Government Will Protect, Uh, Poison You
If you have two thoughts to rub together, and you rub them in the direction of government for 20 minutes or so, it should occur to you that government is not the benevolent auntie so many like to believe it is:
There's a story on Slate that reflects that -- about how the U.S. government poisoned alcohol during prohibition. Deborah Blum writes:
It was Christmas Eve 1926, the streets aglitter with snow and lights, when the man afraid of Santa Claus stumbled into the emergency room at New York City's Bellevue Hospital. He was flushed, gasping with fear: Santa Claus, he kept telling the nurses, was just behind him, wielding a baseball bat.Before hospital staff realized how sick he was--the alcohol-induced hallucination was just a symptom--the man died. So did another holiday partygoer. And another. As dusk fell on Christmas, the hospital staff tallied up more than 60 people made desperately ill by alcohol and eight dead from it. Within the next two days, yet another 23 people died in the city from celebrating the season.
Doctors were accustomed to alcohol poisoning by then, the routine of life in the Prohibition era. The bootlegged whiskies and so-called gins often made people sick. The liquor produced in hidden stills frequently came tainted with metals and other impurities. But this outbreak was bizarrely different. The deaths, as investigators would shortly realize, came courtesy of the U.S. government.
Frustrated that people continued to consume so much alcohol even after it was banned, federal officials had decided to try a different kind of enforcement. They ordered the poisoning of industrial alcohols manufactured in the United States, products regularly stolen by bootleggers and resold as drinkable spirits. The idea was to scare people into giving up illicit drinking. Instead, by the time Prohibition ended in 1933, the federal poisoning program, by some estimates, had killed at least 10,000 people.







Paraquat? 1970's? Anyone?
Remember this? I was kind of distracted at the time, and it's just one thread in the weave of silly paranoias that happened to people who were trying to 'relax' when Jerry Ford was president.
This was back in the day.
Crid [CridComment at gmail] at December 25, 2012 1:58 AM
Yo.
Crid [CridComment at gmail] at December 25, 2012 2:01 AM
"Industrial" alcohol?
Be sure you have the right isomer. Methanol can be perfectly pure and produce these effects. A manufacturing process MUST have the right isomer, or the chemical process will fail. This means labeling is present.
You know non-medical nitrous oxide and propane both have other substances in them, too, don't you? The nitrous to prevent you from killing yourself on the hot rod's bottle, the propane to let you detect leakage.
Radwaste at December 25, 2012 5:43 AM
This story: US Marines to face random blood-alcohol tests comes from the AP so apparently true.
They aren't saying that they are going to test while the troops are just on duty. Because if you go by a dorm at 8PM and test, I bet you can find a few marines with a .15 BAC easily, let alone a .01.
But even on duty, you can get a .01 by using mouth wash. This is just stupid.
Jim P. at December 25, 2012 6:44 AM
Random trivia question: name the actor:
"You human paraquat!"
no googling!
Eric at December 25, 2012 9:48 AM
Jeff Bridges?
cars at December 25, 2012 10:06 AM
You win a new car! The Big Lebowski.
Eric at December 25, 2012 10:26 AM
Darwin wins.
jefe at December 26, 2012 5:24 PM
Leave a comment