The Olympic Power Of Genes
You want me on your NBA team. You really do. Because diversity is good, right? And it would be a nice change of pace to have not only a woman but an Ashkenazi Jew who ducks any time a ball bigger than a tennis ball comes at her. (Admittedly, I don't flinch at beachballs.)
The truth is, even WNBA teams and the US national women's basketball team are mostly black.
People find it racist to talk about how genes -- to a vast extent -- make us who we are. They react to our environment, but again, you don't see a whole lot of Ashkenazi Jews out there on the basketball court. And that would probably be true even if Schlomo grew up next door to Magic Johnson (or any other big player -- and please forgive my lack of current references; Gregg is asleep).
Jon Etine writes at Genetic Literacy Project about how whites and Asians lag as sprinters and how Kenyans dominate in the distance races:
Usain Bolt, gold medal winner in Beijing and London and the only sprinter to post two times under 9.70 at the Olympics, is the odds-on favorite. Bolt has won every major 100M gold medal since he started running the event in 2008. But the fleetster, aging by international sprinting standards, will have some tough competition in long-time rival Justin Gatlin and Jamaica's Yohan Blake, who is a training partner of Bolt's.One thing that will be clear as the runner's toe the start line for the final on August 15: this is not an event for Asians, Caucasians or any other racial group other than athletes who trace their ancestry to West Africa. And if there is anything we can be sure, the athletes that make the finals won't always be the hardest working or the best coached. At the most elite level, the victory is contested by only those with the best genes-and that's determined by tens of thousands of years of evolutionary selection.
Those who do not understand the power of genes might argue that the medal podium for runners should reflect a rainbow of diversity, as no country or region should have a lock on desire or opportunity. But just the opposite has happened in track and field: running has become almost segregated by ancestry.
Here's the (un-PC) deal:
Certainly scientists do not subscribe to the blank slate theory that all human populations are born with an equal chance in to succeed in athletics or cognitive-weighted activities. Evolution has shaped differences.Bengt Saltin, who recently passed away as the director of the Copenhagen Muscle Research Institute, said his research suggested that an athlete's "environment" accounts for no more than 25 percent of athletic ability. The rest comes down to the roll of the genetic dice--with each population group--that's the technical term for the term "race" which carries disturbing associations-- having distinct advantages. In other words, running success is "in the genes."
Here are the facts. Genetically linked, highly heritable characteristics such as skeletal structure, the distribution of muscle fiber types (for example, sprinters have more natural fast-twitch fibers, while distance runners are naturally endowed with more of the slow-twitch variety), reflex capabilities, metabolic efficiency, and lung capacity are not evenly distributed among populations.
More:
Over the past decade, human genome research has moved from a study of human similarities to a focus on patterned based differences. Such research offers clues to solving the mystery of diseases, the Holy Grail of genetics.So why do we readily accept that evolution has turned out Jews with a genetic predisposition to Tay-Sachs, Southeast Asians with a higher proclivity for beta-thalassemia, and blacks who are susceptible to colorectal cancer and sickle-cell disease, yet find it inappropriate to suggest that Usain Bolt can thank his West African ancestry for the most critical part of his success?
Human "populations"--cohorts of people with shared genes--exist. But how important differences based on ancestral characteristics remain a controversial subject. The difficulty is sorting out how much of a trait is genetically inbred, how much may be shaped by environmental factors, and what is just plain supposition, sometimes sprinkled with biases.
Ultimately:
"Evolution has shaped body types and in part athletic possibilities," Joseph Graves, Jr. told me. Graves, an African American, is an Associate Dean for Research and Professor at the Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro, and an expert in the field of human differences. "Don't expect an Eskimo to show up on an NBA court or a Watusi to win the world weightlifting championship. Differences don't necessarily correlate with skin color, but rather with geography and climate. Endurance runners are more likely to come from East Africa and sprinters from West Africa. That's a fact. Genes play a major role in this."There's no need to make consideration of race in sports a taboo. In fact, sports provide the most rigid laboratory control possible--the level playing field--to guide us through the thicket of ideological correctness.
Entine has a book out on this subject -- Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We Are Afraid to Talk About It.
via @SteveStuWill







Wouldn't be good for the team, but I'd still pay to see you play at least one NBA game.
Brad at August 10, 2016 7:43 AM
My high school track team reflected this.
The distance runners were mostly white and the sprinters were mostly black.
Katrina at August 10, 2016 7:47 AM
And the reason that college degrees have been watered down into reguritated pap is not because there are not smart academically inclined minorities out there, but because there arent enough of them to feed the gargantuan diversity machine and the college loan scam.
Isab at August 10, 2016 8:00 AM
Exactly what Isab said. I have my differences with her over how much influence genetics have vs. environment and culture for large populations. But if you look at the best of the best there is an obvious genetic trend. And if you look at higher education there just aren't enough desired minorities that can make the grades.
The good news is most of us don't have to be the best of the best. I may be 10 seconds slower at the 800 meter race than the next guy. Since neither of us are in the Olympics it really doesn't matter.
And as for Kenyan runners, if I recall correctly it isn't all Kenyans. The best long distance runners come from 2-3 small villages.
Ben at August 10, 2016 8:45 AM
The good news is most of us don't have to be the best of the best. I may be 10 seconds slower at the 800 meter race than the next guy. Since neither of us are in the Olympics it really doesn't matter.
And as for Kenyan runners, if I recall correctly it isn't all Kenyans. The best long distance runners come from 2-3 small villages.
Ben at August 10, 2016 8:45 AM
Which, if I recall correctly are high altitude villages giving them a blood and lung capacity advantage over Kenyans from lower elevations.
Isab at August 10, 2016 8:55 AM
1) Diversity may only be mentioned as a positive.
2) Diversity may not be mentioned when it produces real differences in capability.
The NFL is 70% black, with actual aptitude tests.
Duke Power lost a lawsuit regarding aptitude tests because blacks could not score on it as high as others, despite the deadly consequences of being wrong in the field.
Per Fred Reed: "It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, should dominate national politics. Yet they do. Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can’t do. Their power seems without limit."
Radwaste at August 10, 2016 9:16 AM
Genetic differences in ability do exist. But it seems silly to attribute pro sports' demographics to some races being genetically superior, when those demographics are well explained by the fact that poor people depend more on scholarships to go to college.
jdgalt at August 10, 2016 10:03 AM
Cool explanation: "poor people depend more on scholarships to go to college."
How great that there aren't really any poor white people.
Amy Alkon at August 10, 2016 10:08 AM
Radwaste, thanks for the link to the Fred Reed piece.
Good Lord willing, the Age of Obama has but a few months remaining. Its sunset will only -- and only temporarily -- curtail some of the excesses of the Left's use of race as a vehicle for Marxist tyranny, but that's worth at least something.
Lastango at August 10, 2016 10:10 AM
Soccer seems to me an odd holdout from the pattern. The game requires more running than any other team sport I can think of, yet the best players in the world continue to be overwhelmingly people whose ancestors were clearly living in Europe in 1491, even as many Africans & people of African descent play it. Also interesting how East Africans countries struggle at it. The last African Cup of Nations final featured 2 West African countries, while Egypt can & has won it.
Blake at August 10, 2016 10:41 AM
I may be 10 seconds slower at the 800 meter race than the next guy. Since neither of us are in the Olympics it really doesn't matter.
All I know is if you're 10 seconds slower than me and we're being chased by an hungry grizzly or Kodiak brown it was nice knowing you.
Tho, in hindsight, it appears that Howard Cosell was hardest hit by this thread.
I R A Darth Aggie at August 10, 2016 10:46 AM
Soccer seems to me an odd holdout from the pattern. The game requires more running than any other team sport.
It is the nature of the game. Lots of jogging/trotting followed by all-out sprints, then back to jogging/trotting. If the West Africans are better at sprinting, that maybe why they have a leg up on their eastern neighbors.
And soccer is more than just running: lots of skills that can be learned, and honed by practice. Being fast is good. Knowing were you need to be before hand is better. Both is best of all.
I R A Darth Aggie at August 10, 2016 10:55 AM
I watched the women's 1500 meter US trials. All white, all about 5 ft 6, all thin. It looked like someone had cloned them.
There are also cultural aspects for certain sports. Blacks have no interest in hockey, there is a group aversion to swimming and sailing is economically ruled out for poor groups.
Also, notice the men's freestyle relay last night when the US won: the 4 guys (like Phelps) have a weird physique: very long torso, short legs. Phelps has the longest torso proportions I have ever seen. Great for swimming.
Craig Loehle at August 10, 2016 11:27 AM
Yes, it's true: White people can't jump.
mpetrie98 at August 10, 2016 12:15 PM
While it isn't limited to one geographic area it is quite clear that those who live to be the oldest 0.1% it is entirely due to genetics. Many of those people have lifestyles that would kill most of us by 50. But they keep going and going. One example I heard of passed 100. He smoked a pack a day, ate a grilled pound of fat each day (yes, literal pound), and drank mostly homemade moonshine. Most of us can't do that.
Ben at August 10, 2016 1:08 PM
" But it seems silly to attribute pro sports' demographics to some races being genetically superior, when those demographics are well explained by the fact that poor people depend more on scholarships to go to college."
Doesn't explain baseball, where going to college isn't mandatory, and most of the best players are signed out of high school. There's been an interesting shift in baseball's player demographics in the last 20 or so years. The number of black players has declined (leading to Joe Morgan's famous rant about how some white players should be banned to create more "slots" for blacks"), but the number of white players has risen only a little. Most of the slack has been taken up by Hispanic players, particularly those from the Caribbean. (And it's also kind of interesting how Hispanic players from the Caribbean, particularly the Dominican Republic, have been wildly successful in baseball, while Mexican players by and large have not.)
Auto racing is nearly all white (and male). But the driver who is absolutely dominating Formula 1 at the moment is black. What does one make of that?
Cousin Dave at August 10, 2016 1:43 PM
"What does one make of that?"
The color of your skin is a really crappy way to measure genetics.
While it is more likely people with darker skin will have the sickle cell gene some people of pallor do have it. But the optical test has one great advantage, it is cheap. Looking at your skin is not terribly effective but very very cheap.
As for basketball, I don't really buy all the black/white stuff. It is a huge advantage to be tall. Look at Yao Ming. He may be Asian but he is also 7 1/2 ft tall. You don't see any 4 ft tall people in the NBA no matter the color of their skin. Same thing with Phelps and other tops swimmers as Craig mentioned. There is a specific body shape that gives a great advantage at that activity. You also won't find many 6 ft tall coal miners. As I mentioned with the runners. It isn't enough to be black. It isn't enough to be Kenyan. You have to be from a very specific area. Black and Kenyan are only proxies for the actual genetic ancestry. Once again, we use them because they are a lot cheaper than running a gene analysis and figuring out exactly what sequences make their accomplishments possible.
Ben at August 10, 2016 3:23 PM
So...
You have strong opinions about Muslims, and your certainty about them is terribly powerfully, almost a burden to you... But you've never actually spoken to any.
And now it turns out that there are all these people on here who have very about the meaning of race, especially for black people...
But there are no black people commenting here, either.
Every now and then this blog betrays its readership and the caliber of their insights.
Crid at August 10, 2016 5:01 PM
"He smoked a pack a day, ate a grilled pound of fat each day (yes, literal pound), and drank mostly homemade moonshine. Most of us can't do that"
But we can dream. What a wonderful dream that would be. It could be even better with two packs a day.....aaaahhhhh.
causticf at August 10, 2016 5:03 PM
"And now it turns out that there are all these people on here who have very about the meaning of race, especially for black people...
But there are no black people commenting here, either.
Every now and then this blog betrays its readership and the caliber of their insights."
Lmao I love you Crid. BUUUURNNN. Great insight.
It reminds me how often multiple people on here try to tell me, a several generations Mexican-American, the dangers of MECHA. This is the frustration black ppl must feel when people constantly bring up Jesse Jackson.
Ppen at August 10, 2016 11:34 PM
Strong feelings slipped offa my keyboard between very and about, but it seemed likely everyone would know what was intended.
Crid at August 11, 2016 12:48 AM
What else are we supposed to ignore to spare someone's feelings?
Obviously most Muslims aren't terrorists, and most Blacks aren't thugs. Unfortunately, the latter are overrepresented among the former, and lacking any other information, reasonable people will draw conclusions from what they know.
MarkD at August 11, 2016 8:00 AM
Whaddya mean we, Paleface?
Crid at August 11, 2016 10:30 AM
Ok Ppen, what the hell is MECHA? I'm assuming you aren't talking about giant robots piloted by cute scantily clad girls.
Ben at August 11, 2016 12:08 PM
I don't know what the fuck MECHA is, and my last name's Sanchez.
momof4 at August 11, 2016 7:43 PM
It reminds me how often multiple people on here try to tell me, a several generations Mexican-American, the dangers of MECHA.
Yep. I notice it when non-scientists here assert that women cannot possibly be good scientists because their spatial skills aren't as strong as those of men.
The problem is not that there aren't racial and gender differences it's that everyone suddenly becomes so reductive. It's like no one has ever heard of a standard deviation.
Astra at August 12, 2016 9:38 AM
> The problem is not that there aren't
> racial and gender differences it's
> that everyone suddenly becomes so
> reductive. It's like no one has ever
> heard of a standard deviation.
☑ ☑ ☑
Crid at August 12, 2016 10:09 PM
Leave a comment