Just Because You Have Nice Legs Doesn't Mean We Need To See The Spot Where They Meet Your Torso
Eva Fugging Herzigova dresses like she doesn't have two brain cells to rub together, and looks like tacky crap, despite being gorgeous.
As Heather from Go Fug Yourself writes:
I especially enjoy that she has to clutch that piece of fabric between her legs, or tape it there, so that a brisk wind doesn't make her ladyparts a matter of public record. And yet, at this point, why even bother with the modesty flap? Just get Fred Leighton to bling it up and call it jewelry.
It sounds so much more positive when I say it...
eric at May 21, 2006 8:17 AM
Nothing succeeds like excess? Or under the heading of "there's no such thing as bad publicity," I truly believe there are publicists out there who put their clients in these outrageous/tacky ensembles just to get people talking about them.
deja pseu at May 21, 2006 4:18 PM
On the same website, the October 12, 2004 has Lil Kim exhibiting similar issues with near-vaginal exposure. The Fug Girls wrote:
"I'm wondering when we're actually going to see her entire vagina. I'm about to start taking bets. I'll take the under on 6 months. Who's in?"
What's up with Kim lately? I heard her boobs started leaking in prison. Bummer.
Lena's Cooter at May 21, 2006 5:40 PM
1. She's fricking stunning.
2. It's the red carpet, not real life.
3. She's fricking stunning.
4. The y used to say she was a super-introverted heroin addict: we should be glad she can still walk.
5. Women do this whenever some other woman wears something revealing or form-fitting: "That is so not in style." Men reply that some things are ALWAYS in style.
Crid at May 21, 2006 7:55 PM
I dunno, I think she'd look a lot sexier in a little more dress. A tight dress, even. And she is fricking stunning. And I'm all for trashy dressing...when it's done right. Right trash, right time, right place. This is just a sexier version of Bjork and the duck outfit.
Amy Alkon at May 21, 2006 10:58 PM
eva has no secret parts left.
trashy at May 22, 2006 4:04 PM
Leave a comment