Protecting The Poor From Keeping The Lights And Heat On
Katherine Mangu-Ward writes at reason about how regulating payday loan stores out of business actually hurts the poor:
As horrifying as 400 percent annual interest sounds, it doesn't reflect the experience of the typical borrower. No one keeps a payday loan for a year; that's not how these things function. Payday lenders charge about $15 per $100 on a seven- or 14-day loan, plus another $20 or so in fees. They check your paperwork and then give you $100 in cash. You leave a post-dated personal check as insurance and promise to come back in two weeks with $135. If you show up empty-handed, or not at all, they cash your check. If the check bounces, the firm sends debt collectors after you--not the knee-breaking kind, but the same guys who interrupt your dinner when you miss a couple of credit card payments. If you miss your deadline to repay, the lender refuses to deal with you again. Nine out of 10 customers pay on time.Extinction by Regulation
My first attempt at a payday loan came at ACE Cash Express in the gentrified Adams Morgan neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Since it was in the middle of a cold snap, I was grateful I didn't have to travel far for my cash. But when I got inside, the elderly woman behind the counter told me the shop no longer offered payday loans, and as far as she knew, neither did anyone else in the city. "Not since they banned them here," she explained, with the air of someone who has answered the same question many times.
In fact, the District of Columbia didn't explicitly ban payday loans, but the city's Payday Loan Consumer Protection Amendment Act of 2008 did cap total costs of loans in the city at 24 percent, which amounted to the same thing. Major payday lenders promptly pulled out of D.C., citing a lack of profitability. Former mayor Marion Barry, now a city councilman, initially co-sponsored the bill but ended up casting the only vote against it. "We are putting this industry out of business," Barry warned. He was right.
At the Virginia lender, a group of women--two of whom were there to pay off loans and one of whom was picking up Chinese food next door--gossiped about the state of the industry. One woman, who kept her fur hat firmly in place while waiting, used to do her loan business downtown at a store near her office. But the interest cap ended that. "They only cash checks and do money orders there now, which doesn't do me a bit of good," she said.
Can't we be grownups for ourselves and learn (or suffer the consequences and maybe then learn) from our mistakes...or choose the best case scenario for ourselves at the time? Government does such a bad job of running things -- shouldn't it run as little as possible?







If you want to keep the heat and lights on for the poor, there are better ways to do that, more directly. (Especially should we move to a "smartgrid".)
However, I do agree that I see little difference between the Payday Loan bandits and the ones at Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, etc., who also rip us off with outrageous fees and policies or just take our money and bet against us. The Payday Loan bandits are arguably more honest.
You may not like gov't regulation, I say we regulate the whole kit'n caboodle out of existence and treat the banks as a public utility.
jerry at September 26, 2009 1:42 AM
I've used them in the past and even recently. I needed to do car repairs between pay days and didn't have room on the credit card.
Ohio passed the same type of laws. Luckily the payday lenders found old laws. Now it is go to one window to get a money order for your check. Cash it next window over. But it is pay $15 for the $100 or pay multiple $35 for overdraft fees.
The politicians need to stay out of it.
Jim P. at September 26, 2009 5:29 AM
Can't we be grownups for ourselves and learn (or suffer the consequences and maybe then learn) from our mistakes...or choose the best case scenario for ourselves at the time?
No.
orthodoc at September 26, 2009 7:57 AM
These companies are not defrauding anyone or being in any way dishonest. Yes, the interest rates and fees are high, but no one is forcing people to do business with them. Leave 'em alone.
Pirate Jo at September 26, 2009 10:04 AM
Spending money on interest and fees at a payday loan store may seem like a stupid way to spend money. But then so are a lot of things. It's stupid to spend money on lottery tickets or gambling. Cigarettes. Junk food. Any restaurant meal over a certain price range. Overpriced designer clothing. $3,000 for a purse. Most plastic surgery. I can sit here and think up hundreds of equally stupid ways to spend money, but we don't legislate them out of business.
The people using these places could change the situation if they wanted to. But they choose not to, so why should that be any concern to the rest of us?
Pirate Jo at September 26, 2009 10:07 AM
Clarification: by "changing the situation" I meant that the people using these stores could stop doing so any time they wanted.
And here's a question - if payday loan stores are "over"-charging their customers, why don't they have competition sprouting up all over the place and undercutting their prices?
I'm not automatically against all regulation. I heard about credit card companies that changed the interest rates on people without warning. One company was holding payments and making its customers incur late fees on purpose. But these cases fall under the existing laws we have against fraud. Why the special attention paid to check-cashing stores?
Pirate Jo at September 26, 2009 10:13 AM
Okay, one more comment, then I'll take a breath and let someone else talk.
My sweety used to manage a rent-to-own store, which is owned by someone who also owns several check-cashing/payday loan shops. Rent-to-own is another high-interest thing. If you're going to buy furniture or electronics, you shouldn't even be buying them on credit. If you're willing to pay a credit card rate, or even a typical financing agreement rate, on a TV, you really should learn something about delayed gratification and buy something cheaper at Wal-Mart until you can afford the high-end one.
However, renting furniture for a few months would be an ideal situation for someone who is traveling on business. That's not a stupid business decision. If you took a six-month contract job in another city, it would be cheaper to rent an apartment and a few pieces of furniture for those six months than to stay in a hotel the entire time. You can't say that in every case, these companies are preying on stupid people with no self-discipline. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Stupid people with no self-discipline cost the rest of us a lot of money in social programs, so if the occasional entrepreneur finds a way to return some of that money to the private sector and create a few jobs, more power to 'em. Harnessing the power of stupid people is a skill to be admired.
Pirate Jo at September 26, 2009 10:26 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/09/26/protecting_the.html#comment-1669688">comment from Pirate JoMy sweety used to manage a rent-to-own store, which is owned by someone who also owns several check-cashing/payday loan shops.
The way to help people, if these legislators or others are so inclined, is not to kill the PayDay loan stores, but to offer free classes in day-to-day economics.
The need to buy new to feel like somebody will put poor people further into the poorhouse. I feel like somebody, so I shop at Goodwill. Have a vaccuum I think of as THE BEAST because it's so powerful. $10 at the Goodwill on Robertson and Venice. "Guess" shirt I wore for a magazine profile on me? $5 at the Goodwill on 11th near Olympic. If I'm buying clothes or other stuff in stores that sell new stuff, it's Loehmann's and it's January or August, when the big sales are on. And then, I buy quality stuff -- I don't know or care what fashion trends are, except in hopes of avoiding looking like I'm following them.
Amy Alkon
at September 26, 2009 11:52 AM
I don't think payday loans are what we need to worry about when it comes to keeping the poor's lights on. I think dumbass liberal "cap and trade" plans that are going to jack up power costs astronomically are what we need to worry about.
if someone wants to pay that kind of interest for a loan, let them. They're adults.
momof4 at September 26, 2009 12:52 PM
They can be real lifesavers. Once my business was doing really badly, and I didn't have enough cash on hand to cover payroll. The bank wouldn't loan me any money for this. I went to a pawn broker, and got a loan at 36% interest, and used the money for payroll.
The business survived, and the loan was paid back when times got better. If I had had to rely on traditional financing, my business would have gone bankrupt and several people would have been out of work.
Even at 36% interest, I think I got a good deal.
Snoopy at September 26, 2009 4:25 PM
This is similar to minimum wage laws. However beneficial they appear to be, they automatically disqualify from employment every person who can't add enough value to an enterprise to be worth the $8.00 per hour. So, the impact on some potential employees is quite cruel.
Jay R at September 26, 2009 4:28 PM
You say that as though it was an unintended consequence.
It is not.
After all, who are you to turn to when nobody will hire you because you don't add value?
The government.
Big Brother loves you.
brian at September 27, 2009 7:02 AM
You are right about the annualized interest rate. If the loan is truly short term, like until your next pay check, the rate of interest matters little. The trick is to rarely if ever have to make use of an online cash advance.
Paul at September 27, 2009 11:42 AM
I appreciate you pointing this out, because it's true that payday loans and cash advances provide financial value. You mentioned ACE, which actually lists reputable studies that confirm payday loans can have a positive effect versus cities and states that don't allow access to these type of short term consumer credit loans.
http://www.acecashexpress.com/ci_resources.php
Andrew Linus at September 30, 2009 5:39 AM
Leave a comment