Mean Girls With A Tan
A woman who's white -- Joanne Cleaver -- writes in The Chicago Trib:
It's not a good sign when you discover that everybody in a diversity workshop thinks the same way.
The context:
I signed up for a one-month online workshop advertised as skill-building for white women who want to be "allies and advocates" for women of color. It's a hot topic right now, framed as "intersectionality" -- the idea that feminism needs to redefine itself around the experiences of women of color and whose experience is different from that of white, middle- and upper-class women. But as a middle-aged WASP woman, I'm not sure how to stand with and for women of color without speaking for them.
That makes me a little ill. I stand with human beings. Some are richer or poorer or sicker or better looking or missing a limb. I look at them as people. I can find something in common with pretty much most people, assuming they don't hate me in advance for my skin color or beliefs.
Cleaver apparently had no idea what she was getting into. She writes that before the workshop even got started, things got ugly, "setting a poisonous tone":
As the group got organized online, one member shared a screen grab from her Facebook feed, in which a stream of self-appointed diversity advocates pounced on a young woman who had shared her happiness about graduating from medical school.Almost immediately, someone minimized her accomplishment by attributing much of it to "white privilege." The new doctor struck back, pointing out that she'd climbed out of foster care and had worked her way through college.
But to the diversity Puritans, she had no right to celebrate what they labeled an ill-gotten accomplishment achieved in no small part by her white skin. Their glee in condemning her was exceeded only by their mutual congratulations for being so brave to bully her.
Inevitably, the entire mess went viral, sparking an opportunity for most of the workshop participants to pile on.
And the workshop leader was the worst of all, egging on members of the forming group to charge "privilege" toward every accomplishment of every white woman. She was bullying and encouraging bullying, and I said so.
Things went downhill from there.
Once again, I see that "diversity" is so often a passable way to grab for unearned power over others -- and to enjoy shaming them in the process, for something they have zero control over: the color of their skin and the circumstances of their birth.
Do you get the sense that the people professing to want to do something about racism really just want a turn at being the racists?







"Workshop" just sounds so darned evocative... I imagine all these wordworking tools, and little curls of shavings on the floor, and a scent like cedar in the air.
But this workshop would probably not be that enriching... Or that challenging, for that matter.
This Iowahawk tweet to mind comes to mind.
You weren't going to leave that "workshop" with a doorstop or a bootjack or anything useful.
Crid at December 21, 2017 12:37 AM
Do you get the sense that the people professing to want to do something about racism really just want a turn at being the racists?
Yes.
Fortunately, the people opposing sexism aren't like that at all.
dee nile at December 21, 2017 4:32 AM
Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.
C.S. Lewis
I was going to try to use that quote, but I'm not sure the participants in this workshop were either sincere or particularly concerned about the good of their victims. But I suspect lots of people would gleefully act like little shits if they knew they'd be praised for it.
Old RPM Daddy (OldRPMDaddy at GMail dot com) at December 21, 2017 4:56 AM
The assumption underlying all these calls for "intersectionality" and "diversity" seems to be that being white automatically equals being middle or upper middle class. Nowhere is it conceded that white people can be poverty-stricken, isolated, or disadvantaged. White people are assumed to have privilege, no matter their real socio-economic situation.
Conan the Grammarian at December 21, 2017 5:08 AM
Or a useful skill.
Reminds me of an anti-sexual harassment workshop I had to take when I worked for a bank. The HR person running it told us not to use "sports" terms like "the whole nine yards" because they might exclude women. When I explained to her that it was not a "sports" term, that in no known sport was nine yards a significant measure, she harrumphed and refused to call on me for the rest of the seminar.
I left the workshop with no better understanding of workplace discrimination, women's struggles, or anything for that matter. I'd lost a day of productive work and gained nothing.
Regarding the whole nine yards, the etymology is unclear. The phrase has a murky history and its origins are unknown. But it is not a sports phrase.
Conan the Grammarian at December 21, 2017 5:17 AM
Every orthodoxy requires "the infidel". When external ones aren't available, members will begin finding them among their fellows, and they will be weighed, measured, and found wanting. Seems to be an iron law.
bkmale at December 21, 2017 5:26 AM
Every group I've been involved with ever has done a lot of hang-wringing about how they can attract more POC.
Hiking group I was in was trying to get more WOC to come on hikes.
Undergrad college was trying to recruit WOC.
Grad school was trying to recruit students OC and was very upset there weren't enough professors OC.
First two jobs were desperately trying to get more POC.
Religious retreat I went to a few times wanted more POC too.
Apparently I am attracted to white-heavy places and activities.
At the risk of sounding like a horrible human being, sometimes this whole POC-recruiting business sounds like it is more about validation for the white people to prove how open minded they are than anything else. If the POC aren't interested, then maybe respect that. If you want to be around more POC, maybe go join the organizations run by THEM rather than wishing they would come to the ones run by YOU!
This doesn't always work... I found a religious org similar to ones I'd been involved with, but with a Black/African twist rather than a European one... they did not have nice things to say about White people. Which, frankly, is fair enough.
I dunno, it feels a bit... "Well we know there was the whole slavery thing, but let's let bygones be bygones and be best buddies, come join the organization I run or accept me in yours!" I mean, I don't blame them if they don't want to.
NicoleK at December 21, 2017 6:17 AM
"Do you get the sense that the people professing to want to do something about racism really just want a turn at being the racists?"
Yeah. David Horowitz told me: "We wanted our rights so we could use them to take away everyone else's rights."
At work, they make the civil servants take a sexual harassment training course. (Mercifully, us contractor scum are exempt.) The people who have been to it come back saying, "If you want to know how to sexually harass someone, they'll teach you how to do it!"
Cousin Dave at December 21, 2017 6:19 AM
"...they did not have nice things to say about White people. Which, frankly, is fair enough."
I have no sympathy. Like all the rest of the 20th-century civil rights movements, it has degenerated into special pleading: "We demand to be admitted everywhere that you go, but we also demand to have private places where you aren't welcome."
Cousin Dave at December 21, 2017 6:26 AM
NicoleK, I agree: "sometimes this whole POC-recruiting business sounds like it is more about validation for the white people to prove how open minded they are than anything else."
It's also treating them like icons or pets instead of people, on some level, and I find that icky.
My black friends are the same as my white friends: Smart, high-achieving, interesting thinkers who've done things with their lives. Fetishizing their skin color and treating them like learning disabled people who need a little extra help in life is racism that I want no part of.
Amy Alkon at December 21, 2017 6:42 AM
Eh, whatever. Segregation only ended a decade or so before I was born, it was in the lifetime of not just my parents but some of my cousins and the older end of my generation. So I get it. I don't take it personally.
NicoleK at December 21, 2017 6:46 AM
As I just tweeted (to someone who said his mom called this "reverse racism":
https://twitter.com/amyalkon/status/943847246486835203
Amy Alkon at December 21, 2017 6:51 AM
I remember laughing at the inability of white women to see to the logical conclusion 25 years ago when one who had been promoted just because of her sex turned to me and said, "Can you believe that they are now promoting black people for affirmative action? It's not enough anymore to just be a woman; that was how it's supposed to be; now they're giving blacks an advantage, and that's just not fair."
What did the polio charities do when there was a vaccine that basically ended it? Why, they discovered new causes! They did not declare victory and go home.
Now being the most pampered and privileged class in the world, feminists have to expropriate racial grievances and invent new victimhoods because living longer, being sexual libertines, getting useless college degrees, and enjoying early heart attacks just isn't enough for women. They got what they wanted; the worst possible curse you can have.
El Verde Loco at December 21, 2017 7:23 AM
Narcissism is everywhere.
All races, male and female.
Narcissism is sadly the norm.
Connie Johnson at December 21, 2017 7:59 AM
The writer reminds me of Communits during the Stalin era who clung to the faith in the face of his barbarities, even rationalizing their own arrests as being due to "mistaken identity". It also calls to mind the empty assurances of Ivanov, interrogator of Rubashov in Koestler's novel, "Darkness at Noon", when he tells the veteran Bolshevik Revolutionary Rubashov, falsely accused of betrying the revolution, that far in the future, when it can do no harm, the truth of Rubashov's innocence. Folks like the writer think that they are selflessly sacrificing themselves for a better world, and that they will be recognized for it some day. Delusional.
Dennis at December 21, 2017 9:34 AM
> Communits during the Stalin era
I say we affirm this spelling as acceptable.
Crid at December 21, 2017 10:33 AM
Looking forward to the time when we look back on "intersectionality" as a divisively archaic concept (and the author of the Tribune article mischaracterizes it here).
It's entirely possible to concentrate on one thing — feminism, conservatism, whateverism — without having to reflect on a million other -isms at the same time and try to figure out how they all reflect and refract on one another. In fact, it's probably more productive.
Kevin at December 21, 2017 10:59 AM
If you are at a disadvantage due to some group characteristic, how can you overcome it? You can work your ass off, study hard, stay married, dress sharp when you go out, save your money, like the Jews and Chinese and millions of immigrants. Where I live the hispanics are getting ahead rapidly by starting businesses in roofing, laying concrete, house painting, lawn care--note I did not say working for white people. They own their business and I've hired lots of them. You could look at white people to see what they do to get ahead (Hint, it doesn't involve yelling at people who are successful, it does involve working hard). This idea that whites have it all because they stole it is simply stupid. Who did I steal anything from by going to school? Furthermore, it is FAR from true that all white people make it. Check out the middle-aged white men at the stores around you--they are not all managers. Many are putting stuff on the shelves or driving trucks, not exactly high paying jobs.
I would also like to point out that every single group of people in the world has at one time been conquered and enslaved. Are we all going to hold grudges forever? The English were enslaving the Irish in the 1700s and the Irish were enslaving the English before that.
cc at December 21, 2017 4:21 PM
Leave a comment