How The Tax Man Transformed What Music People Listened To
Eric Felten writes in the WSJ of the stiff wartime "cabaret tax" -- a ruinous 30% (later merely a destructive 20%) excise applied to all receipts at any venue that served food or drink and allowed dancing, leading to the end of the Big Band era:
The name of the "cabaret tax" suggested the bite would be reserved for swanky boîtes such as the Stork Club, posh "roof gardens," and other elegant venues catering to the rich.But shortly after the tax was imposed, the Bureau of Internal Revenue offered this expansive definition of where it applied: "A roof garden or cabaret shall include any room in any hotel, restaurant, hall or other public place where music or dancing privileges or any other entertainment, except instrumental or mechanical music alone, is afforded the patrons in connection with the serving or selling of food, refreshments or merchandise."
The tax hit not just swells, but anyone who liked to go out dancing--which in those days included just about everyone who went out at all.
...The tax-law regulation's other exception had the biggest impact. Clubs that provided strictly instrumental music to which no one danced were exempt from the cabaret tax. It is no coincidence that in the back half of the 1940s a new and undanceable jazz performed primarily by small instrumental groups--bebop--emerged as the music of the moment.
"The spotlight was on instrumentalists because of the prohibitive entertainment taxes," the great bebop drummer Max Roach was quoted in jazz trumpeter Dizzy Gillespie's memoirs, "To Be or Not to Bop." "You couldn't have a big band because the big band played for dancing."
The federal excise tax inadvertently spurred the bebop revolution: "If somebody got up to dance, there would be 20% more tax on the dollar. If someone got up there and sang a song, it would be 20% more," Roach said. "It was a wonderful period for the development of the instrumentalist."
Bebop radically transformed jazz. But how differently might the aesthetic impulse behind bebop have been expressed if it had been allowed to develop organically instead of in an atmosphere where dancing was discouraged by the taxman? Jazz might have remained a highly sophisticated popular music instead of becoming an artsy niche.
The cabaret tax was finally eliminated in 1965.







Bebop is autistic music.
Belle at March 18, 2013 7:56 AM
That's an interesting theory. Bebop does have pre-war antecedents. And by 1950, the national mood had changed, and there was a feeling at that time that swing was pretty well played out. A lot of swing's celebrities and leaders were either dead (Glenn Miller) or close to retirement (Artie Shaw, Tommy Dorsey), and some others, like Raymond Scott, had moved pretty far from swing's roots. The nation's dancers were about to discover rock and Latin, and move away from jazz.
Also, it was always expensive to field a big band, simply because of the number of people and stuff that needed to be transported. The dirty little secret was that a lot of swing outfits didn't actually travel with the whole band; they had sidemen lined up in each city that they travelled to. Nonetheless, there was a core of at least 6-7 players plus the band leader, and all of their stuff. The travel expenses were a lot lower for a bebop trio, with sax and bass (the pianist would use whatever piano the venue had).
Still, it's an interesting theory. And it explains a lot about why dancing in general declined in popularity in the U.S. from about 1960 until the disco era of the 1970s.
Cousin Dave at March 18, 2013 8:35 AM
☑ Original post
☑ Belle's comment
☑ Cousin Dave's comment
Crid [CridComment at gmail] at March 18, 2013 9:47 PM
Leave a comment