there is a cost associated with prohibition as well. The question is which cost is greater."

Hence my asking that you be alert for the term, "millions".

Legalization doesn't make this problem go away.

"Fewer women being sexual assaulted by the police on the side of the road."
Really? There are certainly more rapes of women (and men) by others under the influence of alcohol than any police-state fantasist can imagine.

Try again. There was no thought out into that one.

There is a vast difference between rape by a drugged up citizen and rape by a completely sober police officer who is just 'doing their job'. We had a post about this just a few days ago. It isn't that people like me are refusing to recognize the millions harmed by drugs it is that you Rad are unwilling to recognize the millions harmed by our police due to prohibition.

Explain the ROI for your drug of choice, please.

If the government can tell you how much f a substance you are legally allowed to have due to the harm is causes you or the cost to society, how long until that substance is sugar, or beef, or cheese

At what point do you see the authoritarians telling us what to do deciding 'we have enough power now, we dont need anymore'?

"...millions harmed by our police due to prohibition.

Wow. Millions. Have you heard of post hoc, ergo propter hoc?

And luj: ROI evaluation tallies the pluses and minuses. It's not just one observation of "slippery slope".

And yet, fully armed SWAT teams replete with flashbang grenades breach farmers markets and dinner parties over dairy products

And that is the real issue highlighted right there Rad. You refuse to admit there are any harms associated with prohibition no matter how blatant and obvious they are. Instead you say if people would only stop wanting to violate the prohibition then all those problems would go away. A pretty naive viewpoint. And the same people on the other side say they will continue to violate the prohibition no matter what.

No, your fallacy does not apply here. And yes, millions. Just like your millions.