Napolitano On FBI: "If They Can Do This To Petraeus, They Can Do This To Anybody"
Very interesting piece by Matthew Boyle, interviewing Judge Andrew Napolitano at The Daily Caller:
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano told The Daily Caller that, during its investigation of former CIA Director David Petraeus and his biographer, the FBI appears to have wrongfully treated a simple domestic dispute like a national security or criminal matter....Napolitano said the federal investigation was "the use of law enforcement either for a personal vendetta that [Tampa military liaison Jill] Kelley pushed through her FBI agent connection, or a political vendetta - somebody wanting to silence, by embarrassing, humiliating and destroying the credibility of Petraeus."
"Not only does it not appear there was a crime committed," Napolitano continued, "[and] not only does it not appear that there was a national security implication, but this is hardly the type of thing that the FBI investigates. This was instigated, apparently, by the Kelley woman, and her friend in the FBI. That is an inappropriate means to commence an investigation by the FBI."
Napolitano, who is a former New Jersey Superior Court judge, said federal agents, like members of the judiciary, are typically prohibited from working on cases that present a conflict of interest. (RELATED: CIA denies claim it held hostages at Libya annex)
"In fact, the FBI has an internal rule that if an FBI agent knows the complainant, the victim or the target, that FBI agent cannot have anything to do with the case, because that often clouds an individual's judgment," Napolitano continued. "It's like a judge trying a case in which he knows one of the parties. It's prohibited, and the judge has to reveal that, and get off the case. The principle is the same for the FBI. For that reason, I don't believe the government's version of these events."
According to numerous reports, the FBI began its investigation after Kelley told an agent, whom she knew as a friend, that she had received harassing emails from an anonymous source. The emails, which the agency eventually traced back to Petraeus biographer Paula Broadwell, appeared to be an attempt to intimidate Kelley into staying away from Petraeus.
"It's inconceivable that the FBI decided to do an investigation based on one email between two private people, whether it mentions Petraeus' name or not," Napolitano added. "I don't know what criminal charges could be filed. It's not a crime for Mrs. Broadwell to send an email to Mrs. Kelley saying, 'Stay away from my guy.'"
via @smallggay







This article contains the point of view of the FBI and Kelly:
Veteran F.B.I. Agent Helped Start Petraeus E-Mail Inquiry
It says that the agent (Kelly's friend) did not conduct the investigation (though he tried to butt in) and that his "topless shirt" picture was a joke one sent as part of group of family pictures. The FBI investigation was triggered by a concern that two high-ranked generals were being "cyber-stalked."
So who knows? Yesterday, I said what Napolitano said above, that Kelly was on a revenge kick. It's so tempting to speculate even when one knows how limited and often inaccurate the media articles are. Presumably, the FBI should have backed off once the source of the emails was determined but maybe then the issue of Broadwell's access to classified materials came up.
For today at least I'm less inclined to see it as yet another example of law enforcement overreach. Tomorrow may be different, but I can at least predict that the calls for the release of the topless pic of the FBI agent will be dropping off substantially.
Astra at November 15, 2012 6:25 AM
this is Vendetta to silence Patraeus, that went awry, I'm thinkin' The have internal investigative arms in the CIA to investigate security clearence issues and whatnot... if there was an investigation into infidelity [which might compromise clearance] it would be handed off to them.
there is a reason this is out in the open... it's not clear what it is. Head of CIA... this guy should have been untouchable, unless his boss wanted him touched.
SwissArmyD at November 15, 2012 8:41 AM
Gee, who is surprised about this. Whatever is put out on Internet is open to all.....Welcome to the 21st Century FOX
Ludwig at November 15, 2012 8:41 AM
The inmates are running the asylum.
Cousin Dave at November 15, 2012 1:28 PM
Again: SEX is the BEST way to distract the public.
Just now, when you read that word, you forgot about everything else.
Even Monica Lewinsky, directly involved with a President, was an effective diversion from that President's policies.
Want to do what you want in government? Just give the public bread and circuses. It's worked for millennia.
Radwaste at November 16, 2012 4:48 AM
I think I know where there can be some cuts made in the Federal budget.
MarkD at November 16, 2012 5:28 AM
Leave a comment