Islam: A Synopsis
I got this e-mail from a reader -- a brief explanation of Islam for the uninitiated:
Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components.The religious component is a beard for all the other components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called 'religious rights.'
When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to 'the reasonable' Muslim demands for their 'religious rights,' they also get the other components under the table. Here's how it works (percentages source, CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:
United States -- Muslim 1.0%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1%-2%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. (United States).
France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris -- car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam -- Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:
Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 99.9%
Of course, that's not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism & Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.
This is why I say deport them, people who put their faith before their comunity will never be loyal to anyone but those they consider pious enough.
You see this on a smaller scale in christian communities with the persecution of so called sinners - the abandonment of pregnant teenagers, and the out right harassment of anyone who assosiates with anything 'evil' like abortions or porn.
Islam is christianity on crack and speed with a dollop of sexual repression and a dash of homocidal rage
lujlp at October 1, 2008 9:27 AM
It's not so simple. How do we retain who we are (constitutionally, for example) and do that?
Amy Alkon at October 1, 2008 10:04 AM
I don't think you can really deport someone simply for being Muslim in any democratic country. The US and other western countries, however, can decide who they let in. I am not saying to stop immigration but to screen immigrants based on ideology. If you want Sharia and would vote for a party that would turn all non-muslims into second class citizens then sorry "you are not allowed into my country". I honestly do not believe this would come into conflict with liberal values.
Charles at October 1, 2008 1:14 PM
It's a nice way to rationalize killing 100,000 Iraqis. I feel so much better.
Laser Plumb Bob at October 1, 2008 1:33 PM
To lujlp:
When a bunch of bearded Amish men in black start shouting and getting excited, you know there's going to be a barn-raising.
When a bunch of bearded Muslim men in black start shouting and getting excited, you know there's going to be a suicide bombing.
Jesus said "Let he among you who is without sin cast the first stone at her"
Mohammed said "Go in the morning to the wife of this man and stone her to death"
Jesus was profoundly different in nature, not just in degree, from Mohammed.
To Amy:
The Founding Fathers and early generations of Americans were quite sure of who they where, constitutionally & otherwise, and that didn't stop them from recognizing the true nature of Islam. Here's John Quincy Adams in 1829:
"He [Mahomet] declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind...The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Mahomet is the prophet of God...The faithful followers of the prophet may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud or by force...As the essential principle of his faith is the subjugation of others by the sword; it is only by force, that his false doctrines can be dispelled, and his power annihilated."
It's very hard to imagine a 21st century President writing or saying this, instead of gibbering about the "Religion of Peace", and that's the problem.
Martin Beranek at October 1, 2008 1:35 PM
Wow, Not saying that I know the accuracy of the numbers, or the consequences of those numbers, (they look intuitively about correct though) but the post is very interesting.
What was the name of the guy who used to post here that seemed like an expert on Islam? Joe? I'd like to hear some educated rebuttals.
Eric at October 1, 2008 2:21 PM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2008/10/01/islam_a_synopsi.html#comment-1594487">comment from EricJoe. Wish he'd come back.
Amy Alkon at October 1, 2008 2:26 PM
I respected what he wrote. Come back Joe!
Eric at October 1, 2008 2:36 PM
Keeping who we are is easy. We are a nation founded by christians. Are we willing to let nonchristians live here? Yes, we give them constitutional protection. That doesn't mean we have to accept everyone. If a religion (way of life, really) threatens the existence of the US, we are quite within our rights to keep them out, or make them leave. Just like we don't allow satanists who think they need to kill people as sacrifices for their religion, to practice their religion. Freedom of religion only covers you to the point you don't intrude on someone else's rights. Which is why, much as some people like to bleat about it, creationism will never be taught in public schools, no matter how much some christians may want it.
momof3 at October 1, 2008 2:38 PM
Which Christians are you speaking of momof3? Jefferson? Washington? Madison?
Here's some context for you:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/john_murphy/jamesmadison.html
How'd you feel about rounding up the Japanese about 60 years ago?
Eric at October 1, 2008 2:47 PM
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door."
Current context: all those who would flee from the tyranny offered by Islam. Not the Islamofascists themselves....
juliana at October 1, 2008 2:53 PM
This is an interesting post. I had assumed that the muslim population in France, Germany, and the Netherlands was much higher, simply because they are always in the news in those countries.
Charles,
There has been a bit of a push to keep those who would enforce sharia law in the US from coming here. HR 6975 was introduced by Rep. Tancredo in September, but I've only seen one article (link below) mentioning it. I would be all for a law like this, but I don't know if it would pass through a Democrat-majority Congress.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76026
(I found this link on the ifeminists site last week, which Amy has a link to.)
ahw at October 1, 2008 2:54 PM
It's not so simple. How do we retain who we are (constitutionally, for example) and do that?
When a mulsim kills someone over religious doctrine don't imprison them deport them to their country of origin.
If some guy kills his daughter, and no one in the family tried to stop it deport them all.
Charge every simple one of them with depraved indifference homocide, and create a law that allows us to deport anyone who uses their religion as an excuse for murder
Change the process for gaining citizenship - make the waiting period longer.
lujlp at October 1, 2008 6:33 PM
Good research job. Much of what you put in your work agrees with some of what I believed, but had no hard evidence. Thanks.
joe six-pack at October 1, 2008 6:56 PM
The japanese in America weren't automatically imperialists. The Islams in America are Islamic. If they follow their religion, they have to be our enemies. It's built into the very fabric and laws of their beliefs. And there is no Constitutional requirement that we let our enemies in, or allow them to stay here.
In God We Trust. Not in Allah, not in Brahman, or buddha, or humanity do we trust.
momof3 at October 2, 2008 5:44 AM
All those Swedes and Swiss can only wish they lived in the conflict-free paradise that is China.
D. Aristophanes at October 2, 2008 6:49 AM
Not all is lost:
The OIC does not speak for Muslims
http://www.iheu.org/node/3277
The Mad Hungarian at October 2, 2008 8:45 AM
We need somebody like the Australian Prime Minister here. Got an email about him awhile back, and checked him out on Snopes.com. Here's what I found: http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/australia.asp
Sandy at October 3, 2008 11:15 AM
Wow, Sandy, cool. I especially like the way he didn't let them PC him into a corner.
T's Grammy at October 8, 2008 9:21 AM
Leave a comment