Insane Government Handouts Available To Women And Hispanics With Gardens
These USDA payouts are supposed to compensate for all the previous insane government handouts -- aka subsidized farm loans -- given to white guys.
James Bovard writes at the WSJ of the USDA's billion dollar farm payout to women and Hispanics who might've once had a thought about applying for a loan to spiffy up their backyard garden:
Are you a woman or a Hispanic who planted a backyard garden between 1981 and 2000? Did you ever dream of asking for a loan for help growing more? If so, you might be a victim of discrimination and entitled to a $50,000 payout from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. But hurry--the deadline for submitting your claim is March 25.The USDA announced in September that it would award a total of at least $1.3 billion to women and Hispanics who were not offered subsidized farm loans that they applied for, or said later they would have liked to apply for, from 1981 to 2000. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, saying that his agency was following the "path to justice," invited "women and Hispanic farmers and ranchers who allege past discrimination" to come forward "to receive compensation."
...The bonanza was spurred by the Obama administration's apparent discovery of a constitutional right for every citizen to squander tax dollars while farming. Since most farm loans previously went to white males, Uncle Sam is atoning by giving awards of $50,000 apiece to claimants from other ethnic groups or the non-male gender.
But the Arent Fox law firm in Washington, D.C., and other advocates for female farmers took exception to the USDA's requirement that claimants submit solid evidence that they actually farmed or sought subsidized loans during the late 20th century.
No, I will not be applying -- though I am a woman, have killed many plants I was trying to grow, and have, at times, wished dollar bills would rain down on me as I was watering my soon-to-be-dead plants.
Bovard continues:
The real problem with federal farm loans is that they are prejudiced against common sense and sound business practices. There is no shortage of commercial loans nowadays for competent, credit-worthy farmers. USDA loan programs exist solely to let Congress steer capital to politically favored applicants. The fact that the loans often leave recipients worse off is irrelevant as long as congressmen reap campaign contributions and votes from many beneficiaries.







Pigford, part DOH!
I R A Darth Aggie at March 21, 2013 11:29 AM
so is this the whole "makin' it rain money thing?"
"But the Arent Fox law firm in Washington, D.C., and other advocates for female farmers took exception to the USDA's requirement that claimants submit solid evidence that they actually farmed or sought subsidized loans during the late 20th century."
of course not. The poor dears were so traumatized by the whole process, they gave up their overalls, and retreated to nunneries! Oh the humanity!
SwissArmyD at March 21, 2013 12:16 PM
2 wrongs /= 1 right
I mean, duh, right?
Tyler at March 21, 2013 12:30 PM
I'm going to have to pass this on to a co-worker. Maybe she'll cut me in on some of it. ;-)
Might as well suck the money out if the fed wants to be an idiot.
Jim P. at March 21, 2013 7:15 PM
When the country falls and breaks up into warring geographical and ethnic factions, I wonder if Mexico will continue these vote-buying policies in Mexifornia, Arizaztec, and the New Mayan Nation?
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at March 21, 2013 8:26 PM
Let's make these loans non-dischargeable in bankrupcy. Enough Federal largesse, and we'll see the return of slavery in my lifetime.
MarkD at March 22, 2013 9:17 AM
A low interest loan = $50,000 cash. I got to wonder how much were the loans for.
Joe J at March 22, 2013 9:21 AM
"USDA loan programs exist solely to let Congress steer capital to politically favored applicants"
So it's no different from the federal government's treatment of people who bid on construction projects. Same goes for trying to get a civil service job with the feds. Wow affirmative action really has corrupted more of the economy than I thought.
Vic Kelley at March 23, 2013 12:55 PM
Leave a comment