Quantum Of Ethics
Hans A. von Spakovsky writes in The Weekly Standard that Secretary of Labor nom Hilda Solis' breach of House ethics rules may disqualify her from serving:
A seemingly innocuous letter sent to the Clerk of the House of Representatives last Thursday by President Obama's Secretary of Labor nominee Hilda Solis raises serious and troubling legal questions about her nomination and apparent violation of House ethics rules. Not only was she involved with a private organization that was lobbying her fellow legislators on a bill that she has cosponsored, but she apparently kept her involvement secret and failed to reveal a clear conflict of interest.Solis was a co-sponsor in 2007 of the so-called "Employee Free Choice Act," the card check legislation that would effectively eliminate the secret ballot and destroy the ability of employees to make an anonymous decision (without fear of retribution) on whether they want to join a union. She was also a co-sponsor of the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act, legislation that would force states to allow public safety officers to form unions. At the same time, however, Solis was a board member of a pro-union organization, American Rights at Work, that has been lobbying Congress on both of these bills.
According to a letter filed by Solis with the House Clerk on January 29, 2009, she was not just a director of the ARW, along with fellow travelers like David Bonior, Julian Bond, and John Sweeney, she was actually the treasurer. In other words, she is the official legally charged with the fiduciary duty of approving and signing off on all spending by the organization. And to make matters worse, she did not reveal to her colleagues in the House of Representatives that membership on her financial disclosure forms, which may constitute a separate ethical violation.
Card check legislation has been ignored by just about everybody but Kaus, and it's something that needs to be disputed and quashed.
And here's one more sign that Obama's a politician, not the next Jesus, from CNN:
President Barack Obama on Tuesday admitted he made a mistake in handling the nomination of Tom Daschle as his health and human services secretary, saying Daschle's tax problems sent a message that the politically powerful are treated differently from average people.Daschle, the former Democratic leader in the U.S. Senate, withdrew earlier Tuesday as news that he failed to pay some taxes in the past continued to stir opposition on Capitol Hill.
"I think I screwed up," Obama said in a wide-ranging interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper.
"And I take responsibility for it and we're going to make sure we fix it so it doesn't happen again."
But, will Obama allow his auntie to be deported?
A national group is calling on President Barack Obama to deport his aunt, an illegal immigrant who was living in Boston.The Americans for Legal Immigration PAC filed an arrest request with Immigration and Customs Enforcement Monday and issued a public demand for Obama to deport Zeituni Onyango.
...Onyango is currently living in Ohio and has vowed to fight against being deported. Four years ago, an immigration judge instructed her to leave the country after her request for asylum from her native Kenya was rejected.
"President Obama has promised the American public that his administration will honor the principles of open government, the Constitution and the Rule of Law," said William Gheen of ALIPAC. "Obama must either deport his aunt or destroy his own credibility by showing her favoritism."
auntie link via Drudge







the catch with anybody administrations want to hire is finding the person that hasn't done anything wrong. Our entire political class has a problem with this, regardless if it's yelling 'do you know who I am?' at a traffic cop or knowing what you can get away with, taxwise. They excell in 'working the system', indeed that is how they got into it. I think these schmoes should have to take all the standard compliance, and ethics classes that the government forces it's contractors to take. that way they would have to sign on the bottom line that says 'yes I took this course and pledge to follow all ethical rules stated in this handbook...'
Then tommy-boy wouldn't be able to say that he didn't know that the gift of a car and driver would be considered income. Nor would he be able to flop about about it being a conflict of interest for him to accept that.
hey, look over there! Shiny! Don't look behind the curtain!
SwissArmyD at February 4, 2009 9:32 AM
Hilda Solis must be either totally corrupt or totally clueless. Either way, we don't need her.
I can't say that I admire or like the man, but at least Obama is willing to admit mistakes. It gives me a slim hope that we aren't so totally fucked, as Brian likes to say.
William (wbhicks@hotmail.com) at February 4, 2009 10:27 AM
but at least Obama is willing to admit mistakes
It's no big deal when it's already been exposed. That's just damage control.
kishke at February 4, 2009 10:53 AM
It's a strategy, perhaps, appearing open and accepting of culpability.
Amy Alkon at February 4, 2009 12:48 PM
Exactly. He says he accepts "responsibility." It's a meaningless statement. What does such acceptance entail? What results from it? Nothing.
kishke at February 4, 2009 1:17 PM
It's a strategy, perhaps, appearing open and accepting of culpability.
Be that as it may, how many more times will Obama use the "open and accepting of culpability" strategy? How many "mistakes" has he made that we don't know about yet? How many will see the light of day? How many won't? I think THAT, boys and girls, is the million dollar question. o.O
Flynne at February 4, 2009 1:20 PM
William -
Within the next six months, you will hear at least one major liberal pundit say "I really miss George Bush's competence".
My observation stands.
We are so fucked.
brian at February 4, 2009 2:42 PM
Brian, I wasn't really doubting your observation. Notice that I stated 'slim hope', which is exactly how I feel.
Sure, he's doing damage control, but did Bush ever admit to screwing up? Ever?
William (wbhicks@hotmail.com) at February 4, 2009 8:07 PM
That just means that Bush wasn't as good at damage control.
kishke at February 4, 2009 8:30 PM
I don't think it was just that Bush wasn't as good at damage control - I think that Bush really didn't think he had screwed up. Obama may be doing damage control, but if he realizes that he screwed up, then he's may actually change his thoughts and actions. If you don't think you're wrong, you have no reason to change. This doesn't mean that it's likely that Obama will change his spots, but it does mean there's a slim possibility.
William (wbhicks@hotmail.com) at February 5, 2009 10:09 AM
William -
You want to know why Bush never said "I screwed up"?
Because the moment it came out of his mouth, the media would have pounced on him with a fury that makes the stained blue dress look like an op-ed in the Buttpoke, TN Gazette.
Obama knows that the media will NEVER say anything disparaging about him, so he's free to say "I screwed up" as a way of deflecting.
And it worked on you. Instead of saying "My God, what an incompetent ass!", you're saying "Hey, at least he admitted it!"
14 days in, and it's already a failed presidency.
brian at February 5, 2009 2:57 PM
Leave a comment