Gives New Meaning To "Sex-Starved"
Afghan barbarian/President Karzai talked pretty talk about not violating women's rights vis a vis a law allowing Shia men to rape their wives. But then, Human Rights Watch has discovered, a revised version of the law was passed last month, with the creepy passages rewritten like so -- from a Tracy Clark-Flory post on Salon:
The law gives a husband the right to withdraw basic maintenance from his wife, including food, if she refuses to obey his sexual demands. It grants guardianship of children exclusively to their fathers and grandfathers. It requires women to get permission from their husbands to work. It also effectively allows a rapist to avoid prosecution by paying "blood money" to a girl who was injured when he raped her.







So how in the world does Karzai justify this is not violating a woman's rights under Afghan’s supposed constitution? I mean, one would think that the twisted thinking was that a woman became a "wife" after marriage and lost some rights as a human somehow, but that wouldn't even fly with the blood money/rape payments.
Stacy at August 15, 2009 5:38 AM
Good thing we invaded and installed a liberty-lovin' government.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at August 15, 2009 9:02 AM
So, to the feminist-minded here, a man should have no right to ever expect sexual relations with his wife? Legally, the sex act is what finally "consumated" and thus completed the marriage in the first place, isn't it?
What is it that women bring to the table, again? It seems nothing of value, really ....
Jay R at August 15, 2009 4:24 PM
Leave a comment