Princeton Group Rises Up Against Politically Correct Intimidation On Campus
Posted at NRO: "The Princeton Open Campus Coalition is a student group at Princeton University formed to push back against the recent wave of politically correct suppression of open academic discourse on campus."
Here's an excerpt from their letter to Princeton President Eisgruber:
We oppose efforts to purge (and literally paint over) recognitions of President Woodrow Wilson's achievements, including Wilson College, the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, and his mural in Wilcox Dining Hall. As you have noted, Wilson, like all other historical figures, has a mixed legacy. It is not for his contemptible racism, but for his contributions as president of both Princeton and the United States that we honor Wilson. Moreover, if we cease honoring flawed individuals, there will be no names adorning our buildings, no statues decorating our courtyards, and no biographies capable of inspiring future generations.We worry that the proposed distribution requirement will contribute to the politicization of the university and facilitate groupthink. However, we, too, are concerned about diversity in the classroom and offer our own solution to this problem. While we do not wish to impose additional distribution requirements on students for fear of stifling academic exploration, we believe that all students should be encouraged to take courses taught by professors who will challenge their preconceived mindsets. To this end, the university should make every effort to attract outstanding faculty representing a wider range of viewpoints -- even controversial viewpoints -- across all departments. Princeton needs more Peter Singers, more Cornel Wests, and more Robert Georges.
Similarly, we believe that requiring cultural competency training for faculty threatens to impose orthodoxies on issues about which people of good faith often disagree. As Professor Sergiu Klainerman has observed, it reeks of the reeducation programs to which people in his native Romania were subjected under Communist rule.
We firmly believe that there should be no space at a university in which any member of the community, student or faculty, is "safe" from having his or her most cherished and even identity-forming values challenged. It is the very mission of the university to seek truth by subjecting all beliefs to critical, rational scrutiny. While students with a shared interest in studying certain cultures are certainly welcome to live together, we reject university-sponsored separatism in housing. We are all members of the Princeton community. We denounce the notion that our basic interactions with each other should be defined by demographic traits.







This intelligent letter heartens me. Perhaps there is hope for American Higher Learning.
Michael Dickson at November 25, 2015 8:11 AM
Princeton needs more Peter Singers, more Cornel Wests, and more Robert Georges.
Interesting...all reliable leftists. Maybe you should, oh, I dunno, think outside the box?
That said, I'm sure the twitter rage mob will be along to hound the signatories into the gulag, or at least apologize for this massive microaggression against People of Color. And then into the gulag.
But Princeton should examine Wilson's vile racism, along with that embedded in FDR's governance. Places that had been desegregated were segregated under policies put in place by icons of the Progressive movement.
I R A Darth Aggie at November 25, 2015 10:48 AM
"Interesting...all reliable leftists."
And they're coming to take for-profit Jesus away and replace him with feed-the-poor Jesus.
So watch out!
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at November 25, 2015 12:16 PM
You mean, take away individual choice Jesus and replace him with government coercion Jesus.
'cause charity is always better if it's provided by a large faceless entity and funded through forced extortion of the fruits of people's labor instead of waiting for people to give to the poor of their own volition.
'cause feed the poor Jesus told folks to use Caesar's legions to rob the working people and give their money to the poor, not for people to voluntarily sell all their belongings and give the money to the poor. He understood that true charity consists of giving away someone else's money at gunpoint.
Conan the Grammarian at November 25, 2015 7:35 PM
Leave a comment