Great Having A Top-Notch Businessman And His Cronies In The White House
The Trump administration paid a price four times higher for ventilators than the Obama admin had already contracted for, write Patricia Callahan and Sebastian Rotella at Propublica. Trump's peeps were "gullible" and didn't negotiate in the slightest:
A U.S. subsidiary of Royal Philips N.V. received millions in federal tax dollars years ago to develop a low-cost ventilator for pandemics but didn't deliver it. Instead, as the coronavirus began spreading around the globe and U.S. hospitals were desperate for more, Philips was selling commercial versions of the government-funded ventilator overseas from its Pennsylvania factory. Then in April, despite having not fulfilled the initial contract, the Dutch company struck a much more lucrative deal to sell the government 43,000 ventilators for four times the price.Under this new deal, ventilators that the Obama administration had agreed to buy for $3,280 each suddenly cost $15,000. When the deal was announced in April, neither HHS nor Philips would say how the more expensive ventilators differed from the cheaper ones.
It turns out that they were "functionally identical," according to investigators with the House Committee on Oversight and Reform's Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy, and the "waste of taxpayer funds" may have reached $500 million.
The investigators reviewed thousands of pages of emails and other records obtained from Philips and concluded that "inept contract management and incompetent negotiating by the Trump Administration denied the country the ventilators it needed." And the subcommittee's report, which it shared with the inspector general's office, named names: Peter Navarro, President Donald Trump's director of trade and manufacturing policy, was the administration's point man on the deal. In addition, Jared Kushner, the president's son-in-law and senior adviser, and HHS Secretary Alex Azar participated in calls with Philips' executives.
Details:
Among the most surprising findings of the investigation was an email communication between the company and the government on the day the U.S. reported its first coronavirus case. On Jan. 21, a Philips manager sent a news story about that case to an HHS contracting officer and asked "how we could help out or if you may expect a need to accelerate any shipments." Yet nobody from the federal government responded to Philips for six weeks, the investigators found.On March 4, the HHS contracting officer told Philips managers in an email that Azar's office had directed him to "expedite production of the ventilators." Philips responded the same day suggesting a contract modification "to allow for the earlier shipments."
Rather than speed up delivery, though, the modification Philips suggested gave the company until September 2022 to deliver any of the stockpile ventilators. Still, HHS signed off on the deal, the investigators found.
"Philips appears to have duped the Administration into thinking that this amendment, which permits a lengthy delay, was necessary for it to expedite production," the congressional investigators wrote.
That same month, as the administration sought to cut a new deal, a Philips executive shared with Azar the slide deck he planned to present to Navarro. In the presentation, Philips described the government-funded stockpile ventilator design as "the best solution to confront exactly the pandemic we are facing."
However, Philips soon steered Navarro and his colleagues to a more expensive option, the $15,000 Trilogy EV300, saying in one email to an associate director in Navarro's office that this hospital ventilator had "more clinician friendly screens."
Yet, the House investigators found the screens of the pricier model were identical to the less-expensive stockpile version. "The Administration's willingness to spend hundreds of millions of extra dollars for non-existent 'more clinician-friendly screens' constitutes waste," they wrote.
The White House negotiators were "gullible," the investigators wrote, "and conceded to Philips on all significant matters, including price." The contract called for Philips to make monthly deliveries between April and December 2020 with more than half arriving in the final three months.
"Gullible."
Nobody's money spends like other people's money.
So many people are actually "self-servants" who get elected to public service and basically phone the job in.
This probably happens in all administrations, much as I am not a fan of the orange man and these, yes, gullible, cavalier-with-public-money twits.








This topic is sort of in my wheel house.
First off, government contracting is an unholy mess, but the general rule is that goods cannot be preordered and stored for years,
I’m sure there are exceptions for pandemic preparedness but still the government can’t hold a contractor to an absurdly low price four or five years after the agreement.
I am mystified how it would be possible to enforce an Omaha era contract if it was a straight up federal purchase order four years after the fact.
My understanding is that ventilators have a pretty short shelf life. Didn’t California have a bunch that were sold off when they weren’t used?
So, a lot of info about exactly what happed is kind of missing here.
This entire story kind of snells.
Ventilators were never going to save more than a few people. They may have killed more than they helped, so yea, a pretty big boondoggle driven by the so called medical experts.
Not the first, and won’t be the last.
Isab at August 24, 2020 2:24 AM
Apparently, "contract" didn't really mean anything, then.
Radwaste at August 24, 2020 3:41 AM
It is terrible but when I see 'House Committee' I start wondering just how much is real and how much is just partisan politics. Pelosi has dragged the reputation of congress even lower, an amazing accomplishment.
Ben at August 24, 2020 7:01 AM
Apparently, "contract" didn't really mean anything, then.
Radwaste at August 24, 2020 3:41 AM
Because the needs of the government can be so changeable in the long term almost all government contracts, even the long term ones contain a cancellation clause where the government has the unilateral ability to cancel a contract for almost any reason. One of those reasons being that the government changes their procurement requirements to another product, or just flat doesn’t have the money.
This is why we aren’t still buying B52’s.
Unfortunately when you run your contracts this way, it also requires that you give the same rights to the contractor. You can’t have a legitimate contract where one party has all the rights.
If the CDC failed to take delivery and pay for the ventilators during the Obama administration they can’t demand that they want them now five years later at the same price. The contract will have to be renegotiated. Looks like it was.
I agree Ben. It looks like political mud slinging to me.
Isab at August 24, 2020 8:31 AM
When you show up in dire straits demanding the good deal you were able to negotiate when things were rosy, you'll find your negotiating partner unsympathetic.
California tried to accuse Oregon and Texas of price gouging when it asked to purchase electricity from them during the rotating brown-outs that led to Grey Davis' ouster and found both states unwilling to give their hard-generated power away. With the current blackouts, the Golden State is in for another lesson in playing poker with a weak hand.
Conan the Grammarian at August 24, 2020 8:44 AM
When you show up in dire straits demanding the good deal you were able to negotiate when things were rosy, you'll find your negotiating partner unsympathetic.
Supply, demand, how does that work? Likely it probably went like so: the government shows up and says "here is our PO, fill it". Vendor looks at it, says "I can't meet the required ship date, sorry".
My understanding is that ventilators have a pretty short shelf life.
They have to be maintained. As I recall, it was Bloomberg in NYC who bought plenty of ventilators for the H1N1 outbreak ~2009. Around 2017 de Blasio sold them because the maintenance was chewing up several million dollars/year.
I R A Darth Aggie at August 24, 2020 11:34 AM
Amy, I definitely can understand not liking Trump. Are you actually going to vote for Biden though?
Trust at August 25, 2020 8:39 AM
"This is why we aren’t still buying B52’s."
Ahhh, sorry I didn't see this.
The total number of B-52s was capped by SALT II, which is why you can see them with wings cut off at Davis-Monthan AFB.
Boeing doesn't have any incentive whatsoever to build new so long as spares are available - as it turns out, several at D-M which still have wings have low-enough total hours to be refurbished and flown.
Radwaste at June 14, 2021 11:05 AM
Leave a comment