Europe Has Imported Its Own Death Squads
Stoyan Zaimov writes at Christian Post of a Muslim man, the 16-year-old son of Imam Sheikh Alami, a local radical cleric with Dutch and Moroccan citizenship, who had voiced some nice gentle thoughts while he marched around Verviers, Belgium:
"Allah, kill the despicable Christians. Allah, kill each and every last one of them," the Muslim man is heard chanting as he walked down the main street of Verviers.
In Strasbourg, France, a rabbi was just knifed by man shouting Allahu Akbar.
By the way, that doesn't mean "god is great," but "god is greater," as in Allah is greater than your god.
Islam is nothing if not supremacist.
This is instructive from Bill Warner:
Let's examine the ethical basis of our civilization. All of our politics and ethics are based upon a unitary ethic that is best formulated in the Golden Rule:
Treat others as you would be treated.
The basis of this rule is the recognition that at one level, we are all the same. We are not all equal. Any game of sports will show that we do not have equal abilities. But everyone wants to be treated as a human being. In particular, we all want to be equal under the law and be treated as social equals. On the basis of the Golden Rule--the equality of human beings--we have created democracy, ended slavery and treat women and men as political equals. So the Golden Rule is a unitary ethic. All people are to be treated the same. All religions have some version of the Golden Rule except Islam.
FP: So how is Islam different in this context?
Warner: The term "human being" has no meaning inside of Islam. There is no such thing as humanity, only the duality of the believer and unbeliever. Look at the ethical statements found in the Hadith. A Muslim should not lie, cheat, kill or steal from other Muslims. But a Muslim may lie, deceive or kill an unbeliever if it advances Islam. There is no such thing as a universal statement of ethics in Islam. Muslims are to be treated one way and unbelievers another way. The closest Islam comes to a universal statement of ethics is that the entire world must submit to Islam. After Mohammed became a prophet, he never treated an unbeliever the same as a Muslim. Islam denies the truth of the Golden Rule.
By the way, this dualistic ethic is the basis for jihad. The ethical system sets up the unbeliever as less than human and therefore, it is easy to kill, harm or deceive the unbeliever.
Now mind you, unbelievers have frequently failed at applying the Golden Rule, but we can be judged and condemned on its basis. We do fall short, but it is our ideal.
There have been other dualistic cultures. The KKK comes to mind. But the KKK is a simplistic dualism. The KKK member hates all black people at all times; there is only one choice. This is very straightforward and easy to see.
The dualism of Islam is more deceitful and offers two choices on how to treat the unbeliever. The unbeliever can be treated nicely, in the same way a farmer treats his cattle well. So Islam can be "nice", but in no case is the unbeliever a "brother" or a friend. In fact, there are some 14 verses of the Koran that are emphatic--a Muslim is never a friend to the unbeliever. A Muslim may be "friendly," but he is never an actual friend. And the degree to which a Muslim is actually a true friend is the degree to which he is not a Muslim, but a hypocrite.
He winds up with this:
FP: So summarize for us why it is so crucial for us to learn the doctrine of political Islam.
Warner: Political Islam has annihilated every culture it has invaded or immigrated to. The total time for annihilation takes centuries, but once Islam is ascendant it never fails. The host culture disappears and becomes extinct.
We must learn the doctrine of political Islam to survive. The doctrine is very clear that all forms of force and persuasion may and must be used to conquer us. Islam is a self-declared enemy of all unbelievers. The brilliant Chinese philosopher of war, Sun Tsu, had the dictum--know the enemy. We must know the doctrine of our enemy or be annihilated.
I have a couple of Warner's books, The Simple Koran and the Abridged Koran, which cuts out a lot of the needless and boring repetition in the Simple Koran. Both are arranged in chronological order, which makes them much more understandable. Some Turkish idiot at some point way back when had apparently rearranged the Quran according to the length of chapters. Genius!
Having them in chronological order makes far more sense. And save your brain waves and your sanity. Read the shorty. It does the job.
Oh, and here's Bill Warner on Islamic totalitarianism:
$hillary, wants to make this happen here. You should vote for her.
Matt at August 20, 2016 12:54 AM
I hate Hillary, but, as I keep saying, she's the corrupt adult in the picture.
And sorry, but Trump never met an issue he didn't take the opposite side of his first position on, sometimes days or weeks later.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/09/trump_flipflops_on_crucial_issue_of_importing_muslim_refugees.html
Amy Alkon at August 20, 2016 5:49 AM
More:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/435317/donald-trumps-muslim-ban-backtrack
Amy Alkon at August 20, 2016 5:50 AM
Amy, there is no "adult" in Clinton and you should pick another reason for voting for her. There is selfish and political but no soul. Name an issue where she has not backtracked for obvious political reasons. Give this "reason" a quiet funeral please.
The culture you describe fits BLM, SJW, and many others. Civilization can not move forward unless people are willing to expand their thoughts to include others that might disagree with them but are still decent human beings.
Bob in Texas at August 20, 2016 5:58 AM
"Amy, there is no "adult" in Clinton and you should pick another reason for voting for her. There is selfish and political but no soul. Name an issue where she has not backtracked for obvious political reasons. Give this "reason" a quiet funeral please."
Bob, you might as well give up. Amy's cognitive dissonance is overwhelming on this issue. She couldn't find any agreement with Hillary on the issues so she latched onto the "adult" trope as the only excuse left to still be in agreement with her lefty journalist friends.
There isn't any analysis going on here which is why she keeps repeating this *adult* bullshit.
Isab at August 20, 2016 6:30 AM
First, which KKK? There have been three distinct incarnations of the Klan. Second, simple dualism? No. The KKK opposes blacks, communists, Jews, Catholics, Arabs, Asians, and Southern Europeans - all within a context of American residence and citizenship. The Klan's Aryan ideal has only Northern European Protestant roots.
One of Jesus' most radical parables was the Good Samaritan. Ancient Judaism had the same believer vs. non-believer mentality of current Islam (maybe it's the desert air). The idea that a Samaritan, an outsider and non-Jew, could be a good person was revolutionary thinking for that era.
If you've ever seen the Canadian sitcom, Corner Gas, every time a townsperson in the show mentioned the nearby and rival town of Wullerton (ptooey), they had to spit. Parks and Recreation carried this same small-town rivalry theme with that show's rival town of Eagleton. This was the ancient Jews' attitude toward non-Jews (ptooey).
Conan the Grammarian at August 20, 2016 6:32 AM
"One of Jesus' most radical parables was the Good Samaritan. Ancient Judaism had the same believer vs. non-believer mentality of current Islam (maybe it's the desert air)."
It is human nature as expressed in tribalist culture. We are good. Everyone different is bad and scary.
It reinforces cultural cohesiveness.
Even modern cultures do it, they just frame the other in different terms like,* adult* verses immature, sane vs crazy. Or racist bigot vs. educated cosmopolitan.
Isab at August 20, 2016 6:55 AM
"I hate Hillary, but, as I keep saying, she's the corrupt adult in the picture."
A corrupt adult who does not share your point of view on this subject. Yeah, you should totally vote for her.
Matt at August 20, 2016 7:54 AM
Because Hillary never flips.
https://www.rt.com/usa/318453-hilary-clinton-flip-flops/
momof4 at August 20, 2016 8:37 AM
Bill and Hillary together are worth $100,000,000. So, how did two people working in public service and receiving a government salary increase their net worth to $100,000,000 ?
Nick at August 20, 2016 9:30 AM
Didn't they leave the White House "dead broke?"
Conan the Grammarian at August 20, 2016 10:27 AM
This explains how the Clintons' got rich and I agree w/Amy in that it takes an "adult" to come up w/this stuff.
(BTW, the "us vs. them" attitude is the only way to explain voting for Clinton. Logic and reason need not apply because it interferes w/identity.)
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/437883/hillarys-america-secret-history-democratic-party-dinesh-dsouza-clinton-foundation
Bob in Texas at August 20, 2016 1:41 PM
You're fixating on "adult" and ignoring "corrupt." You need to spend some time thinking about the "corrupt" part and what that could mean for the country.
What will electing this woman to the presidency do for the country? As Secretary of State, she sold influence and access to multinational corporations, foreign powers, and international players. Just think what she'll sell as president.
Conan the Grammarian at August 20, 2016 2:40 PM
My response to Amy: If Hillary is elected, that firmly cements the leftist-cronyist machine's control of America. Authoritarian command-and-control, by the ruling class, will become permanent. There won't be any more meaningful elections; you won't be able to vote for any candidate who isn't part of the machine. And anyway, through its control of the executive and judicial branches, the machine will render the legislature pretty much meaningless.
If Trump is elected, America gets a mulligan. There will be enough confusion and conflict among the cronies and power blocs that authoritarianism won't be able to advance very much. And Trump's government might accidentally implement a few policies that are actually good for the country, like the immigration restrictions being debated. Hopefully, over the next four years, the leadership of both parties is purged and the nominating processes produce better candidates from both parties next time.
Cousin Dave at August 22, 2016 8:17 AM
If Trump is elected, America gets a mulligan. There will be enough confusion and conflict among the cronies and power blocs that authoritarianism won't be able to advance very much. And Trump's government might accidentally implement a few policies that are actually good for the country, like the immigration restrictions being debated. Hopefully, over the next four years, the leadership of both parties is purged and the nominating processes produce better candidates from both parties next time.
This. Also, Hillary is liked/feared by enough people to actually accomplish her goals, where Trump is not, and so he will simply spin his wheels with Congress and not get anything done. He will do far less damage than Hillary.
Kat at August 22, 2016 1:38 PM
Leave a comment