Hey, How About A Nice, Medically Unnecessary Operation For Your Child?
Oxford bioethicist Brian David Earp has another smart piece up -- this time, at Aeon -- about the barbarism that is circumcision:
All forms of non-therapeutic female genital alteration - no matter how sterilised or minor - are deemed to be mutilations in 'Western' countries. All are prohibited by law. The reason for this, when you get right down to it, is that cutting into a girl's genitals without a medical diagnosis, and without her consent, is equivalent to criminal assault on a minor under the legal codes of most of these societies. And, morally, I think the law is correct here. I don't think that a sharp object should be taken to any child's vulva unless it is to save her life or health, or unless she has given her fully informed permission to undergo such an operation, and wants to take on the relevant risks and consequences.In that case, of course, she wouldn't be a 'child' anymore, but rather an adult woman, who can make a decision about her own body.
The story is very different when it comes to male circumcision. In no jurisdiction is the practice prohibited, and in many it is not even restricted. In some countries, including in the United States, anyone, with any instrument, and any degree of medical training (including none) can attempt to perform a circumcision on a non-consenting child - sometimes with disastrous consequences. For a recent example, look up 'Goodluck Caubergs' on the internet; similar cases happen every year.
...a small and insistent group of (mostly American) scientists have taken it upon themselves to promote infant male circumcision as a form of partial prophylaxis against disease. Most of these diseases are rare in developed countries, do not affect children before an age of sexual debut, and can be prevented and/or treated through much more conservative means. Nevertheless - since it is not against the law for them to do so - advocates of (male) circumcision are able to conduct study after well-funded study to see just what kinds of 'health benefits' might follow from cutting off parts of the penis.
Frankensteinian.
Medically unnecessary genital surgeries - of whatever degree of severity - will affect different people differently. This is because each individual's relationship to their own body is unique, including what they find aesthetically appealing, what degree of risk they feel comfortable taking on when it comes to elective surgeries on their reproductive organs, and even what degree of sexual sensitivity they prefer (for personal or cultural reasons). That's why ethicists are beginning to argue that individuals should be left to decide what to do with their own genitals when it comes to irreversible surgery, whatever their sex or gender.
Those of you who will argue for circumcision, consider whether that's because you think medically unnecessary surgery -- which comes with risks -- is a great thing for your child. Or...is it possible that you're for it because you got your child circumcised and prefer to confirm that you were right rather than question whether you did the wrong thing?








I'm circumcised, my son is not. Now he's 12 he's saying he wishes we had decided to circumcise him in infancy. We explained the religious roots but that we didn't feel that particular tradition worth carrying on.
Told him he's free to decide for himself if he wants it done at 18 or after.
I'm honestly not sure what's right or best, but on balance, not doing something that's irreversible at least allows for consideration, maturation, and study.
Brad at December 13, 2016 10:32 PM
I admire you for taking that tack, Brad. It's so much easier to go along with what "everybody" is doing.
Amy Alkon at December 13, 2016 10:44 PM
Yawn.
Statistically throughout the decades how is this a health issue, a cultural issue, or even a topic?
Giving your kids BAGS of potato chips to snack on is much worse but ...
Some have way too much time on their hands.
Bob in Texas at December 14, 2016 5:38 AM
It's barbaric, and dying out. Fewer boys were circumcised then not, for several years now.
Momof4 at December 14, 2016 8:04 AM
A friend at age 14 asked his parents (the mother a surgeon, the father an oncologist) to get a circumcision. His reasoning was that he didn't want to give women cervical cancer.
I have no idea why his parents let him. But it was fun watching him walk like a duck for months.
Sixclaws at December 14, 2016 9:39 AM
Did you know that the CDC, FDA etc. do NOT keep statistics on how many little boys are mutilated by circumcision? Not, death but conditions which cause the boy to suffer problems, often lifelong, with sometimes serious physical and psychological effects.
I myself suffer from the effects of my circumcision. Basically the vermin who cut me took off too much which forced the corpora cavernosa (the spongy tubes that fill with blood to create an erection) into my body. The result of this was erections that were excessively ridged and took far longer than normal to reduce (Which seemed like a good thing in my younger days). The long term consequences have been erectile dysfunction from internal damage caused by my equipment being jammed back into my body. Corrective surgery was not an option for me 30 years ago.
All these problems, and yes pain, caused by a completely cosmetic surgery with NO medical necessity what-so-ever!
P.S. Just for the record, the 'they cut off too much' excuse is common among men who find their size inadequate. I myself did not have that issue as I am somewhat larger than the average North American White Male (by actual doctors measurement).
Warhawke223 at December 14, 2016 12:03 PM
Yawn.
Statistically throughout the decades how is this a health issue, a cultural issue, or even a topic?
Tell me Bob, do you agree with product recalls issued by the governemnts CPSC because of the death toll products such as drop down railing cribs, quick release gate designed to keep kids off the stairs, toys with choking hazards, ect have?
lujlp at December 14, 2016 12:18 PM
Point being on average many of those products are responsible for a few dozens deaths a decade.
The CDC tracks carbon monoxides deaths, 430 over the last 15 years. Less than 30 per year.
On average less than 40 children die each year being left in hot cars
Roughly 70 children under the age of five drown in bathtubs each year
The people who fight against circumcision figure about 100 children die each year from complications of circumcision.
Now granted they have an ax to grind, but no one seem able to refute their numbers.
You ask why its a big deal?
Fair enough, why then are children being left to die of heat stroke a big deal as its less than half?
Why does the CDC track carbon monoxide deaths that are less than a third?
Why does the CPSC recall products that have one tenth the death rate?
We spend tens of millions of dollars every year on product research, data analysis, and PSAs to prevent accidents that each cause less loss of life than circumcision
If all of these other, far less lethal, issues are bid deals why isnt circumcision?
lujlp at December 14, 2016 12:50 PM
Bob, I seem to remember something about male circumcision reducing the likelihood of HIV transmission. Though I don't know whether there are other factors (based on geography) to consider. Of course, even if there are, it's still going to be controversial.
lenona at December 14, 2016 4:10 PM
My point is that there seems to be some hysteria in the language/tone.
Obviously any surgical procedure has potential issues and this should be discussed and evaluated.
Logic seems to indicate that the procedure is not necessary and the fact that it is a common practice does not justify its use. (We just did what our pediatrician recommended.)
But the tone, the governments stopping it in the name of health, the statistic of deaths (which is not backed up by date as far Google shows), and the "no human being has the right to blah blah blah" statements (not here) is tiresome. Don't these people have a life other than screaming the sky is falling?
Although Joe Friday didn't state "Just the facts Ma'am." it's applicable to a lot of issues.
Bob in Texas at December 14, 2016 4:43 PM
> because you think medically
> unnecessary surgery
When your abuse of language is so ham-handed, do you seriously expect to persuade?
Crid at December 14, 2016 7:50 PM
I'm glad I was circumcised as a child. I was saved the chore of fiddling with my foreskin every time I had to use the bathroom.
ALL HAIL THE FORESKIN!!!
mpetrie98 at December 14, 2016 7:58 PM
@Warhawke223: Removing skin is not going to affect the underlying organ. Skin stretches and grows as needed: just consider how your penis grew when you hit puberty.
"Just for the record, the 'they cut off too much' excuse is common among men who find their size inadequate."
Even dumber. It's only skin. Granted, there's no reason to cut it off, and any surgery carries risks of infection, but removing skin has nothing to do with penis size or function.
a_random_guy at December 15, 2016 12:21 AM
Thanks for writing this. I have found that one of the privileges of being male is to be ignored. So it doesn't matter how many men like me talk about bad circumcision is and how it hurt us. We will be ignored. The most effective men's rights activists are female. Male circumcision will only end when there are enough female activists speaking up.
P.S. I just finished reading UNSPEAKABLE MUTATIONS: Circumcised men speak out. Half of that book could have been written about me.
P.P.S. I just started reading SEX AS NATURE INTENDED IT. This book focuses on how circumcision harms sex. Only when women see how male circumcision hurt women will this barbaric violence stop.
Joshua Thom at December 15, 2016 12:37 AM
"...this barbaric violence." From our new commenter, "Joshua Thom."
Crid at December 15, 2016 1:52 PM
@a_random_guy
Buried Penis symptoms;
"Circumcision can also lead to the problem, particularly circumcision during which the shaft skin has been mistaken for the foreskin, effectively trimming the tissue too far down - meaning skin will push the penis back into the pubic pad."
http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/770334/Buried-penis-symptoms-treatment?utm_source=traffic.outbrain&utm_medium=traffic.outbrain&utm_term=traffic.outbrain&utm_content=traffic.outbrain&utm_campaign=traffic.outbrain
I've been looking for something like this because you have NO idea what you are talking about.
And yes, I am the guy that will remember shit like this for months and go back when I find the place where it needs to go.
warhawke223 at February 25, 2017 10:58 PM
Leave a comment