Virginia Vintners, Why Do They Control You?
Because they can.
Mark J. Fitzgibbons writes in the WashEx that Virgina vintners are tasting the police state:
While the Obama administration is busy eviscerating private property rights at the federal level, Republican-controlled Fauquier County, Va., has decided to follow suit in its own way. Fauquier's Board of Supervisors recently passed a winery ordinance that tramples private property rights and some fundamental civil liberties....At the center of all this is the county zoning administrator, a bureaucratic czar named Kimberley Johnson, whose bullying and heavy-handed enforcement tactics have resulted in calls for her dismissal by county farmers and residents. Johnson was recently the subject of a citizen-farmer "pitchfork protest" in a matter in which she fined one farmer for conducting a pumpkin carving and a birthday party for eight little girls without the proper permit.
The winery ordinance is Obama-esque, passed under the pretext that it protects the health, safety and welfare of the public. It forces wineries to close at 6 p.m. and prohibits sale of food -- something that goes quite safely with a taste of wine -- unless the wineries obtain special permits from the zoning administrator.
The ordinance lists prohibited winery activities such as hot air balloon rides, farmers' markets, and mini-golf, which assuredly threaten the health, safety and welfare of the public, right?
Among the prohibited activities, the ordinance includes anything else determined by the zoning administrator "to be similar in nature or in impact to" the listed activities. That's the equivalent allowing police officers to ticket drivers for nearly anything they wish.
The winery ordinance comes with potential criminal penalties, yet it has weak standards of evidence and due process to protect the innocent. It's a civil liberties and property rights nightmare on its face. Chicago politics and even dictatorships mask their tyrannical abuses of law better than this.







mini-golf - a public safety/health issue? Must be those tiny windmills and small water hazards.
Charles at August 17, 2012 5:07 AM
@Charles: Sometimes the direct solutions would be the best. Tar. Feathers.
Mini-golf is now regulated by the federal government: "Effective on March 15, 2012, the 2010 ADA Standard includes new design
requirements and applies to new or altered miniature golf courses"
It is definitely tar-and-feathers time. The tar goes on hot.
a_random_guy at August 17, 2012 5:20 AM
Then when the wineries shut down or move elsewhere because they can't make a profit -- what does the county do without a tax base.
Jim P. at August 17, 2012 5:50 AM
So selling food after 6 without a permit might cause food posioning, but selling it at 5:59 without a permit is perfectly healthy?
Is the governemnt getting dumber
lujlp at August 17, 2012 6:34 AM
Amy Alkon
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2012/08/17/virginia_vintne.html#comment-3308141">comment from lujlpWe are, for enabling it.
Amy Alkon
at August 17, 2012 6:40 AM
"The Fauquier ordinance clearly violates Virginia's Right to Farm Act, which guarantees agriculture activities of growing and selling"
that may well be true but it tells me that the author doesn't get what's going here. We're talking about the conversion from agriculturally-based activities to tourist-based activities. There is a big difference between living next to a functioning winery and living next to a winery that's just a loss-leader for a wedding farm.
From the ordinance: WHEREAS, the County desires to protect and promote the cultivation of grapes and the production of excellent, locally made wines
The County wants to fashion itself as Lodi rather than Napa. I may disagree with that wisdom but that's their goal.
Also Amy, one of your other narratives is being anti-DUI. Would you want to live down the lane from a hot-spot for drunk politicians? (This is an hour outside DC)
Again from the ordinance: WHEREAS, the County is equally cognizant of its need to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public, particularly when the consumption of alcohol is occurring in proximity to the use of the County’s rural road network.
So they want to draw a line between sophisticated day-time wine tasting and Friday night concerts with washed-up 80's bands.
Ever heard a hot-air balloon up close? They fly between dawn and about 8 am too. Loud and early, great neighbors. Classic nuisance.
All that said, this is poorly drafted and seems destined for the 'how not to do it' section of the Landuse planning textbooks. Hadacheck, Euclid, Fauquier.
smurfy at August 17, 2012 12:48 PM
Check this out, right up front they fully admit one of the goals of the regulation is to put the squeeze on newcomers:
WHEREAS, the County is cognizant of the desire of many farm wineries to conduct
certain activities and events at farm wineries that are tangential to the making and sale of their
wine, but serve to enhance their profitability, particularly in the early years of wine production;
I think this is going to be a fun one to watch.
smurfy at August 17, 2012 12:55 PM
Charles, as a dad and a I drinker I have to point out that mini-golf plus alcohol out in the country equals not only DUI but felony DUI because there's a kid in the car. I think they are on pretty solid ground calling that a health and safety issue. It does sound fun if I could cajole someone into driving though.
I wish I had read the entire ordinance before commenting. It is not nearly as arbitrary and vague as the linked article painted it to be.
smurfy at August 17, 2012 1:13 PM
Yeah, but according to this law its only a problem after 6pm, before that the drunks and the farmers can do what they fucking want. And given the way the article is written and the piss poor way the law is written, from what I gather you can still sell booze after six, just not food, or mini golf, or a place to sleep it off
lujlp at August 17, 2012 2:43 PM
OK this part cracked me up. from the prohibited use list:
6. Go-kart, motorized bike or four-wheeler trails, tracks or rides
I know you guys drink a lot of labrusca back east but come on, a go kart track slash winery? Does the wine come in a box?
On the other hand prohibiting spa services cuts out the 'clothing optional wine tasting and soak', which is a business model I could go for.
I'm only half way through but so far most of the regulations actually seem well-reasoned. Like the access regulations lampooned in the article. they basically say, put up a fence or some bushes so the headlights don't shine in the neighbor's house.
Luj, this is a zoning ordinance. One of the most legitimate uses of zoning law is to regulate nuisances. Plenty of things that are not a nuisance during the day become one at night.
smurfy at August 17, 2012 3:22 PM
Leave a comment