Disgusting Seizure Of Cash By DHS Jerks At Airport
A family flying from the U.S. to Ethiopia, where life is transacted in cash, had their $35K confiscated through agents' apparent trickery in order to notch another "got one!" statistic to their agency's belt. Via Overlawyered and Powerline, the story is at Volokh:
1. Introduction.At the airport, federal officers confiscated $35,131 from a family flying to Ethiopia. They said that the couple intentionally attempted to evade the reporting requirements for taking money outside of the United States. The citizens clearly had no intention to violate the rules, and the government must return their money and pay for their attorney's fees and costs of court.
2. Background.
On June 2, 2011, Kyle Jones and his wife Berekti Jones were at George Bush Intercontinental Airport with their daughter Soliyana. They were flying to Ethiopia through Dubai and planned to stay in Addis Ababa for two, months while visiting family and celebrating Soliyana's second birthday.
The law requires that an international traveler declare on a form(a) that he has no more than $10,000 or (b) report the amount. When the couple reached the first check, officer Agustin Hernandez from the Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security asked Kyle how much currency and monetary instruments he had on him. Kyle responded that he did not know. Hernandez then asked how many dollars he was carrying; Kyle replied that he would guess around $20,200. Hernandez wrote $20,200 on the form. He told Kyle to sign it, and Kyle did.
Hernandez then took the family to another table where officer Charlesworth Clarke told them to put all of their currency on it. At that point, Kyle asked what counted as currency because he had traveler's checks. From his six carry-on bags and jacket he retrieved everything -- $20,000 in traveler's checks and $11,131 in cash. Berekti, who had been tending to their daughter during the conversations, handed the officer her wallet. It had $4,ooo in cash. The officers then frisked the Joneses and searched their bags, and found no additional money -- however described.
The officers seized the entire $31,131 that the Joneses had voluntarily given them and released them from custody. Having missed their flight, the Joneses spent $1,500 to replace the tickets plus having had to rent a hotel room.
3. Intent.
Six officers appeared at the trial, four of whom testified. A "case agent" sat with the government's counsel. He knew nothing. His sole contribution had been to enter data into a computer; he could not have assisted the United States attorney. In addition to overreaching the people whom they are to serve, three officers wasted oneehalf day watching four others embarrass themselves.
The government presented no evidence -- none -- that the Joneses intended to evade the reporting requirements. Kyle told Hernandez that he did not know the amount of money he was carrying. Saying "I do not know" is not a deliberate failure to report. After Hernandez insisted on an answer, Kyle said that he would have to guess. [Footnote: Reports on Exporting and Importing Monetary Instruments, 31 U.S.C. §§ 5316 (1986).] Guessing is not a material omission or a misstatement of fact -- certainly not one the government can use to steal the money. [Id. §§ 5317(c)(2), 5324(c).]
The agency's official publications say that its officers can help travelers complete the form if they require assistance. Instead of ensuring that the Joneses understood the scope of "monetary instruments" and other reporting requirements, the officers took advantage of their guess. Hernandez instructed Kyle to complete the form before allowing him to count his money, and the others never let them correct it once their guess was shown to have been low.
These public servants sought to earn credit with their agency by collecting money. Some of it is returned to the agency -- like justices of the peace whose pay is derived directly from the fines they impose. They focused on bureaucratic imperatives -- not their duties to the public and law. [Footnote: Leonard W. Levy, A License to Steal: The Forfeiture of Property (1996).]







...three officers wasted one half day watching four others embarrass themselves.
Hilarious or pathetic? Since we're paying these idiots, probably pathetic.
Also, the statements in the article are from the judge's written opinion on the case.
The judge goes on to order the gov't to return the money, and pay the court costs and attorney's fees (in case you missed the summary in the first part).
These are the idiots the government has put in place to **protect** us.
DrCos at April 11, 2012 3:36 AM
This is more efficient than involving the IRS and taking it in blocks of 33%, but i worry that we might be missing some of the out-bound money. Perhaps we can build a wall around the country to keep the money from escaping. With some guard towers.
Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder at April 11, 2012 6:55 AM
We paid the attorney fees and court costs. The "officers" suffered nothing. Nice racket they've got there.
MarkD at April 11, 2012 7:31 AM
"Perhaps we can build a wall around the country to keep the money from escaping. With some guard towers. "
Don't give them any ideas.
Cousin Dave at April 11, 2012 6:42 PM
But of course they would not be allowed to look in the other direction to prevent illegals from entering.
Jim P. at April 11, 2012 8:43 PM
Leave a comment