The Federal Government Is Prescribing Daily Torture For People In Pain
Powerful piece by Dennis Prager at NRO on his stepson, in terrible chronic pain after a fall, who ended up killing himself when he couldn't get the painkillers he needed to ease his suffering:
In retrospect, it's unfortunate that he awoke from that coma, because for all intents and purposes, his life ended with that fall. Not because his mind was affected; his mind was completely intact until the moment he took his life. His life ended because, while modern medicine was adept enough to keep him alive, it was unable or unwilling to help him deal with the excruciating pain that he experienced over the next two years. And life in constant, excruciating pain, with no hope of ever alleviating it, is not worth living.As a result of the surgery, Bruce developed abdominal scar-tissue structures known as adhesions. Adhesions can be horribly painful, but they are difficult to diagnose because they don't appear in imaging, and no surgery in America or in Mexico, where out of desperation he also sought treatment, could remove them permanently. Many doctors dismiss adhesions, regarding the patient's pain as psychosomatic.
The pain prevented him from getting adequate sleep. Nor could he eat without causing the pain to spike for hours. By the time of his death, he had lost almost half his body weight
Prescription painkillers -- opioids -- relieved much of his pain, or at least kept it to a tolerable level. But after the initial recuperation period, no doctor would prescribe an opioid despite the fact that this man had a well-documented injury and no record of addiction to any drug, including opioids. Doctors either wouldn't prescribe them on an ongoing basis, because they feared losing their medical license or being held legally liable for addiction or overdose, or because they deemed Bruce a hypochondriac.
The federal government and states such as California have made it extremely difficult for physicians to prescribe painkillers for an extended period of time. The medical establishment and government bureaucrats have decided that it is better to allow people to suffer terrible pain than to risk exposing them to the danger of opioid addiction.
They believe it is better to allow any number of innocent people to suffer hideous pain for the rest of their lives than to risk having any patient getting addicted and potentially dying from an overdose.
It should be the patient's choice to take that risk rather than live day in, day out, in suffering.
As for the need to prevent people from taking opiates for a buzz, people who really want them can probably get them anyway. (You can buy heroin and lots of other drugs about eight blocks from my house.)
Also, Reason drug policy reporter Jacob Sullum is a rare voice of reason on opioids. He writes:
Opioid-related deaths are rare even for patients who take narcotics every day for years. The CDC cites "a recent study of patients aged 15-64 years receiving opioids for chronic noncancer pain" who were followed for up to 13 years. The researchers found that "one in 550 patients died from opioid-related overdose," which is a risk of less than 0.2 percent.The risk of addiction also has been exaggerated. According to NSDUH, those 259 million painkiller prescriptions in 2012 resulted in about 2 million cases of "dependence or abuse," or one for every 130 prescriptions. A recent study by Castlight Health estimated that 4.5 percent of people who have received opioid prescriptions qualify as "abusers," and its definition, based on the amount prescribed and the number of prescribers, probably captures some legitimate patients as well.
...The truth is that using such drugs regularly for their psychoactive effects appeals to only a small minority of people, which is one reason heroin has never been very popular even among illegal drug users. "We lose sight of the fact that the prescription opioids are just as addictive as heroin," says CDC Director Thomas Frieden. In other words, not very.
Some of the legislative responses to the increase in opioid-related deaths, such as shielding people who report overdoses from criminal charges and making the opioid antagonist naloxone more widely available, are sensible. But the crackdown on painkiller prescriptions is bound to hurt bona fide patients while driving opioid users to black-market heroin, which is more dangerous because its potency is unpredictable--a hazard created by an earlier round of antidrug legislation.







That's pretty insensitive, suggesting that Bruce buy heroin in your neighborhood. Oh, wait, that's a totally different issue.
More on this in Time magazine...
Here's how this would go: one suffering from intractable pain starves to death and dies while under the influence because the drugs also turn off appetite. One has a pedestrian accident while under the influence. One has an overdose incident.
In court, all three are the fault of the drug company and the doctors, without whom such tragedies would never happen. They have deep pockets, and so being kind costs them their entire company.
No deal. Say what you will about government heartlessness and/or crackdowns, but when people smell money, nothing can continue.
Radwaste at January 31, 2017 9:23 PM
This is what happens when you turn the practice of medicine over to bureaucrats; this was the original argument against ObamaCare. On the flip side, there are enough Theodore Morells, George Nichopouloses, and Max Jacobsons in the world that turning the practice of medicine medicine over to individual doctors is also problematic.
Bureaucrats like one-size-fits-all solutions. If the patient presents with a headache, prescribe 100ml of Drug X one time only. Individual doctors are human and subject to human frailties and failures.
Unfortunately medicine is entirely individualistic. What works for one patient might not work for the next one hundred patients. Body chemistry, physiology, attitude, and emotional state can all play into the rehabilitation of a patient, and are dramatically different from patient to patient.
Some patients become addicted to opiates in small doses. Some need larger doses just to function. Dictating that every patient can only have X amount for X number of days dooms some patients to a life of chronic pain and others to a life of addiction.
While returning to the free-wheeling days when cocaine and LSD were regularly prescribed and bleeding with leeches was considered a valid cure is not the answer, locking medicine up in a rigid government bureaucracy (Palin's "death panels") is surely not the answer either.
Conan the Grammarian at February 1, 2017 6:39 AM
To riff on what Conan said, our entire structure for regulating opioid use goes back to the Victorian era, when morphine and heroin were sold over the counter, and the hazards were poorly understood. Nothing about the medical industry's or the government's approach to regulation has changed since then, despite the fact that we know how to manage the risks now, and the drugs themselves have fewer of the really bad side effects.
The medical industry does not take chronic pain seriously. Part of this is because a lot of doctors are afraid of the DEA; they seem to have an arbitrary cutoff of what constitutes "too many prescriptions" that ignores what mix of patients the doctor is seeing, or what their conditions are. A doctor who specializes in pain management is going to prescribe more than a GP, because of the nature of his practice, but that's too subtle a distinction for the DEA. When you're a hammer, etc.
But the other part of the problem is that a lot of doctors act like dealing with pain, and mental health issues in general, is beneath them. I saw this quote in an article recently from a pompous doctor: "The patient needs to be told to not focus on the pain, but on their emotional reaction to the pain. If they learn to manage their emotional reaction, then the pain will not be a problem." Doctor, let me stick you in the arm with a hot needle, repeatedly, and then you can tell me about how you are managing your emotional reaction. They are all about "we must prevent deaths from addiction", but they seem to care nothing about suicides due to lack of treatment.
I saw this phrase recently: "invisible graveyards". The reference was in this context: the fact that we can count fatalities caused by side effects of drugs that have been approved, but nobody makes an attempt to account for deaths that occur because regulators drag their feet on approving life-saving drugs. It applies here too. How big is the invisible graveyard filled with people who died from the effects of untreated chronic pain? Does anyone care?
Cousin Dave at February 1, 2017 7:06 AM
You can buy heroin and lots of other drugs about eight blocks from my house.
You have a bar around the corner, right? You can probably score some there. You'll just have to introduce yourself to the "undocumented pharmacist".
The other bureaucratic issue with such prescriptions is the artificial limits on the amounts of drug to be produced, as you have found with your ADHD drug.
https://www.dea.gov/divisions/hq/2016/hq100416.shtml
I R A Darth Aggie at February 1, 2017 7:50 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2017/02/01/the_federal_gov_2.html#comment-6583038">comment from Cousin DaveI suspect that fear is more a part of it, but this is pretty disgusting:
"But the other part of the problem is that a lot of doctors act like dealing with pain, and mental health issues in general, is beneath them."
We put dogs to sleep when they are suffering, but claim to value human life above all else while sentencing people to live day to day in horrible pain.
Amy Alkon
at February 1, 2017 8:02 AM
I'm lucky -- I don't have cancer or crippling pain. I'm very thankful for that. I do have chronic pain though due to three different back conditions and arthritic hips.
Originally I was put on Vicodin. It worked, but not well. Many days it barely touched the pain, and due to the Tylenol in it, I couldn't increase dosage to deal effectively with the pain levels on bad days. On top of this, Vidocin caused constipation (which was quite severe with me), nausea, dizziness, and slow digestion (which I have issues with already due to neuropathy). Vicodin reduced my activity levels as well.
A new doctor prescribed Hydromorphone for me. It was as different as night and day. The side effects are mild, so much so I rarely notice them. The effectiveness for dealing with pain meant I was often able to only use one tablet, or even half a tablet, per day. My activity increased as pain was controlled well. I was very satisfied and happy with the results.
Then the war on pain meds started. I had to jump through more hoops to get Hydromorphe despite not increasing the amount I needed per month and never having an issue with any substance addiction. My doctor, another new one as the last I lost due to Obamacare, Started pushing me to go back to Vicodin. Almost every time I see him he does this. Between the fear mongering over opiates and Kaiser pushing solutions that don't work well, I fear it won't be long before they refuse to prescribe Hydromorphone for me.
I have degenerative conditions that won't get better, only worse. This war on opiates concerns me greatly as this will be torture for me and many others if they're banned, or greatly reduced in use.
PS Does anyone find it coincidental that, as marijuana becomes more acceptable and legal, that dryg enforcement is eyeing opiates now? Perhaps job security is driving this as much as their lust for control.
Mythspeak at February 1, 2017 8:10 AM
Recently my 26 year old niece was having some health issues...lingering cold, and bronchitis. She couldn't shake it no matter what, so she went back to the doctor who decided to perform a chest x-ray to see if the bronchitis was in fact pneumonia. Well it turns out that she had a large sarcoma taking up nearly the entire left lung, and was pressing on the aorta. Within 2 weeks of this discovery she had surgery to remove the sarcoma, which necessitated the removal of her entire left lung, and then repairs to the aorta and the left side of her heart. When she got out of the hospital, she left without any pain meds...none, whatsoever. A week later, at a follow-up appointment, they still refused to give her any pain meds. My SIL literally had to beg several doctors before finding one with a brain who prescribe the meds to my niece. WTF is wrong with doctors and hospitals that they're unable, or unwilling to look at an individual and say "Oh shit, you had your chest cracked opened, had a lung removed, yeah you're probably in some serious pain."
sara at February 1, 2017 9:28 AM
On the whole intractable pain issue -- there is considerable material noting that surgery often produces numbness.
I suggest that people ask loudly before surgeries if continuing pain will be the result, and whether a surgical solution can be found.
You can't be loud enough asking about medical treatment. Even minor things can develop into permanent problems.
Radwaste at February 1, 2017 10:01 AM
Well, then...
“One thing that’s always disturbed me: they come up with a new drug for a patient who’s terminal, and the FDA says we can’t … approve the drug, because we don’t want to hurt the patient. But the patient is not going to live more than 4 weeks, [anyway]. So, we're going to be changing a lot of the rules.”
Time to be horrified. That was President Donald Trump saying that. You know, the non-adult.
Radwaste at February 1, 2017 10:24 AM
"You can buy heroin and lots of other drugs about eight blocks from my house."
Hell, Vancouver B. C. is giving away free heroin as a quality of life compassion program.
www.google.com/search?redir_esc=&client=ms-android-boost-us&hl=en-US&oe=utf-8&safe=images&q=vancouver+b.+b.+free+heroin&source=android-browser-type&qsubts=1485979692495
Canvasback at February 1, 2017 12:13 PM
I say we take off and nuke the DEA from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.
mpetrie98 at February 1, 2017 2:09 PM
Mythspeak, when my wife died, I had a bizarrely hard time getting rid of the prescription drugs - including tablets of Hydromorphone (Dilaudid). The nurses wouldn't take the drugs, etc. I eventually disposed of them in coffee grounds, but I know a lot of people hold on to them with no intention of using them. They just sit there, for months or years, unused. I thought it was a shame I couldn't give them to someone who needed them.
Sara, I'm sorry your niece (and your whole family) went through, is going through, this. My wife had lung cancer and I remember what the surgeon said about the pain levels that result from thoracic surgery (which my wife did not have).
Here's what I wish we had known:
tell the surgeon/ doctor/ nurses you do not want to leave the hospital without pain medications to use at home; and
before you leave with those medications, use them in the hospital in the same form and in the same concentration.
IV Dilaudid worked well for my wife, but Dilaudid in pill form did nothing for her. Sometimes changing the form of the drug is all is takes to render it useless for you.
(The days she spent at home in pain before we got that handled - those days changed me. I agreed to them when we married, but it is a horror I cannot describe - seriously, whatever it takes, make sure to get pain meds that you have verified work for *you*, before you leave the hospital.)
It can be hard to get the doctor who is on call to get on the phone, or to do more or differently than what your doctor ordered.
Heed Sara's example - do not count on reason and mercy to prevail just because the person you love is screaming in pain. Get what you need and be sure it works for you before you leave the hospital. Discuss contingency plans with your doctor and nurses before you leave the hospital. Write down the names of the drugs, the doctors, the nurses, before you leave the hospital - so if you need to call from home, you have a head start in facilitating the conversation.
Michelle at February 2, 2017 12:23 AM
Leave a comment