Advice Goddess Blog
« Previous | Home | Next »

Who's Afraid Of Dick Cheney?
I have my problems with the LA Times, but problems with the op-ed page aren't among them. It's the best section in the paper, and Monday, I was reminded of that when I read this extraordinary piece by author Sam Harris, who sounds like a liberal yet thinks the liberal view on terror is dangerously stupid:

On questions of national security, I am now as wary of my fellow liberals as I am of the religious demagogues on the Christian right.

This may seem like frank acquiescence to the charge that "liberals are soft on terrorism." It is, and they are.

A cult of death is forming in the Muslim world — for reasons that are perfectly explicable in terms of the Islamic doctrines of martyrdom and jihad. The truth is that we are not fighting a "war on terror." We are fighting a pestilential theology and a longing for paradise.

This is not to say that we are at war with all Muslims. But we are absolutely at war with those who believe that death in defense of the faith is the highest possible good, that cartoonists should be killed for caricaturing the prophet and that any Muslim who loses his faith should be butchered for apostasy.

Unfortunately, such religious extremism is not as fringe a phenomenon as we might hope. Numerous studies have found that the most radicalized Muslims tend to have better-than-average educations and economic opportunities.

In Harris' words below there there are shades of Dennett from the blog post just above:

Given the degree to which religious ideas are still sheltered from criticism in every society, it is actually possible for a person to have the economic and intellectual resources to build a nuclear bomb — and to believe that he will get 72 virgins in paradise. And yet, despite abundant evidence to the contrary, liberals continue to imagine that Muslim terrorism springs from economic despair, lack of education and American militarism.

At its most extreme, liberal denial has found expression in a growing subculture of conspiracy theorists who believe that the atrocities of 9/11 were orchestrated by our own government. A nationwide poll conducted by the Scripps Survey Research Center at Ohio University found that more than a third of Americans suspect that the federal government "assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East;" 16% believe that the twin towers collapsed not because fully-fueled passenger jets smashed into them but because agents of the Bush administration had secretly rigged them to explode.

Such an astonishing eruption of masochistic unreason could well mark the decline of liberalism, if not the decline of Western civilization. There are books, films and conferences organized around this phantasmagoria, and they offer an unusually clear view of the debilitating dogma that lurks at the heart of liberalism: Western power is utterly malevolent, while the powerless people of the Earth can be counted on to embrace reason and tolerance, if only given sufficient economic opportunities.

I don't know how many more engineers and architects need to blow themselves up, fly planes into buildings or saw the heads off of journalists before this fantasy will dissipate. The truth is that there is every reason to believe that a terrifying number of the world's Muslims now view all political and moral questions in terms of their affiliation with Islam. This leads them to rally to the cause of other Muslims no matter how sociopathic their behavior. This benighted religious solidarity may be the greatest problem facing civilization and yet it is regularly misconstrued, ignored or obfuscated by liberals.

...We are entering an age of unchecked nuclear proliferation and, it seems likely, nuclear terrorism. There is, therefore, no future in which aspiring martyrs will make good neighbors for us. Unless liberals realize that there are tens of millions of people in the Muslim world who are far scarier than Dick Cheney, they will be unable to protect civilization from its genuine enemies.

Here's Harris' brand new paperback, Letter To A Christian Nation, published yesterday. And here's the paperback version of his fantastic book I already have, The End Of Faith.

Posted by aalkon at September 19, 2006 10:34 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.advicegoddess.com/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/1689

Comments

Cheney's still a prick, though... It was the last straw when he shot that fucker.

Favorite part: "Numerous studies have found that the most radicalized Muslims tend to have better-than-average educations and economic opportunities."

I saw this happening in the college town where I grew up in the 70s. Oil-moneyed Arab teens would land on campus wearing the most fashionable clothes money could buy, driving to classes in tiny, powerful sports coupes. They looked like this picture of Osama's family in 1971: http://tinyurl.com/4ex6u

No matter how they tried to fit in, they couldn't get laid or otherwise acclimate to the western mindset, despite having the best imaginable credential$. My sister used to talk about some of the come-on lines she got from these guys while studying at the library. They were inane.

It was happening across the globe. These young men carried these new resentments and humiliations to the only homey shelter they could find in the foreign land, the mosque. That's where the radicalization happened. Before these crises of late adolescence, they may have been religiously moderate or unobservant. So the best-educated ones, the ones returning home to run the family business and fund their generation's "charities," went home angry.

Posted by: Crid at September 19, 2006 7:12 AM

I've long suspected a good bit of this centered around the inability to get pussy.

And believe me, I'm not exactly the charter member of the Dick Cheney fan club.

Posted by: Amy Alkon at September 19, 2006 7:33 AM

Pollyanna Liberalism is just another religion. And like all cults it weaves whatever fairy tales are necessary to gird itself against an ever-threatening reality.

Posted by: Paul Hrissikopoulos at September 19, 2006 7:52 AM

Why does this writer assume that all the people polled who believe conspiracy theories are liberals?

There are plenty of conspiracy theories on the right that involve the federal government orchestrating events in order to give itself more power.

I don't know many of these strawmen liberals who don't believe that terrorists are dangerous. I do know plenty who think that invading Iraq didn't do a damn thing to make the situation better.

Western power is utterly malevolent, while the powerless people of the Earth can be counted on to embrace reason and tolerance, if only given sufficient economic opportunities.

There certainly are those on the left who believe this, but about 95% are on the fringe and have no influence whatsoever -- those people also tend to hate Democrats as much as, if not more than, Republicans.

Genuine liberals reject black-or-white, good-and-evil analogies, because they don't tend to see existence as a grand struggle between eternal forces of light and dark.

Posted by: LYT at September 19, 2006 12:20 PM

> Genuine liberals...

OK, but you have to listen next time someone says something like "Genuine conservatives reject Bush's fiscal policies." There *is* a grand struggle between light and dark... but it's more about modernity and primitivism. Failure to acknowledge this is what makes leftism distasteful. There's a wordsmith-y sort of person out there who thinks the problem is understanding and compassion, as if there are fabulous tools for dialogue that haven't been given a chance. Over the weekend, Ratzinger learned that we're running out of things to talk about.

Posted by: Crid at September 19, 2006 1:55 PM

I do have to agree with Mr. T. that the numbers reported by that poll seem rather high. I don't think anyone I know -- well, with the exception of maybe one person -- believes the U.S. government assisted in the destruction of the World Trade Center. Even Le Monde stomped Thierry Meyssan when he pulled that noxious book out of his ass. Nevertheless, I think a vast majority of Westerners underestimate the fragility of the Shangri-la in which they reside, as well as the possibility that they may live to see the beginning of a high-tech dark age without end.

Posted by: Paul Hrissikopoulos at September 19, 2006 3:47 PM

"... liberals continue to imagine that Muslim terrorism springs from economic despair, lack of education and American militarism."

This liberal thinks that the above are the fuel that turn the "pestilential theology" from a campfire (Fatwah against Rushdie) to a wildfire (Kill the Pope and the rest of us.) But as Harris infers, the cult of death is there from the outset. I think we have to be careful, though, of too easily conflating single issues into one grand generalization .. about liberals, that is. About those who would die for religion and paradise there is no question -- whatever religion they profess. Religion is the root of all evil even though some of the flowers look very pretty in season.

Posted by: david at September 19, 2006 7:45 PM

"...Numerous studies have found that the most radicalized Muslims tend to have better-than-average educations and economic opportunities..."


Call them educated idiots...usually quite intelligent in the context of their professions, but lacking a capacity or willingness to otherwise think rationally.


Posted by: Doobie at September 19, 2006 8:19 PM

> Religion is the root of all evil

It's just not true. Religion and silly obeisance to weird-dressed authority is a problem. But don't kid yourself for a minute: The problem is human nature, and it's not going away just because you snicker at nuns.

Posted by: Crid at September 19, 2006 9:42 PM

"My sister used to talk about some of the come-on lines she got from these guys. They were inane."

Their attempts at pillow talk also leave much to be desired:

"These are marks of stretch, yes?"

Posted by: Lena at September 19, 2006 10:57 PM

Lena, other than the crappy pillow talk, how was he in bed? Let me guess-crappy?

I was also unfortunate enough to experience the come-on techniques and lines, and I just thought they were too funny!

Posted by: Canada at September 20, 2006 8:27 AM

Leave a comment