Vice defends pedophiles - “The current misconception is that every pedophile is a child molester, and if they’re not, it’s just a matter of time. It’s important to show the world that that’s not the case.”
To be fair Snoopy the word pedophile has come to mean having sex with anyone under the age of 18, or taking naked pictures of anyone under the age of, up to 20, depending on the jurisdiction.
Take Roy Moore for example, all but one of the 'girls' he was accused of having sex with was over the legal age of consent
I find it amazing that for all the outrage politicians and the general public claim to have over this issue its been decades since any legislative body has done a comprehensive overhaul of the laws regarding age of consent for sexual activity
...That's right, you crazy little goofballs... I took the extra time to cut and paste the little "flying top hat -E- character" in order to make it extra-intimidatingly French.
Crid
at February 11, 2018 9:49 AM
Should it be "forensic" or "science" in scare quotes? oh, right, embrace the power of and!
"To be fair Snoopy the word pedophile has come to mean having sex with anyone under the age of 18, or taking naked pictures of anyone under the age of, up to 20, depending on the jurisdiction."
Again, depending on the jurisdiction (and the zeal of a prosecutor), the label is also applied to anyone who has pictures just like this one (SAFE FOR WORK) if they are not of immediate family members at an outdoor family outing.
(To be clear on the process: selecting any feminine name, followed by the word, "model" will produce a picture like this in Google Images. You probably knew this.)
Sex is more important than murder. Appearing to want it from an individual or class unapproved by a third party can cost you dearly.
Radwaste
at February 11, 2018 12:37 PM
Men have a dilemma as they're meant to form relationships and take the initiative, but commit “sexual harassment” if they misjudge a woman's interest. Yet I don't see much discussion from that perspective in the mainstream media.
Essentially, men are in a no-win situation in that they're considered Peter Pan man-children, wimps, etc. if they don't show interest and take initiative, but can be considered doing anything from harassment to sexual assault if they misjudge a woman's interest.
(Not an actual link per se, but something that causes internal conflict. Is that OK here?)
Sorry about that. My ancestors brought that crap with them from Britannic environs round about Plymouth Rock time and for some reason it's stayed with us.
Although honestly it would be the same if it had been old school Catholics, Muslims, snake-handling strychnine-chugging Christians, et al.
Something about the ol' in-n-out just gets some folks in a dither. A lathery, sweaty, forbidden dither.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers
at February 11, 2018 4:22 PM
> Something about the ol' in-n-out
> just gets some folks in a dither.
Yeah... "Consequences," the call it.
Crid
at February 11, 2018 6:25 PM
By the way, it's a lot of fun to be a guy who doesn't much think about age of consent, because why would you. A nice, general principle of stoic responsibility works nicely. For everyone. See Paglia.
Grid girls bad - North Korean slave girls good -
https://www.wsj.com/articles/north-korean-cheerleaders-100-olympic-stars-are-born-1518275788
Snoopy at February 11, 2018 7:48 AM
Vice defends pedophiles - “The current misconception is that every pedophile is a child molester, and if they’re not, it’s just a matter of time. It’s important to show the world that that’s not the case.”
https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/zmwn43/social-media-sites-cant-decide-how-to-handle-non-offending-pedophiles
Snoopy at February 11, 2018 7:53 AM
If you own a dog (even if it's not a beagle!), read this -
http://wjla.com/features/7-on-your-side/fda-to-investigate-after-abc7-exposes-euthanasia-drug-in-dog-food
Snoopy at February 11, 2018 7:54 AM
To be fair Snoopy the word pedophile has come to mean having sex with anyone under the age of 18, or taking naked pictures of anyone under the age of, up to 20, depending on the jurisdiction.
Take Roy Moore for example, all but one of the 'girls' he was accused of having sex with was over the legal age of consent
I find it amazing that for all the outrage politicians and the general public claim to have over this issue its been decades since any legislative body has done a comprehensive overhaul of the laws regarding age of consent for sexual activity
lujlp at February 11, 2018 8:21 AM
https://theintercept.com/2018/02/10/missouri-sentencing-judge-juvenile-bobby-bostic/
I get the sentiment, but on the other hand they did attempt to murder people who cooperated when mugged
lujlp at February 11, 2018 9:16 AM
Oh look, SJWs lying about hate crimes again
http://thefederalist.com/2018/01/31/reported-spike-anti-lgbt-homicides-fake-news/
lujlp at February 11, 2018 9:39 AM
Sometimes naiveté is not to be forgiven.
...That's right, you crazy little goofballs... I took the extra time to cut and paste the little "flying top hat -E- character" in order to make it extra-intimidatingly French.
Crid at February 11, 2018 9:49 AM
Should it be "forensic" or "science" in scare quotes? oh, right, embrace the power of and!
https://www.thenation.com/article/the-crisis-of-american-forensics/
I R A Darth Aggie at February 11, 2018 10:47 AM
"To be fair Snoopy the word pedophile has come to mean having sex with anyone under the age of 18, or taking naked pictures of anyone under the age of, up to 20, depending on the jurisdiction."
Again, depending on the jurisdiction (and the zeal of a prosecutor), the label is also applied to anyone who has pictures just like this one (SAFE FOR WORK) if they are not of immediate family members at an outdoor family outing.
(To be clear on the process: selecting any feminine name, followed by the word, "model" will produce a picture like this in Google Images. You probably knew this.)
Sex is more important than murder. Appearing to want it from an individual or class unapproved by a third party can cost you dearly.
Radwaste at February 11, 2018 12:37 PM
Men have a dilemma as they're meant to form relationships and take the initiative, but commit “sexual harassment” if they misjudge a woman's interest. Yet I don't see much discussion from that perspective in the mainstream media.
Essentially, men are in a no-win situation in that they're considered Peter Pan man-children, wimps, etc. if they don't show interest and take initiative, but can be considered doing anything from harassment to sexual assault if they misjudge a woman's interest.
(Not an actual link per se, but something that causes internal conflict. Is that OK here?)
Thomas Fullery at February 11, 2018 1:45 PM
Norks
Crid at February 11, 2018 2:46 PM
"Sex is more important than murder"
Sorry about that. My ancestors brought that crap with them from Britannic environs round about Plymouth Rock time and for some reason it's stayed with us.
Although honestly it would be the same if it had been old school Catholics, Muslims, snake-handling strychnine-chugging Christians, et al.
Something about the ol' in-n-out just gets some folks in a dither. A lathery, sweaty, forbidden dither.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at February 11, 2018 4:22 PM
> Something about the ol' in-n-out
> just gets some folks in a dither.
Yeah... "Consequences," the call it.
Crid at February 11, 2018 6:25 PM
By the way, it's a lot of fun to be a guy who doesn't much think about age of consent, because why would you. A nice, general principle of stoic responsibility works nicely. For everyone. See Paglia.
Crid at February 12, 2018 5:37 AM
Leave a comment