How to SECEDE in politics without really trying.

Regarding all these politicians who insist upon biblical principles and demand that gays be put to death, normally I would ask why they don't call for the stoning of Bristol Palin, who became pregnant out of wedlock.

I would ask that, except I don't feel like reading another one of Charles' lengthy cuckoo rants. "Stop attacking Sarah Palin!"

I would actually prefer politicians put there money where their mouth is. Take the saying "My word is my bond" and reverse it to become "My bond is my word."

If a politician put all of his assets on the table and states his primary platform and they stuck to it - that would be amazing. This could work for both sides of the table. Politician says they will only stay in for two terms then put some money behind it. If a politician says they will fight for family values then they will have to state their goals and not deviate even if it will not be political expedient.

Just think about it
https://www.bondedtermlimits.org/

ohh Patrick he looks like another David Duke. A character the so called "typical" Republican/Conservative the democrats/liberals like cry as a bogeyman.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke

Like the formula take one extreme candidate then say all other of his persuasion are just like them. Yet the person is not even a successful candidate your above person has not once held office. Hey has run a few times but never held office. Always a brides maid never a bride. David Duke only held a state legislature position. Yet cause of his past many Republicans got tarred by his actions.

Yet scream away Patrick the sky is falling the sky is falling look look the Republicans want to stone people. Or look another Christian wants to kill or keep down gays. Yep lump all them together.

I think most Americans should not be worried about that guy as I would rate him a low-medium to low threat.

No when it comes to liberals there we can see real hypocrites.

Movie stars who say we must make sacrifices to save the planet but life styles are more damaging them 10 typical families. Plus will not follow their own words.

or

Democrat backed business or rich people who says that the tax rate for rich people and companies needs to be raised to help the country/people but continue to use tax holes and shelters for themselves. Looking at you Mr. Buffet.

UK government finally pardons Alan Turing, the leader of the team that broke the Nazi's Enigma encryption machine during WWII. Turing was convicted of homosexuality and forced to accept chemical castration via injections of estrogen. He developed an obsession with the Snow White story and committed suicide by eating a poisoned apple.

"No when it comes to liberals there we can see real hypocrites."

Ah, hyperbole. Nothing new to see here, folks.

Move along.

Christmas story of courage!

Read this and try not to get all weepy, ok?

Just try.

"Regarding all these politicians who insist upon biblical principles and demand that gays be put to death"

Earth to Patrick.

Palins live in your head.

You are correct Mr. Gog. I will admit to show that there are hypocrites on both sides of the aisle.

Also trying to point out that the "candidate" Patrick was pointing out is not typical but an aberration. That their belief is not all persons belief. Singular or minority does not mean majority.

I don't care, I don't care!

Amy, check this out:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/24/a-manufacturer-found-a-loophole-around-that-incandescent-light-bulb-ban/

Light at the end of the bureaucratic tunnel!!

"Ah, hyperbole."

Funny that. Look, he was talking about Patrick.

Who's screaming, "The sky is falling!" numbnuts?

Not I. Did I suggest that Kilgore has any reasonable chance of winning? Nope.

But if he's running for office, he's a politician, his chances of winning are irrelevant to that fact. I would just like to know if all these political figures who self-righteously advocate death for homosexuals on the grounds that it's biblical, would apply these biblical principles, to say, Sarah Palin's daughter Bristol, who was impregnated and had a child out of wedlock. According to the Bible, she should be stoned. I'd like to know if Kilgore would be consistent and actually agree that Bristol should be killed.

How about Mississippi State Rep Andy Gipson, who similarly believes that gays should be put to death? How about the Salvation Army?

I'd like to know the answer to this. Wouldn't you? Because if they say no, they're hypocrites, you know? And it would suggest to me that they are simply voting the politics of homophobia, and biblical principles is their facade.

How do they feel about the fact that the Bush twins are alive? According to Deuteronomy 21:18-21, those two should have been stoned.

But, awww...poor John Paulson and Dave B., did I huwt your widdle feewings when I mentioned Sarah Palin? Well, you just log right off and have a good cry, then. You'll feel better.

It's a little hard to avoid bringing her up when she claims to advocate for biblical principles when those same principles would put her daughter to death for having a child out of wedlock, and probably her as well, for trying to exert authority over men.

I would ask that, except I don't feel like reading another one of Charles' lengthy cuckoo rants. "Stop attacking Sarah Palin!"

Thats becasue you are stupid Patrick. Such a question has nothing to do with the Palins, it highlights the hypocrisy of a bible thumper cherry picking the bible by juxtaposing the belief with a sacred cow of their political party.

Also, it may just be personal anecdotal data, but in my experience most of the "violent solution" anti gay folks, are gay themselves

"I would just like to know if all these political figures who self-righteously advocate death for homosexuals on the grounds that it's biblical"

I'm responding to your use of "all." You make it sound like it is common. It's not. It's just in your head.

"It's a little hard to avoid bringing her up"

Dude, it's hard for you to avoid bringing her up. You are addicted to the Palins - you just don't see it like most addicts.

"did I huwt your widdle feewings when I mentioned Sarah Palin?"

Uh, no. You did hurt more than my feelings though when you voted for Obama, twice.

I did not vote for Obama, once or twice, you fucking lying piece of shit.

Wow, an actual statement of fact.

What did you expect would be assumed about your vote, when you are seen to back the Obama administration enthusiastically?

See comments above: John Paulson isn't from the United States, but wants to influence your opinion about:

• Term limits (presumably for USA political offices)

• Republicans

• Democrats

• David Duke of Lousiana

• Warren Buffett of Nebraska

• "Threats" to Americans, and "Expedience"

…Even though he's not in America, and isn't American himself. He's so certain about the direction of our national character that he doesn't even bother to tell us he's not part of it.

These whackballs are so glib in their delusion that they're incapable of shame. Their cheery, part-of-the-team enthusiasm has a distilled, corrosive pathos you'll see in no other corner of internet... The guys logging onto FatBeachGranny dot com are more abashed (and reflective) about their fantasy choices.

Imagine how they talk when they're at lunch with a married couple. Or with someone who —I don't know— runs a business or something. "Y'know, Doc, you'd get more value out of that MRI machine if you'd...."

I'm seriously starting to wonder why these goof-buns congregate so specifically at Amy's blog. Why are so very many of them from Canada?

While I have no objections to anyone from Canada (or anywhere else, for that matter) posting here, I have to agree that it seems somewhat smug for non-Americans to lecture us about what's wrong with our nation and how to improve it.

Perhaps it's a Canadian thing. I notice Justin Bieber, worst of all Canadian imports, has no problem sharing his 19-year-old wisdom on everything that's wrong with the U.S., despite that the U.S. has put more money in his pocket than any other nation, including his own.

"you fucking lying piece of shit."

Dude, you fooled me. I thought for sure you voted for Obama twice. You are such a suck up for his policies.

Let me change that to you hurt my feelings every time you support his policies. PDS is your problem, not mine.

Do I support his policies? Good question. And not really one that I've answered.

I just find the selective collective amnesia on this board to be marvelous. We loathe the TSA, we foam with rage over the NSA...yet, somehow, we seem to think that these were put in place by Obama, and it's his fault that they exist.

I'm quite sure, to someone like you, with your rampant ODS, it might seem like I'm a supporter of Obama and his policies. This board leans so far to the right that it would capsize if this were a ship.

These policies didn't seem nearly so onerous six years ago, when Bush was President. It seems be because we now have a nasty old Democrat, we suddenly don't feel so good about the relentless spying.

If it were up to you, and the rest of this board, the NSA and the TSA would only be allowed under Republican presidents, to be put on hiatus when a Democrat attains the White House.

You simply wouldn't know a suck up for Obama's policies. You and objectivity are mutually exclusive terms.

"we seem to think that these were put in place by Obama, and it's his fault that they exist."

"We." There you go again. We and all seem to be your favorites.

"These policies didn't seem nearly so onerous six years ago, when Bush was President."

"These policies" - say what. Let's add these policies to the we and all.

"If it were up to you"

No silly, not me.

"You simply wouldn't know a suck up for Obama's policies. You and objectivity are mutually exclusive terms."

Oh. Ok. Actually you don't know that. About me and objectivity being mutually exclusive - have any facts to point that out or are you just playing with your imagination again?

"and so this is Christmas...

"and what have you done...

"another year over...

"a new one just begun..."

Oh fuck it, here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPm3CWvDmvc

Well, you know. You seem to know how I vote and all.

Moose Malloy spotted @ 1:53

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfv6VmW7Io0

We loathe the TSA, we foam with rage over the NSA...yet, somehow, we seem to think that these were put in place by Obama, and it's his fault that they exist.

And yet, every time you claim this you seem to magically be incapable of seeing all the posts where people claim they hated Bush.

Also no one here has ever claimed the policies were created by Obama, we just recall he ran on a platform of rolling back the federal rape of civil liberties and reneged on that promise in under a minute

Hey, you know that position, luj...

The guy who continues a policy is completely blameless, next to the guy who started it. So we can ignore the guy in office today. He has absolutely no duty to the Constitution.