What Geert Would've Said
Had Geert Wilders been allowed into the U.K. to speak to Parliament -- instead of being stopped at Heathrow because he speaks the truth about the violent totalitarian system that is Islam -- here's an excerpt of what they would've heard:

Today, I come before you to warn of another great threat. It is called Islam. It poses as a religion, but its goals are very worldly: world domination, holy war, sharia law, the end of the separation of church and state, the end of democracy. It is not a religion, it is a political ideology. It demands your respect, but has no respect for you.

There might be moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. Islam will never change, because it is built on two rocks that are forever, two fundamental beliefs that will never change, and will never go away. First, there is Quran, Allah's personal word, uncreated, forever, with orders that need to be fulfilled regardless of place or time. And second, there is al-insal al-kamil, the perfect man, Muhammad the role model, whose deeds are to be imitated by all Muslims. And since Muhammad was a warlord and a conqueror we know what to expect.

Islam means submission, so there cannot be any mistake about it's goal. That's a given. The question is whether the British people, with its glorious past, is longing for that submission.

We see Islam taking off in the West at an incredible speed. The United Kingdom has seen a rapid growth of the number of Muslims. Over the last ten years, the Muslim population has grown ten times as fast as the rest of society. This has put an enormous pressure on society. Thanks to British politicians who have forgotten about Winston Churchill, the English now have taken the path of least resistance. They give up. They give in.

Thank you very much for letting me into the country. I received a letter from the Secretary of State for the Home Department, kindly disinviting me. I would threaten community relations, and therefore public security in the UK, the letter stated.

For a moment I feared that I would be refused entrance. But I was confident the British government would never sacrifice free speech because of fear of Islam. Britannia rules the waves, and Islam will never rule Britain, so I was confident the Border Agency would let me through. And after all, you have invited stranger creatures than me. Two years ago the House of Commons welcomed Mahmoud Suliman Ahmed Abu Rideh, linked to Al Qaeda. He was invited to Westminster by Lord Ahmed, who met him at Regent's Park mosque three weeks before. Mr. Rideh, suspected of being a money man for terror groups, was given a SECURITY sticker for his Parliamentary visit.

Well, if you let in this man, than an elected politician from a fellow EU country surely is welcome here too. By letting me speak today you show that Mr Churchill's spirit is still very much alive. And you prove that the European Union truly is working; the free movement of persons is still one of the pillars of the European project.

But there is still much work to be done. Britain seems to have become a country ruled by fear. A country where civil servants cancel Christmas celebrations to please Muslims. A country where Sharia Courts are part of the legal system. A country where Islamic organizations asked to stop the commemoration of the Holocaust. A country where a primary school cancels a Christmas nativity play because it interfered with an Islamic festival. A country where a school removes the words Christmas and Easter from their calendar so as not to offend Muslims. A country where a teacher punishes two students for refusing to pray to Allah as part of their religious education class. A country where elected members of a town council are told not to eat during daylight hours in town hall meetings during the Ramadan. A country that excels in its hatred of Israel, still the only democracy in the Middle-East. A country whose capitol is becoming 'Londonistan.'

I would not qualify myself as a free man. Four and a half years ago I lost my freedom. I am under guard permanently, courtesy to those who prefer violence to debate. But for the leftist fan club of Islam, that is not enough. They started a legal procedure against me. Three weeks ago the Amsterdam Court of Appeals ordered my criminal prosecution for making Fitna and for my views on Islam. I committed what George Orwell called a 'thought crime.'

You might have seen my name on Fitna's credit role, but I am not really responsible for that movie. It was made for me. It was actually produced by Muslim extremists, the Quran and Islam itself. If Fitna is considered 'hate speech,' then how would the Court qualify the Quran, with all its calls for violence, and hatred against women and Jews?

Mr. Churchill himself compared the Quran to Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf. Well, I did exactly the same, and that is what they are prosecuting me for.

I wonder if the UK ever put Mr. Churchill on trail.

The Court's decision and the letter I received form the Secretary of State for the Home Department are two major victories for all those who detest freedom of speech. They are doing Islam's dirty work. Sharia by proxy. The differences between Saudi Arabia and Jordan on one hand, and Holland and Britain are blurring. Europe is now on the fast track of becoming Eurabia. That is apparently the price we have to pay for the project of mass immigration, and the multicultural project.

Ladies and gentlemen, the dearest of our many freedoms is under attack. In Europe, freedom of speech is no longer a given. What we once considered a natural component of our existence is now something we again have to fight for. That is what is at stake. Whether or not I end up in jail is not the most pressing issue. The question is: Will free speech be put behind bars?

We have to defend freedom of speech.

For the generation of my parents the word 'London' is synonymous with hope and freedom. When my country was occupied by the national-socialists the BBC offered a daily glimpse of hope, in the darkness of Nazi tyranny. Millions of my country men listened to it, illegally. The words 'This Is London' were a symbol for a better world coming soon. If only the British and Canadian and American soldiers were here.

What will be transmitted forty years from now? Will it still be 'This Is London'? Or will it be 'this is Londonistan'? Will it bring us hope, or will it signal the values of Mecca and Medina? Will Britain offer submission or perseverance? Freedom or slavery?

The choice is ours.

Ladies and gentlemen,

We will never apologize for being free. We will never give in. We will never surrender.

Freedom must prevail, and freedom will prevail.

Thank you very much.

Geert Wilders MP
Chairman, Party for Freedom (PVV)
The Netherlands

The human capacity to deny the undeniable is unlimited. ~beats me

We will see how Europe ends up in our lifetime.

~I hate conservatives...but I really hate fucking liberals~Trey Parker & Matt Stone (creators of South Park)

Robert at February 17, 2009 2:00 AM

RIP, Britannia.

Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg at February 17, 2009 5:38 AM

"When my country was occupied by the national-socialists the BBC offered a daily glimpse of hope, in the darkness of Nazi tyranny." Um not to point fingers but England was never occupied by the Germans in WWII. Operation sea lion was postponed indefinitely in 1940.

"There might be moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam." That is just a flagrantly stupid statement. Moderate Muslims are by definition practicing moderate Islam.

While what she encountered scares the shit out of me it also scares the shit out of most Muslims. I think we should watch and wait. When one of these shit nut pig fucker crosses the line we bury the fuckers alive in a pig skin, with a used dildo (supplied by the gay porn industry) up his ass. Otherwise leave the peaceful one alone lest we confirm the fuck nuts stance.

vlad at February 17, 2009 8:05 AM

"Um not to point fingers but England was never occupied by the Germans in WWII. Operation sea lion was postponed indefinitely in 1940."

True, but the Netherlands did fall to the Nazis in 1940. A small, flat country, it didn't take Germany long to roll over it. BBC did broadcast into Nazi-occupied Europe during the war; that's probably what Mr. Wilders is referring to.

old rpm daddy at February 17, 2009 8:16 AM

Amy Alkon

http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/02/17/what_geert_woul.html#comment-1634396">comment from vlad

Moderate Muslims are by definition practicing moderate Islam.

I've seen projections that 80 percent of Muslims are illiterate. Also, Islam is not moderate -- it commands Muslims to convert or kill the infidel and install The New Caliphate. Many Muslims just haven't actually read the Quran. "Moderate Muslims" aren't actually practicing actual Islam.

Amy Alkon at February 17, 2009 8:18 AM

Amy Alkon

http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/02/17/what_geert_woul.html#comment-1634397">comment from Amy Alkon

Here, take it from an Egyptian Christian:

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/89076

I lived around 35 years in different muslim countries and all my life among muslims, and I am telling you from my personal experience that there are no such thing called moderate muslims.

The Quran - muslims holy book - says that the world is dividend into 2 parts:

1) a land of islam, where islam manage the people life and force non-muslims to convert or top leave, and

2) a land of war, where these countries should be invaded to force it to accept islam.

Someone will ask me, why this was not on action before. It is simple.

Muslims for the first time from many centuries have a lot of money and power:

- there are independent states in the Arab World and Asia,

- oil prices have been rocketing up high since 1973,

- more muslims are getting education and can travel.

What we might consider as moderate muslims are considered traitors and non-muslims (atheists or whatever) but the fidel muslims.

Muslims according to their book have to treat badly the non-muslims (push them) either morally or physically till they convert to islam.

A clear example from 1400 years (imagine from 1400 years islam did not change):

- Egypt was a 100% christian state and was invaded by the Arab Muslims around year 700 ac.

- After invading Egypt, they obliged all christians to pay double taxes (this is our history). If you as christian could not pay the double taxes, you have one of 2 choices :

1) to convert to islam, so you can pay normal taxes.

2) to be killed by the sword in public.

So you do not really have many choices.

After decades of torture and abuse of christians in Egypt, Christians now represent only around 10% of the country, ie between 7-10 million residents.

Amy Alkon at February 17, 2009 8:23 AM

Amy Alkon

http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/02/17/what_geert_woul.html#comment-1634399">comment from Amy Alkon

Here's another:

http://www.amilimani.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=73&Itemid=2

There is no such thing as moderate Islam. There is no such thing as secular Islam or a secular Muslim. How can you possibly secularize a shark or a snake? You can’t. It’s the nature of the beast. There are numerous sects within Islam. One and all are extremes and not in the least amenable to change. Keep in mind that Islam claims that it is the perfect eternal faith for mankind. Splits have occurred and will continue to occur in Islam. Yet, reformation has not happened in nearly 1400 years and is not going to happen. Islam is carved in granite, just the way it is. No change. Allah's book is sealed.

There are indeed some Muslims who are moderate in the way they practice their religion. These people, for the most part, are culturally Muslims. They don't practice Islam the way it is mandated. They pick and choose. Therefore, "moderate Islam," is no Islam at all. It is not possible. The only way to deal with the menace of real Islam, the Islamofascist varieties, is to fully dismantle it and relegate it to the confines of museums.

The Islamists have created fear not only in a non-Islamic world, but in the hearts and minds of those who consider themselves to be Muslims. The Islamists wage their war under the name of Islam. They receive immense direct and indirect support from the rank-and-file of ordinary Muslims. It is this support of moderate Muslims that keeps the Islamists alive. And it is the Islamists who are intent on showing no mercy to any and all who do not share their ideology, be they Muslims or not.

This is why there is truly no such thing as a “moderate” Muslim. Moderate Muslims, or in other words “non-practicing Muslims”, are moderate by default only. Like millions of Iranians who were born into a faith they did not choose, a faith that was “inflicted” upon them by invaders of a foreign culture, a faith that forbids them to leave or revert to their pre-Islamic heritage and other Iranian religions, they remain Muslims in name only.

Amy Alkon at February 17, 2009 8:28 AM

Um not to point fingers but England was never occupied by the Germans in WWII.

He's from Holland, which was occupied.

kishke at February 17, 2009 9:06 AM

"There are indeed some Muslims who are moderate in the way they practice their religion. These people, for the most part, are culturally Muslims." You choice of quotes not mine.

"And it is the Islamists who are intent on showing no mercy to any and all who do not share their ideology, be they Muslims or not." These would be the ones I was referring to. Even this author makes a distinction between Muslims and Islamists.

"they remain Muslims in name only." But the are still Muslims as far as the rest of the world is concerned. Yet few recognize the distinction between these people and the nutters why?

"He's from Holland, which was occupied." Sorry missed that.

vlad at February 17, 2009 10:17 AM

Vlad,

The jihadists are considered to be the ones that want to bring Islam to the world through violent means. What what about those moderates that would want to bring Islam to the world through non-violent means? Are they moderate? In my country (Canada), these moderates almost legalized Sharia law in our largest province. I also would challenge you to find one moderate Muslim who will vocally oppose the idea of the Jizya or Dhimmis (which are obvious violations of basic human rights) ... I haven't so far. The unfortunate fact is that to be a moderate Muslim (and accept western society) you have to reject most of the Qur'an. Moderate Muslims are Muslims in name only ... kinda like saying I'm a Catholic. I'm not saying they don't exist, they do, but I don't think they are the majority.

Charles at February 17, 2009 10:54 AM

"but I don't think they are the majority." I'm not sure one way or the other but to discount them as non-existent is just plain wrong.

vlad at February 17, 2009 11:14 AM

Vlad, they discount themselves by staying silent when extremists commit atrocities. If you're silent and invisible, you have no right to expect to be counted.

momof3 at February 17, 2009 11:25 AM

"they discount themselves by staying silent when extremists commit atrocities."
Yes the do just run a Google search "moderate Muslims speak out" You get a shit load of hits. SO the do and are still doing it.

BTW when was the last time you nasty grammed the indigent psycho Shirley Phelps-Roper?

vlad at February 17, 2009 11:36 AM

"Our national virtue is our national weakness. We do not want to change all that much, and as long as our world-famed good nature does no great harm, why should we? Klopstock gave us some good advice, however: Don't be too good natured, since our enemies are not noble enough to overlook our mistakes.

If this advice applies anywhere, it apples to our relations with the [....]. Carelessness here is not only a weakness, it is disregard of duty and a crime against the security of the state. The [.....] long for one thing: to reward our foolishness with bloodshed and terror. It must never come to that. One of the most effective defenses is an unforgiving, cold hardness against the destroyers of our people, against the instigators of the war, against those who would benefit if we lose, and therefore also against the victims, if we win."

Im back (but only briefly). The above is propaganda. Its meant to rile, validate opinions, cement schemata, blah, blah, blah.

This above was written on November 16, 1941 by Joseph Goebbels - propaganda minister and devout follower of Adolf Hitler. Just insert the word "Jew" in every [....] or "Muslim", whatever.

[Die Juden sind schuld!" Das eherne Herz (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, 1943), pp. 85-91.]

tootsy at February 17, 2009 5:06 PM

Leave a comment

Name

Email Address

URL

Remember personal info?

Comments (You may use HTML tags for style)

People drive to work in cars or pirates? (required):