Cutting Back Wheat 80 Or 90 Percent Doesn't Give You MOST Of The Benefits
Important post by Dr. William Davis, author of Wheat Belly.
He writes on his blog:
Let me explain. If you cut back on sugar by 90%, you obtain 90% of the benefits, right? 90% less weight gain, 90% less insulin provocation, 90% less dental cavities, etc. Simple arithemetic.But, as with many things in this wheat-distorted world, that simple arithmetic does not hold with cutting back on wheat. Instead, a bizarre calculus of metabolic distortions apply because of several long-lasting effects of modern semi-dwarf wheat.
...2) Small LDL particles that cause heart disease are triggered for 10 or more days at a time
Large, relatively benign LDL particles persist for 24-48 hours after formation, cleared by the liver promptly. Small LDL particles, triggered to extravagant degrees by the amylopectin A of wheat, persist for an unusually long period, much longer than the larger LDL particles. Once triggered, the human liver does not recognize unnatural small LDL particles, causing them to persist for an abnormally long time and allowing prolonged and repetitive interactions with the wall of arteries to create atherosclerosis (leading to coronary heart disease, heart attacks, stents, bypass surgery, as well as your hospital to boast about its record number of heart attacks treated)....4) Glycation is forever
Recall from the discussion in Wheat Belly that, whenever blood glucose ranges above 90 mg/dl (5 nmol/L), glucose-modification of long-lived proteins in the body, or glycation, proceeds at an accelerated rate: the higher the blood glucose, the greater the quantity of glycation.It means, for instance, that you have, say, a Snickers bar and experience a blood glucose of 134 mg/dl and glycation occurs in the proteins of the lenses of your eyes (cataracts), the proteins in the cartilage of knees and hips (brittle cartilage, arthritis), the proteins in the cells lining arteries (stiff arteries, hypertension, atherosclerosis), and structural tissue of the skin (wrinkles, "liver" spots of aging). Have two slices of whole wheat bread as a ham sandwich and blood sugar peaks at 170 mg/dl (a very typical blood sugar after wheat consumption) and glycation develops at a greater rate. Glycation in long-lived proteins is irreversible-the effect cannot be undone: cataracts do not reverse, bone-on-bone arthritis does not regenerate, wrinkles do not unwrinkle. For all practical purposes, once you glycate, you glycate for good.
Listen to Davis on my radio show:
Advice Goddess Radio: Cardiologist Dr. William Davis on why wheat is the single worst thing you can eat. (There's no such thing as "healthy whole grains.")http://www.blogtalkradio.com/amyalkon/2012/08/13/advice-goddess-radio-amy-alkon







« Previous link doesn't work
Hello at October 3, 2012 3:31 AM
Thanks, but it worked for me. What happened when you clicked it?
Amy Alkon at October 3, 2012 8:51 AM
Amy,
Any idea where one could get flour from "old school" wheat - in the event one decided to bake something as a treat? Have you heard anything on that (or even know what the wheat is called)?
Thanks!
Shannon M. Howell at October 3, 2012 9:02 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/10/03/cutting_back_wh.html#comment-3358581">comment from Shannon M. HowellEinkorn and Emmer are the kinds of wheat that aren't the hybrids, but I believe you can use almond flour (flour made of almonds).
Amy Alkon
at October 3, 2012 9:03 AM
There are actually lots of decent GF options out there now for dessert baking. I do not know if GF automatically means wheat-free, though. Anyone?
I am going to look for almond flour. Does it have protein in it? I'm guessing so...
momof4 at October 3, 2012 11:46 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/10/03/cutting_back_wh.html#comment-3358838">comment from momof4It does have protein in it -- it's ground nuts. But, it's problematic in certain ways to eat a good bit of it frequently. I can't remember why.
Amy Alkon
at October 3, 2012 12:10 PM
"Gluten free" is always wheat free. For a great resource on baking with almond flour (and gluten-free food & products) go to http://www.elanaspantry.com/
My other favorite is http://glutenfreegirl (.com).
The best website for science info on celiac is http://www.cureceliacdisease (.org).
Going gluten free is more complicate than simply avoiding "wheat," as rye and barley are in the wheat family (yet buckwheat is not), and wheat flour is often an invisible ingredient - used in most soy sauces, used to dust conveyor belts for non-wheat foods, survives the fermentation process and is in most beer, etc.
Also, many processed & prepared foods that are marketed as gluten free simply use sugar to hold together other flours mad ewith other grains, such as rice - so those gluten free foods are still loaded with simple carbs.
Michelle at October 3, 2012 6:47 PM
Thanks all!
I don't bake often, but if I'm going to indulge... well then I'm actually going to indulge. For instance, I plan on making something gooey and/or sweet for my 10 year anniversary next year... like a big ol' chocolate cake topped with home made ice cream (or maybe real whipped cream).
:)
Picked up my low carb diet again. Down another 4 pounds. Have to have my blood lipids tested again soon. Hope to drop 5 more first. Thankfully, said anniversary isn't until spring of next year :)
Shannon M. Howell at October 4, 2012 5:46 AM
So basically, if you don't cut out 100% you may as well eat as much as you want because cutting back doesn't cut it?
NicoleK at October 4, 2012 8:43 AM
We are having pizza with an almond flour crust for dinner tonight. It's a different taste than wheat or whole wheat crust, but we have grown to love it.
During the winter (it feels like winter today), we have this pizza 3 or 4 times a month without the guilt of going off the low carb WOE.
Steamer at October 4, 2012 8:50 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/10/03/cutting_back_wh.html#comment-3361835">comment from NicoleKSo basically, if you don't cut out 100% you may as well eat as much as you want because cutting back doesn't cut it?
If you see how you eat as some mean game being played against you instead of as the way to be the healthiest you can for the longest you can, I guess that's the logic to go by.
Amy Alkon
at October 4, 2012 9:10 AM
It does have protein in it -- it's ground nuts. But, it's problematic in certain ways to eat a good bit of it frequently. I can't remember why.
Omega-6 fats
Engineer at October 4, 2012 11:55 AM
"So basically, if you don't cut out 100% you may as well eat as much as you want because cutting back doesn't cut it?"
Or, do as well as you can in the circumstances in which you find yourself, and over time you'll find that you can do better, including having quick fixes to less than ideal circumstances (long road trips, dinner parties, etc.).
I found it hard - frustrating - at first, but stuck with it long enough to have my health improve. Once you feel better, it gets so much easier to turn down wheat-based foods, because the negative impact is almost instant - feeling groggy and foggy headed after eating a bagel, or feeling your mind race after eating a regular cookie very quickly creates a negative association with those foods, and you'll start to avoid them the way you avoid slamming your hand in a car door.
It's easier to avoid wheat these days, as more and more places offer "gluten free" options. Last night I had a gluten free pizza delivered at work, and tonight I had tacos with corn tortillas. The carbs are manageable for me when paired with protein and fat (cheese!). Au bon pain, Pret A Manger, and other fast food chains offer plenty of gluten free, and therefore wheat-free options.
Also, I forgot to mention the good news that gluten does not survive the distillation process, so while most beers are out, liquor is still in.
Michelle at October 4, 2012 8:41 PM
I have a wheat free mini-pizza recipe:
Take a heaping tablespoon or two of parmesan or similar hard cheese and make a little mound on a wax-paper-lined cookie sheet.
Put a little bit of softer cheese such as provolone or mozzarella on top.
Bake until melted. This is your crust.
Remove from oven, and put some tomato sauce, toppings, and mozzarella or pizza-mix cheese on top.
Bake until cheese is melted.
The trick is the parmesan makes the crust crusty, but having a little bit of softer cheese keeps it from being too brittle.
NicoleK at October 5, 2012 3:48 AM
Otzi, the 5000 year old mummy found in the Alps, had hardening of the arteries. The only wheat available then was einkorn.
I think a lot of people could benefit from a gluten free diet, but I doubt if it is the miracle cure for heart disease that people hope that it is. And I don't think reliable scientific evidence indicates that modern wheat is poison either. Most sedentary people could benefit from a low carb diet, but a pro athlete would probably starve on it.
Isab at October 5, 2012 2:22 PM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/10/03/cutting_back_wh.html#comment-3362815">comment from IsabAnd I don't think reliable scientific evidence indicates that modern wheat is poison either. .
I'm always such a fan of comments where people pull stuff out of their ass.
There is substantial evidence that wheat is very bad for you -- just not on "CNN Health." Just yesterday, some new NBC LA reporter was tweeting dietary information that is the antithesis of what the evidence says. Davis lays it out in detail in his book.
Most sedentary people could benefit from a low carb diet, but a pro athlete would probably starve on it
On the contrary, per research by dietary researcher Stephen Phinney, the co-author of dietary Jeff Volek, of what Dr. Michael Eades calls the best low-carb book out there, The Art and Science of Low Carbohydrate Living: An Expert Guide to Making the Life-Saving Benefits of Carbohydrate Restriction Sustainable and Enjoyable.
I did a show on the book with Volek:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/amyalkon/2012/07/02/advice-goddess-radio-amy-alkon
For more on what benefits athletes -- based on science, not asslint:
Fred Hahn on science-based exercise, and why slow-speed strength training, for just 12-15 minutes a week, will make you healthier than running marathons:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/amyalkon/2012/10/01/advice-goddess-radio-amy-alkon
Amy Alkon
at October 5, 2012 2:37 PM
As usual you are ignoring my point. Marathoners dont run marathons to get in shape, bicycle riders dont ride the tour de France to get in shape either. They pick their diet to provide quick fuel to keep them going for hours. They arent eating steak on the route for a reason. They need 6000 calories or more in an easy form that quikly converts to glucose to fuel their muscles. ALL FOOD CONVERTS TO GLUCOSE, carbs just do it at a faster rate, and in a more direct form.
I can point you to thosands of people who eat a diet high in modern wheat who have absolutely no signs of heart disease. An indirect tenuous correlation between fat people whose diet is usually very high in carbs, which are mostly empty calories, and heart disease is not causation.
One of the things that makes the Otzi case so interesting was evidence of heart disease totally unrelated to obesity and the modern lifestyle, indicating that there is most probably a huge genetic factor.
Isab at October 5, 2012 3:52 PM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/10/03/cutting_back_wh.html#comment-3362867">comment from IsabIsab, you don't know what you're talking about - on either diet or exercise and are posting entirely contrary to what the evidence says. Stephen Phinney did a study on cyclists. He is one. I'm working with my editor now so I can't post more than this, but your ideas about are based on your ideas, not science.
Amy Alkon
at October 5, 2012 4:21 PM
It is extremely easy to tell someone "they don't know what they are talking about" when you are unwilling to debate specifics.
What part of "your body converts food to glucose" do you not believe?
What part of thousands (actually millions) of people eat lots of wheat with no bad effects) are you refuting?
What part of "Ozti had heart disease" (in an era before modern wheat existed) do you not believe?
I have watched the diet profession go through cycles of demonizing one food after another, over the last 60 years. Your sources are slightly ahead of the USDA who still thinks that fat is the problem, but that doesn't make them right either. The human body is a very complex system, and I would run very far away from anyone who recklessly claimed the have "the" answer.
Isab at October 6, 2012 8:45 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/10/03/cutting_back_wh.html#comment-3363206">comment from IsabIt's not that I'm "not willing to debate specifics" but that I wrote yesterday until 5:30 pm and then left with Gregg and was out late and just woke up. The "specifics" have been laid out here a million times. I just woke up and I'm not going to be even later to my cafe where I write on Saturday because you have something up your butt and believe, sans evidence, that you know something.
I told you Stephen Phinney did a study on cyclists: look it up.
Per Gary Taubes' "Good Calories, Bad Calories," which is basically a 600-page meta-analysis (study of studies) it is carbohydrates -- sugar, flour, starchy vegetables like potatoes, apple juice -- that cause the insulin secretion that puts on fat.
Read Davis' book instead of saying (inanely) that "lots of people eat lots of wheat with no bad effects."
If you are too lazy, cheap or poor to read it, here's my radio show with him:
Advice Goddess Radio: Cardiologist Dr. William Davis on why wheat is the single worst thing you can eat. (There’s no such thing as “healthy whole grains.”)
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/amyalkon/2012/08/13/advice-goddess-radio-amy-alkon
Amy Alkon
at October 6, 2012 9:03 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/10/03/cutting_back_wh.html#comment-3363213">comment from IsabYour body doesn't need carbs to convert to glucose, nor are they good for you, save for the sort of carbs I'm eating now -- a bowl of kale cooked crispy in bacon fat.
I just spent a good deal of time talking (for hours) last night to Dr. Mary Dan Eades, who just lost her sister to cancer, and who now has a very different attitude on whether one can "cheat" with wheat, etc. It's just not worth it for all the ill-effects it causes.
If you want to continue with them because you are too lazy to look up the sources, and because I'm not going to turn into your source slave here, well, have at it. Sort up a piece of bread.
If you want sources, look at http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/ and look up Taubes, Eades, Volek, and Dr. William Davis on this site.
Here's a biology researcher who gets it: http://freetheanimal.com/2011/03/phd-med-school-biology-researcher-goes-paleo-racks-up-70-pound-weight-loss-gets-hot.html
Amy Alkon
at October 6, 2012 9:07 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/10/03/cutting_back_wh.html#comment-3363301">comment from Amy AlkonPhinney, "Ketogenic diets and physical performance": http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC524027/
Amy Alkon
at October 6, 2012 11:19 AM
Leave a comment