The Lady Who Came Up With "White Privilege" Should Have Called It "Wealthy As Hell Privilege"
William Ray writes at Quillette
The concept of 'white privilege' was popularized by Peggy McIntosh in a 1989 paper written at Harvard University and titled, "White Privilege: Unpacking The Invisible Knapsack." It was written as a personal, experiential essay, and it details 26 ways in which McIntosh's skin color has been decisive in determining her life outcomes. This hugely influential paper has been responsible for the subsequent proliferation of a rigidly enforced theory of privilege throughout social movements and university classrooms. So central has this doctrine become to progressive politics, pedagogy, and activism, that to even question its validity is to invite the inquisitorial wrath of 'social justice' radicals. But it is for this very reason that it is important to subject McIntosh's ideas to scrutiny.
Ray continues:
Peggy McIntosh was born Elisabeth Vance Means in 1934. She grew up in Summit, New Jersey where the median income is quadruple the American national average--that is to say that half the incomes there are more than four times the national average, some of them substantially so. McIntosh's father was Winthrop J. Means, the head of Bell Laboratories electronic switching department during the late 1950s. At that time, Bell Labs were the world leaders in the nascent digital computing revolution. Means personally held--and sold patents on--many very lucrative technologies, including early magnetic Gyro-compass equipment (U.S. Patent #US2615961A) which now helps to guide nuclear missiles and commercial jets, and which keeps satellites in place so you can navigate with your phone and communicate with your Uber driver. Means is also recorded as the inventor of a patent held by Nokia Bell in 1959 known as the Information Storage Arrangement. This device is the direct progenitor of ROM computer memory, and is cited in the latter's patent filed in 1965 for IBM. So, long before Peggy McIntosh wrote her paper, her family was already having an outsized effect on Western culture.Elizabeth Vance Means then attended Radcliffe, a renowned finishing school for the daughters of America's patrician elites, and continued her private education at the University of London (ranked in the top 50 by the Times Higher Education World University Rankings), before completing her English Doctorate at Harvard. Her engagement to Dr. Kenneth McIntosh was announced in the New York Times's social register on the same page as the wedding of Chicago's Mayor Daley. McIntosh's father, Dr. Rustin McIntosh, was Professor Emeritus of Pediatrics at Columbia University. His mother was President Emeritus of Barnard College, an institution in the opulent Morningside Heights district of Manhattan, famous since 1889 for providing the daughters of the wealthiest Americans with liberal arts degrees. This was once the stomping ground of American cultural luminaries like F. Scott Fitzgerald, Cecil B. DeMille, and several Supreme Court Justices. Kenneth McIntosh was himself a graduate of the Phillips Exeter Academy, which boasted alumni including Daniel Webster, the sons of Presidents Lincoln and Grant, and a number of Rockefeller scions. He later completed his elite education at Harvard College and the Harvard Medical School. By the time of his marriage to Elizabeth, Kenneth McIntosh was a senior resident at the prestigious Brigham Hospital in Boston, founded by millionaire Peter Bent.
In other words, Peggy McIntosh was born into the very cream of America's aristocratic elite, and has remained ensconced there ever since. Her 'experiential' list enumerating the ways in which she benefits from being born with white skin simply confuses racial privilege with the financial advantages she has always been fortunate enough to enjoy. Many of her points are demonstrably economic. One is left to wonder why, given her stated conviction that she has unfairly benefited from her skin color, there seems to be no record of her involvement in any charity or civil rights work. If she did take to the streets in support of some cause or other, she left no trace that I can see. Nor, as far as I can tell, has she spent any time teaching the underprivileged or working directly to better anyone's condition but her own. Instead, she has contented herself with a generous six figure salary, and has not shown any particular eagerness to hand her position over to a more deserving person of color.
Very few of the people reading this article--whatever the color of their skin--will have even the vaguest idea of the comfort and privilege in which Peggy McIntosh grew up and to which she has since become accustomed. Nor will we have access to the world of opportunities that she has been fortunate enough to enjoy. But even though the lifetime of privilege McIntosh has experienced is almost certainly due to her wealth and not the colour of her skin, she nevertheless found a way to share this irksome burden with the illiterate children of Kentucky coal miners, the hopeless peasants of the Appalachians, poor single mothers struggling to make ends meet on welfare, and the vast majority of whites in the United States and throughout the world who never had the chance to attend Radcliffe or Harvard. She simply reclassified her manifest economic advantage as racial privilege and then dumped this newly discovered original sin onto every person who happens to share her skin color. Without, of course, actually redistributing any of the wealth that, by her own account, she had done nothing to deserve.
Why is this so important...beyond the accusations of using "microaggressions" and the expectations that individuals of one color step aside and shut up for individuals of another...based on something they have no control over...the shade of their skin?
Well, Ray explains later in the piece how identity politics lead to genocide.
Okay, so maybe not tomorrow or next week here in America, but that is the direction in which we are pointed. And because identity politics is a form of secular religion, people are likely to cling to their beliefs and not give them the bath in reason that they direly need.
via @mitchpberg








If this essay was intended to inform where this concept comes from, the author would have been better served to avoid weasel words.
How many is "many"? For that matter, what are these points that he tells us are "demonstrably economic"? I'd like to look at them for myself rather than taking him at his word.
Patrick at October 30, 2018 3:40 AM
I found her essay. And no one but National SEED project is allowed to electronically publish it, so I will not even excerpt it.
Patrick at October 30, 2018 4:51 AM
> identity politics lead to genocide. Okay, so maybe
> not tomorrow or next week here in America, but
> that is the direction in which we are pointed.
Yet people think I'm crazy to say we're heading towards a civil war.
Snoopy at October 30, 2018 4:54 AM
There's actually fair use, Patrick, no matter what the piece says, so you can excerpt pieces from it for discussion. You're not republishing them to take money away from her that she would have otherwise earned. For purposes of criticism, fair use allows excerpting.
Amy Alkon at October 30, 2018 6:40 AM
Too many people conflate rich with white and poor with black. The children of Denzel Washington or Beyoncé have more "privilege" in their lives than the children of an Appalachian coal miner will ever know.
Conan the Grammarian at October 30, 2018 7:13 AM
There is also such a thing as "looking respectable" privilege. There was an online essay (sorry can't find) by a young black man who put on a coat and tie and went about his day. He was shocked (shocked I tell you) to discover that people held the door open for him, were nice to him, did not shy away from him. He simply could not compute that people might be reacting to "slovenly, dangerous looking young black men are dangerous" rather than just his skin color.
If you see someone who is dressed nice with a nice haircut, it is reasonable to assume that they are not dangerous. The class "middle class white male nicely dressed" is exactly the group who one can assume knows how to get things done, can be asked for directions, will be helpful, and won't rob you. This stereotype is almost always true, so why should not people react positively to such people?
On the other hand, there is a certain look of disorganized chaos that signals "crazy" and this stereotype is also mostly true.
cc at October 30, 2018 7:30 AM
I particularly like Sara Jeong talking about #cancelwhitepeople because those poor whites are so privileged compared to her. She went to Berkeley and Harvard but the whites could have gone to Southeast Kentucky Community College. It is sooooo unfair that she was not given the same opportunity.
Curtis at October 30, 2018 9:23 AM
John Molloy, of "Dress for Success" fame, told a similar story. A black pastor approached him at a seminar and told Molloy that he often travelled to different areas of the country. In those areas where he thought racism might be an issue, he added a nice brief case to his outfit. He told Molloy that without it, he was a black man in a suit, but with it, he was an executive and was mostly left alone.
Conan the Grammarian at October 30, 2018 1:19 PM
Leave it to Will. Hamlet, Act 1 Scene 3:
Polonius:
Costly thy habit as thy purse can buy,
But not expressed in fancy—rich, not gaudy,
For the apparel oft proclaims the man,
I R A Darth Aggie at October 30, 2018 1:52 PM
How much of her privilege was also due to her sex?
How much of the privilege she mentions is true of any majority population of any country?
lujlp at October 30, 2018 9:30 PM
Look, yes, all other factors being equal, I do think white skin gets you more trust in majority white countries.
That said, "X privilege" has become a shut-down tactic to any debate and a way to just stop people from talking or having opinions. It is messed up.
NicoleK at October 31, 2018 5:39 AM
For White Woman Privilege read Rick Bragg's The Best Cook in the World
tmitsss at October 31, 2018 6:32 AM
Leave a comment