Ron Paul On How Far We've Fallen
Ron Paul writes:
Warfare/Welfare State Requires Police ControlAs the size of government grew and cracks in the system became readily apparent, a federal police force was needed to regulate our lives and the economy, as well as to protect us from ourselves and make sure the redistribution of a shrinking economic pie was "fair" to all. Central economic planning requires an economic police force to monitor every transaction of all Americans. Special interests were quick to get governments to regulate everything we put in our bodies: food, medications, and even politically correct ideas. IRS employees soon needed to carry guns to maximize revenue collections.
The global commitment to perpetual war, though present for decades, exploded in size and scope after 9/11. If there weren't enough economic reasons to monitor everything we did, fanatics used the excuse of national security to condition the American people to accept total surveillance of all by the NSA, the TSA, FISA courts, the CIA, and the FBI. The people even became sympathetic to our government's policy of torture.
To keep the people obedient to statism that originated at the federal level of government, control of education was required. It is now recognized that central control of education has actually ruined education, while costs have skyrocketed. National control of medical care has brought a similar result. This has meant more money for bureaucrats, as well as drug, insurance, and health management companies, and less money for medical care. Constantly more police are required to run our lives at greater costs while providing less benefit. "Nationalizing" both medical care and education has provided a great incentive to increase the policing powers of the federal government.
The predictable poverty that results from such a terrible system is now upon us and is a strong motivation for the militarization of local police as part of the expansion of the national police state. Temporary and perceived benefits of government overreach and expanded policing powers end up becoming the real problem. By the time it is understood that these "benefits" are artificial, government power and special interests have gained control of a system designed to serve them and not the people the programs were purported to help.
...Before we can actually restore our liberties, we most likely will have to become a lot less free and much poorer. This is sad since correct and workable answers are available to us if only the people understood them and demanded liberty and honesty, rather than being dependent on excessive government power and believing the false promises of politicians.







Ron Paul's essay expands Claire Wolfe's quip,""America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
I wonder; Is there any place left on Earth where liberty is ascendant, or at least stable? Where do they make it a priority?
Canvasback at January 11, 2015 7:43 AM
The really sad thing is, I suspect the "shoot the bastards" phase will be something we're going to see, and relatively soon. . .
Keith Glass at January 11, 2015 1:37 PM
To this end, do not support the idea of a "cashless society", which will be promoted by lots of people claiming all illegal trade happens with cash.
Why?
Because a computer system, against which you will have no redress, can be used to determine what you may or may not buy. Foods, vehicles, ammunition... all subject to the approval of an invisible entity.
Radwaste at January 11, 2015 2:27 PM
Foods, vehicles, ammunition... all subject to the approval of an invisible entity.
Double plus good, comrade!
Actually, I'm surprised something like that wasn't worked into ObamaCare. Let's face it: once the government is "responsible" for your health care, everything you do becomes "regulatable".
I R A Darth Aggie at January 12, 2015 9:49 AM
"Because a computer system, against which you will have no redress, can be used to determine what you may or may not buy. "
It will also determine how much money you have. Regardless of what your Quicken balance says.
Cousin Dave at January 12, 2015 12:59 PM
War is coming to the Union in the next few generations. There are to many people who are polar opposites now. It's a shame there isn't a legal way to leave the union-say, a certain percentage of the citizens vote for it. I doubt Texas will be flying the US flag when my (as yet far unborn or even thought of) grandkids are grown.
Hubby and I have gone almost all cash, now. I love it, budgeting wise. And bonus, less of a paper trail on me.
A few years ago a UT grad got busted by the DEA, he had a very sophisticated website for ordering drugs. And took credit cards. It was an impressive, and cashless, enterprise. Which I have finally come around to deciding should be completely legal. I get more libertarian every month that goes by.
momof4 at January 12, 2015 4:39 PM
Leave a comment