How France Has Fairer Tax Policy Than We Do (Just On Expats!)
Daniel J. Mitchell writes:
Specifically, there are two ways in which France has better policy than the United States.1. France, like almost every other civilized nation, does not have worldwide taxation. So when French citizens move to Switzerland, Hong Kong, or the United States, they pay tax to those nations. But they're no longer subject to French taxes on this foreign-source income. Sadly, that is not true for overseas Americans, who are subject to tax in the nations where they live AND the IRS. Their only choice, if they want to escape this punitive and unfair form of double taxation, is to give up U.S. citizenship.
2. But when Americans like Eduardo Saverin decide to surrender their passports, they are hit by punitive exit taxes. This is the type of policy normally associated with some of the world's most odious regimes, such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. France, I am told, is not perfect in this regard, but the tax treatment of people re-domiciling in another country is not nearly so onerous (especially if they go to another EU nation).
I want good tax policy, like the flat tax, regardless of what's happening in other nations. But it says a lot (and none of it good) when one of the world's most statist nations has better policy than America.
"Zorba," a commenter at his site notes how backward this is:
The future of the world belongs to the international citizen; economic mercenaries who, in a highly mobile world, will offer their superior ideas and vitality to whichever environment lets them operate freely, contribute their great ideas and products to society, AND keep the reward of their contributions.
Mitchell discusses the issue here further in the wake of Denise Rich's tax expatriation.







There's a year and half long line to give your US citizenship up in Switzerland. Couple people I know are not in it.
Being a US citizen sucks in that you pay the higher tax rate out of the 2 countries, whichever it is.
But you get to stand in the shorter passport line when entering the US. Or move back there more easily.
I don't want to give up my citizenship, not just because we might move back some day. Even if we don't, I've got an emotional attachment that is worth the higher tax rate. But for some people I know, who were naturalized US citizens who moved back, who don't have the same attachment, I get how the citizenship is more of a liability than an asset.
NicoleK at July 12, 2012 2:35 PM
er, that should read "a couple people I know are in it" not "not in it"
NicoleK at July 12, 2012 2:36 PM
I talked to my friend who lives outside the US awhile back and he said that there is fair sized deduction. If I recall correctly, the first $80K earned in the country and subject to local tax is not taxed by the US.
The Former Banker at July 12, 2012 8:42 PM
Leave a comment