Andrew Breitbart claims to have lots more of these tapes. He released a statement directed at Eric Holder yesterday, saying that if the Justice Department doesn't launch a full-fledged investigation of ACORN, he will hold a bunch of his tapes and release them just before the 2010 elections.

I saw that too Cousin Dave, and apparently not all of the tapes being held involve ACORN. Wonder if he has an ACE up his sleeve for Holder? Or other politicians (considering the 2010 election date)?

I recently read somewhere that a large portion of Republican voters think that Acorn stole the election for Obama. More people than Democrats ever thought GWB was illegitimate, despite the legitimate concerns and challenges regardibg Florida.

I think that if conservatives continue to focus on the unimportant misdeeds of Acorn and promote the electoral viability of ciphers such as Sarah Palin, their time in the political wilderness will be even more well deserved than it already was following the spectacularly inept and fiscally irresponsible GWB administration.

"...legitimate concerns and challenges regardibg Florida..."

"...unimportant misdeeds of Acorn..."

Ah. It's totally OK if it's associated with President Obama?

No. 1 - This scandal is not meaningfully associated with Obama. 2 - There is no evidence that Acorn's misdeeds have affected any election results.

And the Florida election fiasco was not meaningfully associated with President Bush.

I see what you're doing.

"...spectacularly inept and fiscally irresponsible GWB administration."

Cash for Clunkers ring a bell (or are you part of the electorate that thinks "history" is last week's People magazine)? Continuing in the Middle East, under the exact same requirements of the War Powers Act adhered to by GWB. Corporate bailouts. These are approved by the same mindless, schizophrenic drones who turn around and mouth "corporate welfare" berating Republicans for tax law changes!

Whether or not ACORN was involved in election fraud, the answer is very simple: require photo ID for voters, and check the voter roles to ensure that votes are only cast by legitimate, living residents of each precinct. You have to show a photo ID to cash a check, which is surely a less important event that casting a vote.

Interesting how objections to requiring ID are often made by organizations (like ACORN) whose motivations are suspect.

better yet have mail in ballots picked up in person with proof of ID a month before the day of the election and have those ballots mailed in

no polling places with lines, no "oh i must be in the wrong station give me a absenttee ballot anyway", no computerized voting machine that are easy to hack no more excuses of how one day "isnt enough time"

Imagine a night free of wall to wall election coverage and jackasses explaining how this canidate is winning, now wiat this one is, and this is why this mean that for those people and not for us