The Police State Goes To School
At Lew Rockwell, a blog post cross-posted from End of the American Dream, about very young school children increasingly being arrested, handcuffed and brutalized for the police for ordinary kid misbehavior. A few examples:
#2 In New Haven, Connecticut a 10-year-old boy was actually arrested by police for giving another student "a wedgie" on a school bus.#5 In San Mateo, California a few months ago a 7-year-old special education student was blasted in the face with pepper spray because he would not quit climbing on the furniture. Police were then able to subdue the boy and he was "committed for a psychiatric evaluation".
#6 Down in Florida, an 11-year-old student was arrested by police, thrown in jail and charged with a third-degree felony for bringing a plastic butter knife to school.
#7 In Texas, a 12-year-old girl was recently arrested by police for spraying two bursts of perfume on her neck. She was formally charged with a misdemeanor.
#8 A 13-year-old boy at a public school in Albuquerque, New Mexico was recently arrested by police for burping in class. The police marched him out of school and hauled him over to a juvenile detention center.
#9 Back in 2010, a 12-year-old girl at a school in Forest Hills, New York wrote "I love my friends Abby and Faith" on her desk. The police were called out and she was marched out of her school in handcuffs in front of all her friends.
#10 A teenage couple down in Houston, Texas poured milk on each other during a squabble while they were breaking up a while back. Instead of being sent to see the principal, they were arrested by police and sent to court.
...In our public schools today, even the most minor incident could end up being put on the "permanent record" of your child.
This is especially true for anything having to do with sex. School officials have become hypersensitive when it comes to this area. The following are just a couple of examples....
-When a very young girl recently kissed a very young boy at one Florida elementary school, it was considered to be a "possible sex crime" and the police were called out.
-A 6-year-old boy was recently charged with sexual battery for some "inappropriate touching" during a game of tag at one elementary school in the San Francisco area.
Do you want your child to be charged with a "sex crime" if he inadvertently touches another kid the wrong way?
Do you want your child to be thrown to the floor, handcuffed and hauled off to a mental institution for burping in class or doodling on a desk?
If not, you might want to pull you child out of the government schools while you still can.







I removed my kids from public schools after my sons friend was expelled from the district for the heinous crime of using his finger as a gun while playing “cops and robbers” on the playground. The school charged him with intimidation of another student as well as terroristic threats. He was only 7yrs old at the time,
This country is going to hell faster than you can say it. Sadder yet is that we are complicit by allowing the erosion of our basic freedoms while handing personal accountability over to the government. Shame on us all…..
Ed at April 21, 2012 7:16 AM
The stupidity of a bureaucracy no longer amazes me. If you get to thirty and don't realize that at least one of your parents has had sex at least once you are clueless.
If you are forty -- and don't realize that kids will be kids -- you need to be in an institution that monitors your life for you.
Jim P. at April 21, 2012 8:26 AM
I'm a fourth-generation school teacher. I left teaching public school back in 2004 because I couldn't stand being an enforcement agent for an ever-increasing group of rules and regulations that stripped children of their basic human rights, dignity, and freedom. It is only because of our horrible, prison-like schools that American adults put up with bullshit like the TSA.
I would love to run a dame school out of my house for my friends' children, because they would get a much better education from me and I would be much happier than I am temping, but the government is very, very interested in holding its monopoly over the education of the public, and makes it as hard as possible for people to use alternative education.
The general argument is "we have to make sure kids are getting educated! We can't be sure children are getting a good education at home!" No shit, especially since you can't ensure a good education in your child prison/warehouses.
The public school system is an unmitigated disaster. Even "good schools" aren't that good. Children are not built to be separated from loving caregivers (parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, etc.) for the majority of their lives. And they were not meant to be stacked in neat little rows and have often-useless knowledge jammed into their minds before they are emotionally capable of handling it.
Most homeschoolers (that I know) don't really start "doing school" until the child is 8. Historically, nobody got scared if the kid couldn't read until they were 8 or 9. It was understood that it was far better for the children to play, learn to use their bodies, care for themselves, and yes, begin learning household chores as part of self-care, for the first few years. That was the culture that built this country. Are we better, more responsible people than we were then?
An 8-year-old child who has had exposure to the written word (through parents reading stories, road signs, etc. to them) can be taught phonics and reading in 50 hours. A 6-year-old requires hundreds of hours, because his brain is not ready for that kind of abstraction.
We don't think of it this way because we are adults who've forgotten how weird it is, but the idea of a symbol standing for a sound is not intuitive. It's easy to see a drawing of a cat and understand that means "cat," but to see "ough" and know that makes six different sounds (oh, ooh, uff, off aw, ow) is hard.
Hammering away at a child's mind, forcing him to take in and retain information he cannot, on a developmental level, really understand, is as vicious and penetrative an act as rape.
And we wonder why children hate school!
The Original Kit at April 21, 2012 11:27 AM
Really? Schooling is rape, now? Is there anything that ISN'T?
My kids understood quite readily what they were reading in kinder. WHo are you to decide when kids are ready for what? They're 7 now, and their current favorite book is their Gpa's army survival guide he got when he enlisted a LONG time ago. And according to you, they should not even read yet because they can't understand the concept? Do your friends a favor and don't open a school.
momof4 at April 21, 2012 1:51 PM
Are any links to the original individual stories? All I get is the same list posted on right wing blogs.
Kelly M Bray at April 21, 2012 3:41 PM
So, basically, the only thing you won't get in trouble for at school is failing to learn...
Radwaste at April 21, 2012 5:40 PM
@TheOriginalKit: You have really strange ideas of children's mental development. Kids of average intelligence naturally learn to read simple words by the age of 4 or 5, just by following along in children's books (assuming that their parents read to them on a regular basis). There's nothing "weird" about symbols standing for sounds: the human brain is wired for abstraction. Formalizing the reading process with phonics first-grade is important, as gives them a better basis to read words they haven't seen before.
Your comments about home-schooled kids not learning to read until the age of 8 is an excuse used by parents who are *failing* to educate their kids. "Historically" kids didn't have time for schooling, because they were out grubbing in the fields from dawn to dusk.
Home schooling done right requires discipline, organization and a lot of time. It also requires a certain temperament: most adults do not have the patience and ability to teach children well. The fact is: many home schooling parents would be better off getting a job, and using the extra money to send their kids to a private school.
a_random_guy at April 21, 2012 9:47 PM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/04/21/the_police_stat_1.html#comment-3152604">comment from Kelly M BrayKelly, is it really that hard for you to click on the Lew Rockwell link? Do you only get one action on your computer per nickel you put in the slot, and was posting that comment it?
Amy Alkon
at April 21, 2012 9:59 PM
momof4, I am happy for you that your children are smart and love reading. I am happy for your children that they grew up in an environment that nurtured them. Of course offering information to children who want it is good. I'm talking about force. I have personally seen the damage it does.
I spent the entire time I taught in public school as well as the years I have tutored attempting to undo the damage caused by FORCE, not love. I am talking about the degradation of the soul and mind of a child who is made to feel inadequate because their brains aren't ready yet.
I'm talking about the kids I worked with who begged for someone to help them, who told me about how much they dreaded school, hated their teachers, and the feelings of inadequacy and shame they carried from elementary school on.
I've seen the damage, and tried to help these kids, so yes, I do think that the soul-crushing methods and structure of schooling is horrible. I've seen the results. And as far as opening a school goes, my friends whose kids have gone from failing to acing their classes think differently.
a_random_guy, my "strange ideas" are based on the research I have put into learning how the brain works and develops. I'm sorry you disagree.
My experience with children who grow up in homeschool families where they "start late" is that by the time they are in the middle school age, they are typically ahead. Yes, there are bad, lazy parents homeschooling, but my experience has shown them to be the minority. People generally don't get into homeschooling because they're lazy parents.
The Original Kit at April 21, 2012 10:28 PM
John Dewey was a social planner in education and a still celebrated founder of our modern public schools:
"Independent self-reliant people would be a counterproductive anachronism in the collective society of the future where people will be defined by their associations (1896)."
"The children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society that is coming, where everyone would be interdependent (1899)."
Andrew_M_Garland at April 22, 2012 11:57 AM
Kit, I know too many kids who learned to read at 4 or 5 because they wanted to, because they loved the written word, not because they were forced to. These weren't super-genius kids. Just bright kids who grew up with books. Learning to read is not soul-crushing for most children.
The argument that we should do things the way they were done 200 years ago because that's somehow better falls flat. Things were done the way they were done because it suited the culture of the time. My father got his first job at 6 years old in 1927. His parents never bothered much with his education because it didn't matter to them, and they were barely educated themselves. He was barely literate, and by the time I was in the 3rd grade, I was helping him with his reading. In his time period, it still worked out fine because he could earn a middle-class income through hard labor alone. That's far less true now.
Maybe we could hold off educating kids until they are 8 or 9, but other parents won't be doing that. Chinese parents most certainly won't be doing that.
MonicaP at April 22, 2012 4:37 PM
Leave a comment