Failure To Lunch
I'm not ready for a relationship now, so I'm having a friends-with-benefits thing with this guy. He typically takes me out to eat before we hook up. However, a couple of times, he had someplace to be right afterward, so he didn't take me out to eat first. It really bothered me, and I'm not sure why. I know it's just sex; we're not dating. But I felt super-disrespected and almost cried later in the evening. I guess I felt used, which is weird because we're really "using" each other.
--Puzzled
To a guy, "just sex" is enough. You don't have to tell him he's pretty and take him to Yogurtland.
Although intellectually, "just sex" is enough for you, too, the problem is your emotions. They might just seem like a sort of wallpaper to add oomph to your mental den, but evolutionary psychologists Leda Cosmides and John Tooby explain that emotions are actually evolved motivational programs. They guide our behavior in the present according to what solved problems that recurred in our ancestral environment. Many of the threats and opportunities they help us manage are universal to male and female humans, thanks to, say, how a hungry bear isn't all that picky about which sex its double humanburger comes in.
However, in the let's-get-it-on-osphere, there's only one sex that gets pregnant and stuck with a kid to feed. So women, but not men, evolved to look for signs of a sex partner's ability and willingness to "invest." Even today, when that investment isn't there, female emotions are all "Ahem, missy!" -- making you feel bad: hurt, disrespected, used. Wanting to feel better is what motivates you to take corrective action. As anthropologist John Marshall Townsend observed about female subjects from his research: "Even when women voluntarily engaged in casual sex and expressed extremely permissive attitudes, their emotions urged them to test and evaluate investment, detect shirking and false advertising, and remedy deficiencies in investment."
And no, you can't just plead your case to your emotions with "But I'm using birth control!" Your emotions are running on very old software (predating even those early '90s AOL floppies), so as far as they're concerned, there's no such thing as sex without possible mommyhood. In other words, if you're going to make casual sex work for you, you need to see that it works for your emotions. Basically, your body is your temple, and prospective worshippers need to sacrifice a goat to the goddess -- or, at the very least, buy the lady a hamburger.








That poor bastard is going to be completely blindsided and bewildered when she accuses him of rape in two years.
Hawkguy at June 20, 2017 7:47 PM
If they were in college Hawk, I'd agree with you.
railmeat at June 21, 2017 8:55 AM
If they were in college Hawk, I'd agree with you.
Or if Amy's choice had won the election last year.
dee nile at June 21, 2017 10:14 AM
"To a guy, 'just sex' is enough"... for some guys, maybe. THIS guy has found that he becomes very emotionally attached to his bedmates, especially when they have a lot of future potential.
Too bad, those have been just the ones who feel like "just sex" is plenty... when they dumped me for Christmas (three times).
jefe at June 21, 2017 3:06 PM
Oh yeah, doesn't the phrase "I'm not ready for a relationship now" really mean "with YOU!"
jefe at June 21, 2017 3:09 PM
She leads with "I'm not ready for a relationship...", but then gets her panties twisted because of the lack of relationship-y stuff from the guy. Could be the guy is sensing the push-pull dynamic she's got going, and is starting to baaacck awaaaay sloooowwlly..
bkmale at June 22, 2017 6:44 AM
Methinks she doth protest too much.
It could very well be that she 'thought' she didn't want to get into a relationship. There is a lot of investment in time, resources and emotion after all.
Well, maybe Amy is correct or maybe, after she spent even a few hours with this guy, her inner goddess decided 'Hey...it isn't THAT much time and resources'. Maybe she saw potential and is simply in denial of what she CURRENTLY wants.
As a guy, it's hard to feel sorry for her. She set up the rules. Now she doesn't like the rules. That is a problem, but it is a personal problem.
But it's kind of greedy to want all the benefits and perks of 'relationship' while not investing your side of the bargain.
Would she have been as understanding if suddenly HE got too clingy?
(Putting on my Pussy Hat)
I can sort of see her emotional point. Amy unpacked all the evolutionary science, but there is also cultural baggage. Being treated as a disposable receptacle for sperm has to be emotionally devastating as well. That is not how her older female role models behaved and that is not the role any woman wants to be in.
But again (doffs hat) SHE set up these rules.
She needs to woman up and consider very carefully what she ACTUALLY wants and not what her current social model says she should want. Because clearly they are in conflict.
It could simply be that she resents that he ISN'T so agog for her that he is fainting with anticipation at being with her awesomeness.
Lots of possibilities.
FIDO at June 22, 2017 7:34 AM
"take him to Yogurtland"
Wait - I thought that was the goal of FWB?
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at June 28, 2017 10:07 PM
Leave a comment