Narcissism With A Side Of Falafel
Nathalie Rothschild on Spiked on the Gaza flotilla:
The flotilla organisers claim to be acting in solidarity with Palestinians, and no doubt there are many Palestinians who welcome the global media spotlight and the pressure on Israel to ease the blockade on Gaza. But it is a curious type of solidarity that is so singularly narcissistic and self-satisfying.For instance, Alice Walker, author of The Color Purple and one of the most high-profile crew members of the US ship, has said: 'Why am I going on the Freedom Flotilla II to Gaza? I ask myself this, even though the answer is: what else would I do?' Now aged 67, Walker has apparently found a new purpose in life, namely to bring 'letters of love' to the 'children of Palestine'. She sees herself as an experienced elder, bringing words of wisdom and comfort to Gaza's children.
Her focus on Palestinian children is not simply a soppy cliché; rather it's a way of placing herself in the role of mother. She and her boat companions want to care for and protect Gazans, maternally, to feed them and nurture them and give them 'love'. Palestinians are deemed to be helpless not only because they live under a de facto occupation, but because, in the view of the flotilla activists, they are incapable of securing their rights without the benefit of the life experiences of the likes of Walker.
... this is a media stunt disguised as a risqué act of self-sacrifice. This becomes most clear in the activists' insistence that they are putting their lives on the line 'for Palestinians'. In an article for the CNN News website, Walker speculates about what will happen if the Israeli soldiers 'insist on attacking us, wounding us, even murdering us', while Naiman, writing in the Huffington Post, says he is participating 'in this voyage at risk to my life'.
Oh, please. I saw the "peaceful" types on the flotilla beating an Israeli soldier with a pipe.
Indeed, for all the hyping up of the flotilla's non-violent resistance and the crew's ostensible backing of the Palestinians' right to self-determination, in fact the flotilla crew are a war-thirsty, interventionist bunch.
Here's the violence that went down the first time from the "peaceful" operation, and the deal on all the tons and tons of medicine, food, and fuel Israel ships into Gaza (contrary to what the propaganda says):







Reynolds has a link to a post this morning pointing out that, this time, nearly all of the financial and political support for the flotilla is coming from western Europe. (Even though Arabists are pulling the strings via the Turkish government, Europeans are doing all the work.) The article points out the absurdity of all this given the enormous problems western Europe is now facing with the failure of western Europe's blue-state model and the impending disintegration of the euro. Clearly, the western European elites are desperate to find absolutely anything to distract the public's attention from these problems. And so they've seized on the old western European bugaboo -- anti-Semitism.
The Left is placing the pieces on the chessboard for World War III as we speak.
Cousin Dave at July 3, 2011 9:25 AM
BUT
A generation of young Germans had become accustomed to having the entire content of their lives delivered gratis, so to speak, by the public sphere, all the raw material for their deeper emotions…Now that these deliveries suddently ceased, people were left helpless, impoverished, robbed, and disappointed. They had never learned how to live from within themselves, how to make an ordinary private life great, beautiful and worth while, how to enjoy it and make it interesting. So they regarded the end of political tension and the return of private liberty not as a gift, but as a deprivation. They were bored, their minds strayed to silly thoughts, and they began to sulk.
AND
To be precise (the occasion demands precision, because in my opinion it provides the key to the contemporary period of history): it was not the entire generation of young Germans. Not every single individual reacted in this fashion. There were some who learned during this period, belatedly and a little clumsily, as it were, how to live. they began to enjoy their own lives, weaned themselves from the cheap intoxication of the sports of war and revolution, and started to develop their own personalities. It was at this time that, invisibly and unnoticed, the Germans divided into those who later became Nazis and those who would remain non-Nazis.
david foster at July 3, 2011 11:08 AM
(Messed up previous attempt at this comment-sorry)
Sebastian Haffner, in his memoir of growing up in Germany between the wars, had some interesting observations about people who need to get their sense of meaning in life from political activism. When the economic and political climate began to stabilize in the mid-1920s, different people had very different reactions:
"The last ten years were forgotten like a bad dream. The Day of Judgment was remote again, and there was no demand for saviors or revolutionaries…There was an ample measure of freedom, peace, and order, everywhere the most well-meaning liberal-mindedness, good wages, good food and a little political boredom. everyone was cordially invited to concentrate on their personal lives, to arrange their affairs according to their own taste and to find their own paths to happiness."
BUT
"A generation of young Germans had become accustomed to having the entire content of their lives delivered gratis, so to speak, by the public sphere, all the raw material for their deeper emotions…Now that these deliveries suddently ceased, people were left helpless, impoverished, robbed, and disappointed. They had never learned how to live from within themselves, how to make an ordinary private life great, beautiful and worth while, how to enjoy it and make it interesting. So they regarded the end of political tension and the return of private liberty not as a gift, but as a deprivation. They were bored, their minds strayed to silly thoughts, and they began to sulk."
AND
"To be precise (the occasion demands precision, because in my opinion it provides the key to the contemporary period of history): it was not the entire generation of young Germans. Not every single individual reacted in this fashion. There were some who learned during this period, belatedly and a little clumsily, as it were, how to live. they began to enjoy their own lives, weaned themselves from the cheap intoxication of the sports of war and revolution, and started to develop their own personalities. It was at this time that, invisibly and unnoticed, the Germans divided into those who later became Nazis and those who would remain non-Nazis."
david foster at July 3, 2011 11:12 AM
David, nice writeup. It's been interesting for me to watch, over the course of my life, the Left gradually wrap anti-Semitism into itself. And I can't say I'm particularly surprised. I've long suspected that the reason the Left hates Hitler is not for moral reasons; rather, they hate Hitler because Hitler nearly beat them at their own game.
I think this has been posted here before, but I'll post it again: "Who Goes Nazi?", a brilliant article written by Dorothy Thompson for Harper's. Although it was written in 1941, you could some minor tweaks to it and republish it and few people would realize that it wasn't written recently. She describes precisely some of the types of people who fit into what you're talking about. The weaning is about to begin anew, for the simple reason that the coddling can no longer be paid for. Watch what happens next.
Cousin Dave at July 3, 2011 9:17 PM
Cousin Dave...in case you're interested, I reviewed Haffner's book here. He has some things to say about the relationship between Communists and Nazis, using the example of two of his acquaintances:
"They both came from the ‘youth movement’ and both thought in terms of leagues. They were both anti-bourgeois and anti-individualistic. Both had an ideal of ‘community’ and ‘community spirit’. For both, jazz music, fashion magazines…in other words the world of glamour and ‘easy come, easy go’, were a red rag. Both had a secret liking for terror, in a more humanistic garb for the one, more nationalistic for the other. As similar views make for similar faces, they both had a certain stiff, thin-lipped, humourless expression and, incidentally, the greatest respect for each other.”
The Dorothy Thompson piece is very interesting.
David Foster at July 4, 2011 7:10 AM
Cousin Dave:
the reason the Left hates Hitler
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hitler WAS A SOCIALIST.
The Left has successfully brainwashed people into thinking that the Nazis were right-wing fascists. In fact they were socialists - "Nazi" is a nickname for "Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei"
which translates as "German National Socialist Labor Party".
The Nazis ran a centrally controlled economy, national healthcare system, etc.
Ben David at July 4, 2011 8:38 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2011/07/03/narcissism_with.html#comment-2327023">comment from Cousin DaveHitchens has a few questions for the flotilla riders: http://www.slate.com/id/2298332/pagenum/all/
Amy Alkon
at July 4, 2011 8:48 AM
Good coverage here, along with a great photo of the aging hippies involved:
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/07/04/michael-ross-witless-hamas-apologists-denounce-israel-from-sunny-greece/
They must have a lot of mortally embarrassed grandchildren.
Martin at July 4, 2011 12:03 PM
Gefaellt mir, komm doch mal bei mir vorbei!
Alejandro Woleslagle at September 21, 2011 5:58 AM
Leave a comment