On the contrary, go to France, directly to Paris, no luggage, just get off the plane and get on the RER B (train from Charles de Gaulle) and get off at the Luxembourg stop (by le Jardin du Luxembourg).
Ask somebody to point you toward rue St. Sulpice (you'll pass the church, L'eglise St. Sulpice, seen in that dumbass movie...you know, with Audrey Tautou and Tom Hanks...really famous novel about the Knights Templar...forget the name)...then ask the way to rue de Rennes.
It's about an eighth of mile. At the corner of rue St. Sulpice and rue de Rennes is the cafe Au Vieux Colombier:
Go there. Order dessert: Moelleux cake. It's a simple cafe, but the best moelleux I've had in Paris or anywhere: a mini hockey puck-sized chocolate cake with runny Valrhona chocolate in it.
I'd feel hard done by with that as dessert. The plate is so big that about half of the food will end up spread so thinly you can't scoop it up. I think nouveau cuisine is a scam: tiny portions, huge plates, artwork, hefty bills.
Norman
at March 16, 2009 4:52 AM
To my Philistine eyes, it looked like an egg yolk.
old rpm daddy
at March 16, 2009 8:58 AM
I'd be ANGRY to find out that that is my dessert. Reminds me of dining at the Neiman-Marcus rotunda (a friend of mine likes to drag me there around Christmas).
Jennifer
at March 16, 2009 4:49 PM
The Friendly's restaurant chain used to have what they called a Reese's Pieces sundae. Four scoops of ice cream (your choice of flavor), hot fudge, marshmallow sauce, peanut butter goo, whipped cream, and topped with Reese's Pieces candy. THAT was a dessert -- about a million calories, and enough sugar to keep your pancreas occupied for a week. When I was much, much younger, I could handle it with ease. I don't know if the restaurant still carries it.
old rpm daddy
at March 16, 2009 5:28 PM
I suppose the logical end of nouveau cuisine is food whose beauty you just admire without actually eating. Poor people could make do with pictures of food. Saves washing up, too.
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/03/15/just_another_or_1.html#comment-1638738">comment from Norman
I don't want a huge piece of dessert. I sometimes get a chocolate chip/chocolate frosted brownie at the cafe where I write. It takes me four days to eat it, usually -- the brownie other people eat in one sitting. Other people who are rather fat, I should say.
Going to France taught me how to eat -- to have small portions of excellent food with plenty of fat in it. I can also make a steak dinner last two or three meals (from an American restaurant, since portions are often huge).
I don't object to small portions as such. It's the pretentiousness of nouveau cuisine that I can't stomach. The dessert in the picture should be served on a spoon.
Norman
at March 17, 2009 8:21 AM
On a different note, that cameraphone takes better pics than my point-and-shoot. Or maybe I should say that that photographer takes better pics than I do.
MonicaP
at March 17, 2009 2:04 PM
Monica's right... Even the BAD effects from the camera look good. I was so impressed by the blue vignette that I downloaded the pic into Photoshop to try to 'correct' it, but it's too subtle, and makes the "yolk" of the sorbet seem that much more alluring.
Crid [cridcridatgmail]
at March 17, 2009 3:53 PM
Actually, I was being sarcastic when I suggested people just look at pictures of food.
Norman
at March 18, 2009 1:04 AM
I thought it was an egg yolk. Looks tiny. I generally eat a *lot* though.
That's a lot of plate for so little sorbet. It is sorbet, isn't it?
kishke at March 15, 2009 11:09 AM
Lemon, I think. And I think it's pretty elegant.
Also, don't assume American portion sizes should be the standard. For me, this is the perfect size of dessert.
Amy Alkon at March 15, 2009 12:51 PM
Looks yummy and that is the perfect size.
Truth at March 15, 2009 1:32 PM
remind me to never go to france.
http://www.slashfood.com/media/2006/07/chocolatelayers.jpg
mlah at March 15, 2009 1:33 PM
On the contrary, go to France, directly to Paris, no luggage, just get off the plane and get on the RER B (train from Charles de Gaulle) and get off at the Luxembourg stop (by le Jardin du Luxembourg).
Ask somebody to point you toward rue St. Sulpice (you'll pass the church, L'eglise St. Sulpice, seen in that dumbass movie...you know, with Audrey Tautou and Tom Hanks...really famous novel about the Knights Templar...forget the name)...then ask the way to rue de Rennes.
It's about an eighth of mile. At the corner of rue St. Sulpice and rue de Rennes is the cafe Au Vieux Colombier:
http://www.fra.cityvox.fr/bars-et-boites_paris/au-vieux-colombier_7865/PhotosLieu
Go there. Order dessert: Moelleux cake. It's a simple cafe, but the best moelleux I've had in Paris or anywhere: a mini hockey puck-sized chocolate cake with runny Valrhona chocolate in it.
THAT is chocolate.
Amy Alkon at March 15, 2009 1:42 PM
I agree, it is elegant. But I would still prefer a larger, still-elegant, scoop of ice.
kishke at March 15, 2009 1:47 PM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/03/15/just_another_or_1.html#comment-1638549">comment from kishkeActually, I think Emily might've said it's lemon tart. Have to find her e-mail.
Amy Alkon
at March 15, 2009 1:53 PM
I'd feel hard done by with that as dessert. The plate is so big that about half of the food will end up spread so thinly you can't scoop it up. I think nouveau cuisine is a scam: tiny portions, huge plates, artwork, hefty bills.
Norman at March 16, 2009 4:52 AM
To my Philistine eyes, it looked like an egg yolk.
old rpm daddy at March 16, 2009 8:58 AM
I'd be ANGRY to find out that that is my dessert. Reminds me of dining at the Neiman-Marcus rotunda (a friend of mine likes to drag me there around Christmas).
Jennifer at March 16, 2009 4:49 PM
The Friendly's restaurant chain used to have what they called a Reese's Pieces sundae. Four scoops of ice cream (your choice of flavor), hot fudge, marshmallow sauce, peanut butter goo, whipped cream, and topped with Reese's Pieces candy. THAT was a dessert -- about a million calories, and enough sugar to keep your pancreas occupied for a week. When I was much, much younger, I could handle it with ease. I don't know if the restaurant still carries it.
old rpm daddy at March 16, 2009 5:28 PM
I suppose the logical end of nouveau cuisine is food whose beauty you just admire without actually eating. Poor people could make do with pictures of food. Saves washing up, too.
Norman at March 17, 2009 2:22 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/03/15/just_another_or_1.html#comment-1638738">comment from NormanI don't want a huge piece of dessert. I sometimes get a chocolate chip/chocolate frosted brownie at the cafe where I write. It takes me four days to eat it, usually -- the brownie other people eat in one sitting. Other people who are rather fat, I should say.
Going to France taught me how to eat -- to have small portions of excellent food with plenty of fat in it. I can also make a steak dinner last two or three meals (from an American restaurant, since portions are often huge).
Amy Alkon
at March 17, 2009 6:41 AM
I don't object to small portions as such. It's the pretentiousness of nouveau cuisine that I can't stomach. The dessert in the picture should be served on a spoon.
Norman at March 17, 2009 8:21 AM
On a different note, that cameraphone takes better pics than my point-and-shoot. Or maybe I should say that that photographer takes better pics than I do.
MonicaP at March 17, 2009 2:04 PM
Monica's right... Even the BAD effects from the camera look good. I was so impressed by the blue vignette that I downloaded the pic into Photoshop to try to 'correct' it, but it's too subtle, and makes the "yolk" of the sorbet seem that much more alluring.
Crid [cridcridatgmail] at March 17, 2009 3:53 PM
Actually, I was being sarcastic when I suggested people just look at pictures of food.
Norman at March 18, 2009 1:04 AM
I thought it was an egg yolk. Looks tiny. I generally eat a *lot* though.
DavidJ at March 23, 2009 10:46 AM
Leave a comment