Verizon Wireless And Heartless?
Verizon refused to help an Ohio sheriff's department triangulate a missing man's cell phone until Sheriff Dale Williiams paid his overdue $20 phone bill. Nancy Schaar writes for the Times-Reporter:
After some disagreement, Williams agreed to pay $20 on the phone bill in order to find the man. But deputies discovered the man just as Williams was preparing to make arrangements for the payment.The sheriff organized the search party for the man after deputies responded to the domestic call Wednesday at 2:21 p.m. at the Kensington Rd. residence. The sheriff said the caller said the man was destroying the house and breaking windows and other items.
But when deputies arrived they were told the man had fled and had taken several bottles of pills.
"I was more concerned for the person's life," Williams said. "It would have been nice if Verizon would have turned on his phone for five or 10 minutes, just long enough to try and find the guy. But they would only turn it on if we agreed to pay $20 of the unpaid bill. Ridiculous."
Williams said he doesn't know how close the situation was to becoming a tragedy because he's not a doctor, but he thinks the man's condition was very serious.
Maybe it's tacit company policy, maybe it's just one dumb, heartless bitch or bastard working for Verizon, who knows. The reporter doesn't seem to have called Verizon to find out. Why the sheriff didn't ask for a supervisor and the supervisor's supervisor, if need be, is another mystery. Maybe this reporter should have gone to curiosity school (I'm not for journalism school, and you might've known that, had the L.A. Times not cut the attribution out of my thoughts they printed on Sunday, making them look as if they came from the reporter who asked me for them.)
via ObscureStore







"maybe it's just one dumb, heartless bitch or bastard working for Verizon..."
I think you're on to something.
ahw at May 22, 2009 9:52 AM
I agree with AHW. It sounds like the "customer service" rep was somebody with a checklist who never bothered to think about what he or she was doing and why it might be important.
I can't see Verizon being anything other than embarassed by the whole affair, but I wonder if this is a case of one individual not thinking, or if this is how Verizon trains its service staff.
old rpm daddy at May 22, 2009 12:47 PM
I can see it now:
Verizon: "Can I help you?"
Police: "Police here, we need a trianglation."
Verizon: "OK, sir. Can I have your account #?"
P:"We don't have an account, we need a call..."
V: "I'll transfer you to sales..."
P: "NO! Let me talk to the manager."
V: "I need an account before I can transfer you. if..."
P: "Fine...my personal account is 555 555 555"
V: "Thank you. I see your account is over due."
P: "fine...this the police I need a call triangulated."
V: "If you aren't going to pay your bill I will need to transfer you to accounts recievable."
....and so on...
Kind of like when I was trying to book a flight online and it kept giving me an error so I called the phone number and he could not help me without a confirmation number which of course I would have needed to book the flight to get.
The Former Banker at May 22, 2009 10:15 PM
I find it hard to believe a big company could be so heartless...
Porky at May 23, 2009 2:46 AM
Oh, don't miss this: XKCD provides solution to Verizon billing
Sometimes I think there are only a couple of hundred people on the Web, because I was reminded of the Verizon piece in totally different ways, yet here we are...
Radwaste at May 23, 2009 7:48 AM
Leave a comment