Turn Your 5-Year-Old Into A Sex Goddess!
Look! It's a 5-year-old tarted up as Holiday Barbie! Here's some vile video from the 2001 documentary Living Dolls: The Making of a Child Beauty Queen. (Some mothers raise children, some seem more interested in raising fame.)
Whored-up screenshots of the poor kid here. Like this one:
What makes me particularly ill is the way they Bette Davis'd up the lips to make a 5-year-old "sexier."
Wow.
She will start drinking at 10. Have a full blown eating disorder at 12 once her body starts to change. She will then have sex with dozens of men before she's 20 in an attempt to gain their approval b/c she never felt truly valued as a person. She will be emotionally dependent on her manipulative, can't-be-pleased c-u-n-t of a mother.
Maybe I'm just being harsh, unfairly judgmental and jumping to all the wrong conclusions about this little girl's life. Maybe she likes it all. Unfortunately, I'm probably not too far off.
Gretchen at December 27, 2007 4:53 AM
P.S: the link of pictures is like the garden of eden for pedos.
Gretchen at December 27, 2007 4:55 AM
Nothing makes me sicker to my stomach than to see this shit. I would NEVER EVER exploit my daughters like this. Gretchen, I think you are right on the money. Anyone who tarts up their 5 year old to look like Bette Davis is one sick moron. 5-year-olds are not supposed to be sexy, they're supposed to be children. Ack.
Flynne at December 27, 2007 5:35 AM
How the hell can anyone think this "cute"? Her parents deaths are probably the best thing that ever happened to this girl -- if they didn't do too much damage beforehand. And that boy at the bottom of the link? All it brings to mind is NAMBLA. Their eyes do say it all. You can see the tears being held back and the fright and bewilderment. This should be considered child abuse. Pageants for kids should just be done away with all together. I think we can live without beautiful baby contests. The price paid for them is too high.
Donna at December 27, 2007 5:51 AM
Let the kids be kids! They'll have plenty of time to dress up like adults when they become adults. Why do you have to be licensed to own a dog but not to have children...10,000 years ago parents like this more than likely would have been killed and eaten by bears. To mothers that do this, GET A JOB; you are causing more damage by "being there" for them then you would be if you worked! Your chief responsibility as a parent is to "keep your daughters off the stripper pole". AAAAHHHHHH! More chlorine in the gene pool!
Blackjack at December 27, 2007 7:03 AM
How can these mothers not see that the point of all this makeup and clothes is to make females sexually attractive to males? This is fine for adult females, but NOT for 5 year olds.
Chrissy at December 27, 2007 7:18 AM
Let me repeat my goal as a parent in this regard: to see that my daughter establishes a relationship she can grow into; to choose a companion who is alike in being funny and smart, and who shares some common interests; who will not become a "servant" or try to turn her into one.
In this, I and my ex have been successful. She's now 25 and nobody can lie to her. She's sharp enough that I have actually seen a server run into a pole in a restaurant as she took her hair down (don't worry - she didn't shake out any fleas). She's making her own way, and I'm continuously delighted at that.
That was the idea since she was very young. She has always been a person, not a thing. Your cutie is adorable enough. Let people see that and marvel at the goddess she can become, not the whore.
Radwaste at December 27, 2007 8:05 AM
As I told some girls in Michigan who struck up a conversation with me, and then revealed that they wanted to enter "America's Top Model": Looks fade. Before long, you're not beautiful and dumb, just dumb. And the most beautiful women I know are yes, people who are physically attractive, but those who also have something to them as far as brains, knowledge, and character go.
Amy Alkon at December 27, 2007 8:07 AM
That picture is just plain disturbing. I lowe little girls at that age. They are just sweet and cuddly and innocent. They are also vulnerable. The picture reminds me of the whole Jon Benet Ramsey murder story. When they played those videos of those little five and six year olds dressed up like playboy models, that was a shock to me, I didn't know they did anything like that. They are children, they should all be allowed to have their childhood.
Bikerken at December 27, 2007 8:22 AM
Pardon me, I meant to say, "love little girls at that age." Typing without glasses again.
Bikerken at December 27, 2007 8:24 AM
Gretchen I agree 100%
It is hard enough to raise a daughter with a positive body image. So not only are they pimping out their children, they are stomping on their self worth. I am pretty confident, but I wouldn't be very comfortable standing up in a room of my peers and getting ranked on my looks, imagine how that must be for a child, when everything seems bigger and more important.
I tell my daughter(s) that the most beautiful woman in the room is the one that is smiling.
dena at December 27, 2007 8:31 AM
I think this is worse than the beauty contest tarted up look. Scroll down for some of the lovely ways you can have your child photoshopped. "Eyes replaced." Who wants a photo of their child with their freaking eyes replaced. How sick and creepy is that? (Quite, in my book). On the bright side, the "Children turning into evil dolls" concept could make for a good/bad low-rent paranoid horror film.
justin case at December 27, 2007 8:57 AM
One of my favourite photos (which I won't post) is my daughter at about that age. Missing front teeth, hair a mess, wearing an anorak over pajamas and bare feet, standing in the garden with absolute joy and delight shining out of her face as she holds a basket of chocolate easter eggs she found after the easter bunny hid them. She looks like a refugee except that everything about her tells you a different story. That's what childhood is about IMO.
Norman at December 27, 2007 8:58 AM
This has alway struck me as the female equivalent of the loser father at the baseball game that constantly yells at his son.
Also, I know this is trivial in the context, but it's one of my pet peeves. The one and only thing that you absolutely, positively must know to use lipstick effectively: color between the lines!!!
Shawn at December 27, 2007 9:02 AM
Kid's going to turn into "Pat" from Saturday Night Live - a flag-waving bull dyke for sure. Such sweet revenge.
Pirate Jo at December 27, 2007 9:02 AM
That retouching is some twisted shit, Justin.
Amy Alkon at December 27, 2007 9:05 AM
Ohhhhhmigawwwd justin!! You win the award for Most Disturbing Link of the Day!
I can just see the ad "for a short time only you'll receive a FREE porcelain doll child to go with your blow up doll wife!"
Gretchen at December 27, 2007 9:18 AM
That retouching is some twisted shit, Justin.
Don't I know it. I have a friend who specializes in sending these sorts of disturbing links with me (the link to the blog post crack-smoking diaper-wearing male prostitute from a while back was one of hers, too).
What is it about the human condition that creates this near-undeniable urge to share awful stuff with one another?
justin case at December 27, 2007 10:21 AM
What in the name of fuck is wrong with these people? Never in my life have I seen a child more in need of a hug and a Mr. Rogers marathon.
How the hell can a person not look at these kids and go 'A sexy four year old, this is actually pretty fucking disturbing.' Did anyone else go 'Ewwwwww' when the egg-donor (I'm not going to call that a 'mom') said 'Even men were recognizing her'?
Elle at December 27, 2007 1:15 PM
Tragic and horrible.
Amy Alkon at December 27, 2007 1:26 PM
She will be emotionally dependent on her manipulative, can't-be-pleased c-u-n-t of a mother.
Maybe their parents will also end up six feet under, just like ol' Patsy. Call it Karma.
Doobie at December 27, 2007 5:11 PM
OMG, Justin! You aren't kidding. The after pics all look literally like dolls, especially that first girls' eyes -- they turned from little girl eyes to literally eyes like you'd see in a baby doll. Why would anyone want that? And what was wrong with that little boy's hair to begin with? I thought it was cute as is. The hair gel touch up was just horrendous.
Donna at December 28, 2007 5:17 AM
This is what happens when parents try to live vicariously through their children. Mommy never got to do beauty pageants so she has the daughter do them. These fucking people need serious help.
vlad at December 28, 2007 7:11 AM
Dolls indeed. You get the feeling that if you picked one of them up, their eyes would open and close with the movement.
miche at December 28, 2007 7:12 AM
If everyone raised well adjusted kids then who would be plying the pole for out viewing pleasure.
vlad at December 28, 2007 7:16 AM
At 15, my daughter asked to be in a pageant. I let her, but told her I wasn't big into pageants and explained why. My beautiful daughter lost miserably, and afterwards, she started in with all this insecure (I'm soooo fat, etc.) mumbojumbo. I purposely bought the video of it ($65) just so I could point out a few disturbing things about the pageant I found wholly revolting. Three weeks later when the video arrived in the mail, we sat down and watched it. The three contestants who won the bathing suit division looked like holocaust victims, the one that won the Miss Congeniality division was the one with the most pathetic "talent" routine, and the one who got top prize was the sister of the top prize winner from the year before. Of course, I can't forget to mention the prize for the contestant whose family and friends put the most money in her popularity jar. Now, that prize has to make you feel special! Anyway, we were able to laugh a little and have some pretty deep talk about real beauty and from where self-worth truly comes. She soon quit with the bullshit mumbojumbo too. Needless to say, we don't do pageants anymore, but on a real superficial level (ha), what a waste of cash!
kg at December 28, 2007 9:34 AM
It's important that we confine this trend, even as we punish it with our other social mechanisms. See #2.
Crid at December 29, 2007 7:49 PM
Oh. My.
Amy Alkon at December 29, 2007 9:06 PM
5-year olds aren't supposed to be sexy. Gee, I wonder when people on these blogs will just give up being unkind and saying snarky stuff? I guess when they are ready for miracles, and increased money, love, health, more friends, not to mention a wonderful sex life. Why not show off the God withi you? Was Jesus ever this snarky? Sheesh.
That said, yes it is sick 'n' twisted when people pull a "Jon Benet Ramsey".
Linda at January 7, 2008 5:58 PM
Uh, Linda, what are you saying, exactly?
Amy Alkon at January 7, 2008 6:24 PM
If parents are willing to dress their kids up as adult whores then those kids should be used as whores....violated....filled with cum...anal raped...everyting. and if the parent complains, tough.
Mr Nasty at September 5, 2009 2:26 AM
"P.S: the link of pictures is like the garden of eden for pedos."
No it's not. From what I know, pedos are attracted to children for their natural looks, not when they're faces have been massacred to look like 40 year old midgets of alien origin.
Seriously, the people behind these fucked up pageants are not pedos, they're people with an incredibly fucked up perception of what beauty is.
Valkyn at July 6, 2011 3:22 PM
Leave a comment