Home  •  Columns  •  Blog  •  Features  •  Rude People  •  Amy's Mall  •  Bio/Contact  •  Private Sessions

Advice Goddess Blog
advicegoddess.com: The Official Amy Alkon
 Website
amy alkon, syndicated advice columnist, journalist, author and blogger

Advice Goddess Blog

Amy Alkon

Amy Alkon


SEARCH BLOG


Kindle Edition
Amy on Twitter
.
BLOG ARCHIVES

MAIN MENU
Home
Columns
Blog
Features
Rude People
Amy's Mall
Bio/Contact
Private Sessions

Goddess' Dog lucy

LINKS

Cathy Seipp
Gary Taubes
Dr. Eades
Scott Barry Kaufman
Rob Kurzban
Gad Saad
Catherine Salmon
Dr. William Davis
Girl Gone Primal
David Rensin
Elmore Leonard
Emmanuelle Richard
Howard Bloom
Jill Stewart
John Callahan
Ken Layne
Good Men Project
Etiquette Hell
Dr. Eades
Andrew Malcolm
Satoshi Kanazawa
Luke Ford
Luke Thompson
Matt Welch
David Wallis
Kill The Calls
Deep Glamour
TeachU2BRich
Patterico
Venice Paper
Live 2.0 
Whole Health Source
Moxie
Instapundit
Visible Trash
Max Ferguson
Mickey Kaus
Rishawn Biddle
Eugene Volokh
Howard Owens
Nancy Rommelman
Gay Patriot
Discursive Daily
Jihad Watch
Dr. Helen
Seth Godin
Islam In Europe
iFeminists
Overlawyered
Wendy McElroy
Terry Rossio
Ed Padgett
Defamer
Brady Westwater
Pat Saperstein
Jackie Danicki
Grant McCracken
Deceiver
Ed Brayton
David Dean Bottrell

Glenn Sacks
T.B.T.I.
Christy Trotter
PollyVousFrancais?
Apple Lane
Michael J. Totten
Science-Based Medicine
Michelle Collins
The Paris Blog
Apres Le Beep
Eye Prefer Paris
La Coquette
Respectful Insolence
Bob Norman
Romenesko
LA Observed.com
Machines Like Us
Roman Genn
Little Shiva
The Fabulous Ruins of Detroit
Concurring Opinions
Becoming a Chef
Albert Ellis: REB Therapy
Nathaniel Branden: self-esteem
Stanton Peele: addiction
Betty Dodson: on sex
Helen Fisher: nature of love
Bella DePaulo: singles
David Buss: ev psych
Stephen Pinker: cognition
John Gottman: staying married
Syndicate This Site (XML)




4.37




« Previous | Home | Next »

E-Mail 'N Run
I love people who write me and tell me I can't write back. Perhaps some of you care to respond in my place, since our little coward here says my e-mail address is blocked:

In a message dated 4/29/08 10:50:27 PM, bbsoldado@riseup.net writes:

I think it would be a good idea to fully read something before making a comment about it. I am talking about your comment on the Special Order 40. The people being protected from this are the "victims" not the criminals. As I read the rest of the comments I realized there was many people like you who just want a little bit of attention and want to put their two cents. Stick to your childish blog and leave politics to other people.

PS. Don't bother writing back I already blocked you re e-mail. By the way did you know that the majority of crimes in the US are white on white? of course you didn't TV has you asleep.

The problem is, few cops understand Special Order 40, and don't ask or do anything about a criminal's illegal status, which is why I gave the following quote (in 40 words or less, per the LA Times' requirements for their piece on the topic):

If I want a job cleaning your company's toilets, I'll have to present proof of citizenship and swear under penalty of perjury I'm legal, but if I mug you, beat you, and leave you for dead, it's no questions asked?

--Amy Alkon, syndicated columnist, advicegoddess.com

An excerpt from my blog item on this, "A Lot Of Especially Confused Police Officers":

I've talked to cops about this, including an FBI agent I met recently, and the way this plays out in real life is that police officers don't ask criminals about their immigration status.

Immigration status should not just be gingerly inquired about but rigorously checked upon arrest. And, in fact, I'd like to see all our immigration laws rigorously enforced. Am I willing to pay more for a head of lettuce? Even dollars more? Sure I am. And more for a carwash, too. Especially now, with the danger from terrorism, it's especially stupid for us to have porous borders and barely enforced immigration laws.

My pal Heather MacDonald, a Manhattan Institute fellow, testified before the House on "sanctuary laws" like Special Order 40, which she calls "a serious impediment to stemming gang violence and other crime" and "a perfect symbol of this country's topsy-turvy stance towards illegal immigration."

Plus, we're paying to keep these people in jail instead of dumping them over the border where they belong.

Here's a link to the actual, printed Special Order 40. I actually linked it in the blog item I've excerpted above, but, apparently, magically, without reading it as I did it!

| Comments (5)



*

Comments

Hmm. Only if I dug up that article in MacAddict about falsifying e-mail headers would I write this guy. I'm not interested in getting his SPAM. When he said, "the majority of crime is white-on-white", it shows how little research he's done. Hey, I should expect that. He did no reading of your work from comprehension; why should I expect him to have seen anything from the Bureau of Justice about crime?

Posted by: Radwaste at April 30, 2008 8:37 AM

Actually, as you know, being stopped from speaking out isn't something I handle well, so I simply forwarded my response to him to another e-mail address I have and responded from there. (Although I'm guessing he didn't really block me; he's just a childish twat.)

Posted by: Amy Alkon at April 30, 2008 9:47 AM

I can see his point, wait don't bite my head off yet. The law was created with the specific intent of allowing people to testify in court without their credibility questioned through immigration status. Since many of those involved are illegal immigrants on both sides it made sense at the time. Now we see how this is being implemented it should be removed.

"Plus, we're paying to keep these people in jail instead of dumping them over the border where they belong." Here I disagree. If you just dump them over the border they will simply cross back over. Their immigration status will be a get out of jail free card. Now if we lock them up as we would for home grown or legal immigrant criminals and then ship them out I agree.

Posted by: vlad at April 30, 2008 10:54 AM

Well, then keep them in prison here, but make them run like hamsters on a wheel to pay for their keep. All prisoners, in fact, should be made to do that. Why should I pay for them just because they tried (and maybe succeeded) to scam, hurt or kill somebody, and then got caught?

And vlad, the difference is, you post your opinion here for debate instead of taking the hit and run approach.

Posted by: Amy Alkon at April 30, 2008 10:59 AM

> Only if I dug up that article
> in MacAddict about falsifying
> e-mail headers would I write

I have a handsomely distinct email account for just such purposes. I wrote to him before noon Wednesday, but haven't heard back yet.

Posted by: Crid at May 1, 2008 1:14 AM

Leave a comment




Order Now!



Read Strivectin Reviews
Consumer Reviews
Medicare Supplemental Insurance Vistaprint party invitations
Click here to learn about BlogAds on this site.