Better Living Through Chemistry
In The New York Times, Amy Harmon writes that people are increasingly self-prescribing and managing their lives through medications. Horrors! (Or is it?) I take Ritalin for ADHD, and have been for maybe five life-changing years. But, what if it helps a college student without ADHD focus better? Side effects, for me, are minimal. The benefits are great. Why shouldn't others be allowed to take Ritalin if it makes them more focused and productive?
For a hefty markup, dozens of Web sites fill orders for a drugs, no prescription required, though to do so is not legal. Instead, customers are asked to fill out a form describing themselves and their symptoms, often with all the right boxes helpfully pre-checked.Erin, 26, a slender hair stylist, remembers laughing to herself as she listed her weight as 250 pounds to order Adipex, a diet pill, for $113. One recent night, she took an Adipex to stay up cleaning her house, followed by a Xanax when she needed to sleep.
Like many other self-medicators, Erin, who has been on and off antidepressants and sleeping pills since she was in high school, has considered weaning herself from the pills. She wishes she had opted for chamomile tea instead of the Xanax when she wanted to sleep.
"I feel like I have been so programmed to think, 'If I feel like this then I should take this pill,' " she said. "I hate that."
But the problem with the tea, she said, is the same one she faces when she is coloring hair: "It's not predictable. I know how these drugs are going to affect me. I don't know if the chamomile tea will work."
Online pharmacies are not the only way for determined self-prescribers to get their pills. Suffering from mood swings a decade after his illness was diagnosed as bipolar disorder, Rich R., 31, heard in an online discussion group about an antidepressant not available in the United States. A contractor in the Midwest, Rich scanned an old prescription into his computer, rearranged the information and faxed it to pharmacies in Canada to get the drug.
"My initial experience with physicians who are supposed to be experts in the field was disappointing," Rich said. "So I concluded I can do things better than they can."
I would never trust a doctor's opinion without doing research myself as far as any medication goes. My favorite doctor was the one who flirted with the idea of putting me on lithium! when I was in my 20s...because I mentioned a minor malaise that mainly had to do with my extreme lack of a boyfriend combined with a living situation that resembled grinding poverty, but for the rather obscene rent. I didn't need lithium. I needed a raise, a boytoy, and a move to California.







Oh, boy, are you in trouble now! Tom Cruise is going to come looking for you!
Patrick at November 16, 2005 6:29 AM
"I needed a raise, a boytoy, and a move to California."
Great, now what we need is a service so I can order a girlfiend from Canada.
T at November 16, 2005 12:57 PM
So: who do you blame when an idiot self-medicates thalidomide for acne, then takes her perfect skin out to party and has Flipper in nine months? This drives me nuts, Amy. You know - and have said - that the plural of anecdote is not data, butcha keep posting like everybody will be as sensible as you and perhaps Ms Seipp. Ain't gonna happen.
Radwaste at November 16, 2005 3:43 PM
> that the plural of anecdote
> is not data
Can someone give some more background on this? That sounds like a line worth stealing
Crid at November 17, 2005 12:50 AM
Crid, I saw it first in an argument on an Augusta Chronicle forum, from a fellow who was disgusted that credulous people would cite "miracles" as "evidence" that divine intervention occurs. All that was happening, of course, was that the witness to such events did not know what happened - and did not know even the rudiments of causation.
Radwaste at November 17, 2005 2:26 AM
Ah, but if we didn't let damaged children get born, we wouldn't have the "Flipper" problem, would we? (See other entry from this entry's date.) People should have to bear the consequences of their own bad choices.
Amy Alkon at November 17, 2005 7:38 AM
Did I miss something here? I'm all for not letting "damaged" children be born, in principle, but last time I checked there were all sorts of birth defects that it's not possible to test for. Plus, where do you draw the line at "damaged"? My son was planned, I didn't touch a drop of alcohol or anything else while I was pregnant, I had a wonderful natural birth, and yet, he's still a quirky bundle of various learning disabilities and borderline conditions such as Aspergers...but he's also hilarious, ironic, twisted and interesting. It's not a lot of fun dealing with schools and IEPs, but in many ways I'd rather have him than a high-achieving, perfectly normal kid.
Pat Saperstein at November 17, 2005 10:57 AM
Leave a comment